· Private foundation
K C Stock Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k26 grants · $89k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $450k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $550k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY ICE CENTER | $250,000 |
| CITY OF DE PERE PARK RECREATION & FORESTRY | $100,000 |
| BELLIN COLLEGE OF NURSING | $100,000 |
| GOLDEN HOUSE | $50,000 |
| TWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD | $50,000 |
| THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS | $50,000 |
| ON BROADWAY | $50,000 |
| ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NORTHEASTERN WISCONSIN | $50,000 |
| BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS | $35,000 |
| NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER | $30,000 |
| FRIENDS OF PALS YOUTH AND FAMILIES | $30,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER GREEN BAY | $25,000 |
| NORTHLAKES COMMUNITY CLINIC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $451k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
53 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $791k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EEEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY4× · 2021–2024 · $140k · revenue +25%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +24%
- ULUNITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- MSMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $500k
- MSMontana State University Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +141%
- SHSYBLE HOPP SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…
The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
Guardianship services, inc. (gsi) answers the call to protect tarrant county's vulnerable adults from abuse, neglect and exploitation with services ranging from guardianship to money management, victim advocacy and financial literacy…
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.
The mission of the greater green bay community foundation, inc. is to inspire and encourage charitable giving in northeast wisconsin by connecting caring people with solutions that strengthen our community.
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…
As followers of christ, hope haven's mission is to empower individuals with disabilities through work and life skills so that they may enjoy a productive life in their community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Twin Bridge Rescue Squad Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRO INC ↗
- Who funds UNITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGINC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC ↗
- Who funds ON BROADWAY INC ↗
- Who funds ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC ↗
- Who funds CUP O JOY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN BRIDGE RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds BELLIN COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds COMBATTING HOMELESSNESS & DEPENDENCY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PALS YOUTH AND FAM INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGEREADY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization K C Stock Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to K C Stock Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to K C Stock Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.