· Private foundation
Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of LITTLE RAPIDS CORPORATION - EGAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $211k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GATEWAY COLLECTIVEST JOHN'S MINISTRIES | $33,334 |
| SHAWANO COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC | $25,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA | $24,000 |
| DOMESTIC ABUSE SUPPORT CENTER OF SHAWANO COUNTY INC | $15,000 |
| MANDOLIN FOUNDATION LLC | $15,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BAY & LAKES REGION | $15,000 |
| SHAWANO JAZZ FOUNDATION | $13,200 |
| CENTER FOR SUICIDE AWARENESS | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SHAWANO | $10,000 |
| NE WI RUGBY FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| SHAWANO MENOMINEE RESILIENCY COALITION | $10,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| HOUSE OF HOPE GREEN BAY INC | $10,000 |
| ST MICHAEL'S CHURCH FOOD PANTRY | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCShawano County Arts Council Inc2× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +260% · 34% of their budget
- BTBRIDGE THE GAP INC7× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue ×11
- JNJACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC2× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- PRPINK RIBBON GOOD INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +41%
- SHSAFE HAVEN - SHAWANOone grant, 2017 · $25k
- V1VETERANS 1ST OF NEW INCone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sunshine resources of door county enriches lives to nurture and inspire the human spirit with care, compassion, partnership and integrity.
Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.
The purpose of neighborhood housing services of southeast wisconsin, inc. is to renew pride, restore confidence,promote reinvestment, and revitalize the nhs neighborhoods through the efforts of local residents acting in concert with…
None
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
To build healthy communities by empowering individuals and families through innovative substance abuse prevention and intervention resources. this is done by providing effective programs and resources that build communities free from…
The mission of women and children's horizons, inc. is to provide support, shelter, education, training, and healing services to victims of sexual and domestic abuse, their families, and the community.
New community shelter foundation, inc. is organized and operated for charitable, educational, religious, and scientific purposes exclusively for the benefit and support of the greater green bay community foundation, inc.
Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.
To provide shelter, crisis intervention, and supportive services for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse and their families, with a commitment to safety, respect and promoting self-determination.
To provide therapeutic, preventative, and restorative care to our residents that will assist them to obtain and maintain an optimum level of health and well-being.
To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Hope Green Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Fresh Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 144 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Shawano County Arts Council Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FRESH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE THE GAP INC ↗
- Who funds PINK RIBBON GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VETERANS 1ST OF NEW INC ↗
- Who funds NAVARINO NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC ↗
- Who funds SHAWANO SKI SHARKS ↗
- Who funds CASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SERVICE LEAGUE OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUTOMOBILE GALLERY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE SUPPORT CENTER OF SHAWANO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BAIRD CREEK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHAWANO CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Ruby's Heart ↗
- Who funds Mandolin Foundation Limited ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · Brown County United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.