Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pink House Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2020
35
Grants FY2020
19
States reached
$162k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of Pink House Foundation Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Pink House Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 23 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

19
’17
30
’18
23
’19
23
’20
6
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Civil Rights$2.3MPhilanthropy$568kCrime & Legal$461kCommunity Improvement$441kEmployment$440kYouth Development$283kPublic Benefit$220kHousing & Shelter$162kOther$0
02FY2020 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k6 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $162k
$40,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Movement for Black Lives Fund$162,000
One DC$42,000
Owe Aku Intl Justice Project$40,000
TGI Justice Project$40,000
Racial Justice Action Center$40,000
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human R$40,000
Empower DC$40,000
Puente Human Rights Movement$40,000
Providence Youth Student Movement$40,000
Voz Workers Rights Education Projec$40,000
Black Mesa Water Coalition$40,000
The Icarus Project$40,000
Southwest Workers Union$40,000
Families for Freedom$40,000
Youth Rise Texas$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $482k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Georgia Latino Allian for Human Rig: $40k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $40k → 14%Puente Human Rights Movement: $40k → 11%Georgia Latino Alliance for Human R: $40k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $40k → 14%Puente Human Rights Movement: $40k → 11%Georgia Latino Allian for Human Rig: $40k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $40k → 14%Puente Human Rights Movement: $40k → 11%Georgia Latino Alliance for Human R: $40k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $40k → 14%Puente Human Rights Movement: $40k → 11%SisterSong: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
PA
CT
RI
CA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 33 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
24

Total granted

$4.7M
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+51%

Still filing today

67%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Civil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    Miami Workers Center Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $200k · revenue +48%
  • SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $200k · revenue +41%
  • GL
    GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $160k · revenue +684%

Funded once

  • VW
    Voz Worker Right Ed Proj
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • ND
    National Day Laborer Organizing Net
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • National Domestic Workers Alliance Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +125%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
3
Florida Rising Inc

Florida rising, inc. is an independent political organization bringing together black and brown communities to seize power and govern to advance social, economic and racial justice across florida.

Civil Rights
4
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
5
Tenants and Workers United

Tenants and workers united is a democratically controlled, grassroots organization committed to winning social and economic justice for all people in northern virginia-latinos, african americans, tenants, immigrants, workers, youth and low…

Arts & Culture
6
Border Workers United

A community-based organization that develops leadership of workers to construct a movement of worker families in the texas borderlands.

—
7
Showing Up for Racial Justice Inc

Showing Up for Racial Justice (SURJ) is a national organization that brings hundreds of thousands of white people into fights for racial and economic justice. For too long, people at the top have hoarded wealth and power by using strategic…

—
8
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
9
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment
10
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
11
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
12
Oficina Legal Del Pueblo Unido Inc

We are texas lawyers for texas communities, boldly serving the movement for equality and justice in and out of the courts.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Undocublack Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Body Positive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
31/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Movement for Black Lives Fund: $372,000 · OtherMovement for Black Lives FundSOUTHWEST PUBLIC WORKERS' UNION: $200,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST PUBLIC WORKERS' UNIONGrassroots Global Justice Alliance: $160,000 · OtherGrassroots Global Justice AllianceOwe Aku Intl Justice Project: $160,000 · OtherOwe Aku Intl Justice ProjectBlack Mesa Water Coalition: $160,000 · OtherBlack Mesa Water CoalitionInquilinxs Unidxs por Justicia: $160,000 · OtherInquilinxs Unidxs por JusticiaThe Icarus Project: $160,000 · OtherThe Icarus ProjectMigrant Justice Justicia Migrante: $120,000 · OtherProject Hajra: $120,000 · OtherDream Defenders: $120,000 · OtherSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $160,000 · OtherSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INCORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY: $162,000 · OtherORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY+26 more: $380,500 · Other+26 moreJOLT INITIATIVE: $200,000 · Civil RightsJOLT INITIATIVESOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $200,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GR…FAMILIES FOR FREEDOM INC: $160,000 · Civil RightsFAMILIES FOR FREEDOM …SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $120,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING …BYP100 Education Fund: $120,000 · Civil RightsBYP100 Education FundRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $70,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CITY ALL…UNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsGRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE: $40,000 · Civil Rights+4 more: $74,000 · Civil Rights+4 moreAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $400,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated…Dignity and Power Now: $160,000 · PhilanthropyDignity and…+2 more: $8,500 · PhilanthropyGEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $160,000 · Human ServicesGEORGIA LA…PUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT: $160,000 · Human ServicesPUENTE HUM…Latino Union of Chicago: $160,000 · Human ServicesLatino Uni…+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesMiami Workers Center Inc: $200,000 · EmploymentVOZ WORKERS RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT: $160,000 · EmploymentYouth Rise Texas Inc: $160,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT: $120,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentEMPOWER DC: $160,000 · Community ImprovementNEW HAVEN RISING INC: $80,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $3,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,434,500Civil Rights$1,034,000Philanthropy$568,500Human Services$482,000Employment$360,000Youth Development$280,500Community Improvement$243,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $400,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMiami Workers Center Inc: $200,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetSOUTHWEST PUBLIC WORKERS' UNION: $200,000 over 5y, 87% of budgetJOLT INITIATIVE: $200,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $200,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY: $162,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetGEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $160,000 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetFAMILIES FOR FREEDOM INC: $160,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetYouth Rise Texas Inc: $160,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetDignity and Power Now: $160,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $160,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVOZ WORKERS RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT: $160,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetPUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT: $160,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetEMPOWER DC: $160,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetLatino Union of Chicago: $160,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT: $120,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $120,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetBYP100 Education Fund: $120,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetNEW HAVEN RISING INC: $80,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $70,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE: $40,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBLACK ALLIANCE FOR JUST IMMIGRATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRESOURCE GENERATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALCOHOL JUSTICE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISTERSONG INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DUECES LIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGroundswell Fund: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Body Positive: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaint Petersburg Preservation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Miami Workers Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST PUBLIC WORKERS' UNION ↗
  • Who funds JOLT INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FOR FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Rise Texas Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dignity and Power Now ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds VOZ WORKERS RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER DC ↗
  • Who funds Latino Union of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BYP100 Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAVEN RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds UNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC38.9× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Tides Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Solidaire Network Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Heising-Simons Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Tides Center · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pink House Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pink House Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Voz Workers Rights Education Project: 12% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pink House Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pink House Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pink House’s filings →

More from the funding graph