· Private foundation
Pink House Foundation Inc
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
59% of Pink House Foundation Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Pink House Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 23 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k6 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k1 grant · $162k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Movement for Black Lives Fund | $162,000 |
| One DC | $42,000 |
| Voz Workers Rights Education Projec | $40,000 |
| Inquilinxs Unidxs por Justicia | $40,000 |
| Jolt Initiative | $40,000 |
| Grassroots Global Justice Alliance | $40,000 |
| Dignity and Power Now | $40,000 |
| Families for Freedom | $40,000 |
| BYP 100 Education Fund | $40,000 |
| Miami Workers Center | $40,000 |
| The Icarus Project | $40,000 |
| TGI Justice Project | $40,000 |
| Racial Justice Action Center | $40,000 |
| Georgia Latino Alliance for Human R | $40,000 |
| Empower DC | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $482k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MWMiami Workers Center Inc5× · 2017–2021 · $200k · revenue +48%
SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC5× · 2017–2021 · $200k · revenue +41%- SASOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC4× · 2017–2020 · $160k · revenue +490%
Funded once
- VWVoz Worker Right Ed Projone grant, 2017 · $40k
National Domestic Workers Alliance Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +125%- NDNational Day Laborer Organizing Netone grant, 2017 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…
Florida rising, inc. is an independent political organization bringing together black and brown communities to seize power and govern to advance social, economic and racial justice across florida.
Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…
Tenants and workers united is a democratically controlled, grassroots organization committed to winning social and economic justice for all people in northern virginia-latinos, african americans, tenants, immigrants, workers, youth and low…
A community-based organization that develops leadership of workers to construct a movement of worker families in the texas borderlands.
Showing Up for Racial Justice (SURJ) is a national organization that brings hundreds of thousands of white people into fights for racial and economic justice. For too long, people at the top have hoarded wealth and power by using strategic…
The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.
We are texas lawyers for texas communities, boldly serving the movement for equality and justice in and out of the courts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Undocublack Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Body Positive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST PUBLIC WORKERS' UNION ↗
- Who funds JOLT INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Miami Workers Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY ↗
- Who funds Youth Rise Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FOR FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds Dignity and Power Now ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds VOZ WORKERS RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds Latino Union of Chicago ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER DC ↗
- Who funds BYP100 Education Fund ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds NEW HAVEN RISING INC ↗
- Who funds RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds MIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Tides Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Solidaire Network Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Heising-Simons Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Tides Center · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pink House Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Voz Workers Rights Education Project — 12% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pink House Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Pink House Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.