· Private foundation
Rea Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $144k
- $10k–50k144 grants · $2.5M
- $50k–250k32 grants · $2.6M
- $250k+1 grant · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIDLAND ISD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $350,000 |
| SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC | $150,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS | $150,000 |
| MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST | $150,000 |
| ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $150,000 |
| TRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS | $150,000 |
| MARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY | $135,000 |
| ELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM OF THE PERMIAN | $100,000 |
| ARTS COUNCIL OF MIDLAND | $100,000 |
| HISPANIC CULTURE CENTER OF MIDLAND | $100,000 |
| MIDLAND FESTIVAL BALLET | $80,000 |
| MIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC | $80,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $80,000 |
| SCHREINER UNIVERSITY | $75,000 |
| LEVELLAND WALLACE THEATER | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $411k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
197 repeat relationships — 134 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 71 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST4× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +36% · 29% of their budget
- MIMIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2024 · $950k · revenue +207%
MARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY4× · 2020–2024 · $585k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- SRSTANDING ROOM ONLYone grant, 2023 · $350k
- LSLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +31%
- TFThe Fields Edgeone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
American baroque opera company operates in the state of texas for the primary purpose of furthering the appreciaton of music, particularly opera, for the general public. american baroque opera company performs select operas throughout the…
TexARTS is an arts education and performance destination that builds character, professionalism, and careers. Its mission is to cultivate a thriving arts community by exposing all people to the visual and performing arts. TexARTS prepares…
To shape the future of classical music by energizing, modernizing, and personalizing the concert experience.
Increase community involvement to advance music and art through education events and our TechNotes curriculum, group collaborations, film and instrument competitions, performance jobs, and general public concerts
Founded in 1993, American Festival for the Arts (AFA) provides high quality community-based music education programs and performance opportunities designed primarily for youth and, through its concert series and outreach, seeks to broaden…
The mission of the texarkana symphony orchestra, inc. is to pursue, for all, the transformative power of symphonic music through excellence in live permormance and education.
The mission of HGO is to enrich our diverse community through the art of opera. We will do so by creating, curating, exploring, and producing outstanding experiences centered around the human voice.(Continued on Schedule O)
To share the experience of chamber music through live performance and community engagement
The Austin Chamber Music Center creates chamber music experiences that connect, educate, and inspire our community.
The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…
To create theater that challenges its audience to think and its artists to grow. We accomplish this by presenting an articulate and compelling product in an intimate setting, creating employment for Houston-based artists, and memorable…
The mission of the Tucson Symphony is to build and enrich community through the experience of live music of the highest quality.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cedar Park Public Library Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
315 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 315 of the 360 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF MIDLAND ↗
- Who funds ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Midland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER OF MIDLAND ↗
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN OPERA ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND FESTIVAL BALLET ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds ELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
- Who funds CASSATT IN THE BASIN ↗
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS ↗
- Who funds ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Fort Worth Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BALLET LUBBOCK ↗
- Who funds LEVELLAND WALLACE THEATER ↗
- Who funds Schreiner University ↗
- Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds Lubbock Community Theatre ↗
- Who funds Hillcrest School Inc ↗
- Who funds EMPIRE STATE YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARFA PUBLIC RADIO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The West Texas Jazz Society Inc ↗
- Who funds BALLET ARTISTS OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
- Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Fmh Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Beal Foundation · Yarborough Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rea Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Gaylord Hospital Inc — 6% of income from government
- Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras Inc — 1% of income from government
- Friends of Chamber Music — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rea Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Rea Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.