Loading…
Loading…
Connecticut · Nonprofit
NEW HAVEN RISING INC (Connecticut) is funded by 5 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,703,671 in grants to it, the largest being UNITE HERE 34 LOCAL FUE ($1,425,571). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
NEW HAVEN RISING INC has grown faster than half of the 11,157 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,157 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
98% of NEW HAVEN RISING INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (59% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $40k → $337k.
From the IRS filings of NEW HAVEN RISING INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
NEW HAVEN RISING INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 84% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 44% · 2020 100% · 2021 80% · 2022 96% · 2023 100% · 2024 97% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
NEW HAVEN RISING INC is locally rooted: 86% of its grant income comes from Connecticut funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 205 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
78% of spending goes to programs.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing