· Public charity
De Pere Christian Outreach
The organization provides clothing, utilities, housing and other physical needs to economically disadvantaged people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 38 grants below total $315,700 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $410,609 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $94,909 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $151k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $165k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST JOHNS HOMELESS SHELTER | $25,000 |
| THE HOUSE OF HOPE | $15,000 |
| COMPASSIONATE HOME HEALTH | $15,000 |
| ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING | $15,000 |
| GOLDEN HOUSE | $15,000 |
| SHOP WITH A COP | $10,000 |
| VETERANS 1ST OF NEW INC | $10,000 |
| CASA OF BROWN COUNTY | $10,000 |
| OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING | $10,000 |
| FREEDOM HOUSE | $10,000 |
| NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER | $10,000 |
| UWGREEN BAY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NWTC SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $10,000 |
| EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS | $8,500 |
| JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SJST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $148k · revenue +28%
- EPECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC8× · 2017–2024 · $94k · revenue +29%
- MCMEDIATION CENTER OF GREATER GB INC8× · 2017–2024 · $83k · revenue +123%
Funded once
- SNST NOBERT COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2023 · $10k
- CFCENTER FOR SUICIDE AWARENESS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +25%
- BCBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INCone grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -48%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.
New community shelter foundation, inc. is organized and operated for charitable, educational, religious, and scientific purposes exclusively for the benefit and support of the greater green bay community foundation, inc.
Sunshine resources of door county enriches lives to nurture and inspire the human spirit with care, compassion, partnership and integrity.
Guardianship services, inc. (gsi) answers the call to protect tarrant county's vulnerable adults from abuse, neglect and exploitation with services ranging from guardianship to money management, victim advocacy and financial literacy…
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…
Harwood place, inc. is dedicated to serving older adults and enriching the lives of those we touch by providing compassionate and loving care.
To provide therapeutic, preventative, and restorative care to our residents that will assist them to obtain and maintain an optimum level of health and well-being.
A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…
The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
Gabriel's villa is part of a family of healthcare and residential service organizations committed to providing quality care and life enriching opportunities to the aging and those in need in a caring, christian environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Reading Connections Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds MEDIATION CENTER OF GREATER GB INC ↗
- Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds AGING AND DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF BROWN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGINC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRO INC ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds ALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds RIBBON OF HOPE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND HOSPICE MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
- Who funds JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE 2 ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE HOME HEALTH CARE LLC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization De Pere Christian Outreach funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to De Pere Christian Outreach?
Find your warmest path to De Pere Christian Outreach through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.