· Public charity
PHS Commissioned Officers Foundation for the
Building leadership in public health through advocacy, education, research partnership and program support.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $100,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $129,605 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $29,605 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Monitor My Health Inc | $10,000 |
| The Keala Foundation | $10,000 |
| No More Under | $10,000 |
| The Family Place Utah | $10,000 |
| The Yay Foundation | $10,000 |
| Altru Foundation | $10,000 |
| Hands on Personal Empowerment | $9,000 |
| Albuquerque Health Care for the Hom | $8,250 |
| Achievement Centers for Children an | $8,250 |
| Ascension Wisconsin Foundation | $7,500 |
| Jefferson Healthcare | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHATHAM COUNTY SAFETY NET PLANNING COUNCIL2× · 2022–2024 · $19k · revenue +184%
- COCENTRAL OKLAHOMA AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH COUNCIL INC2× · 2021–2022 · $18k · revenue +88%
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER COALITION2× · 2020–2022 · $18k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- KHKLAMATH HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +1%
- CCCHEROKEE COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES COUNCILone grant, 2022 · $10k
Refugee Development Centergraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the coalition of community health clinics is to improve healthcare for vulnerable populations residing in the portland-metro area. we strengthen community clinics, promote health equity, and foster collaboration across the…
To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.
Community Health Partnership advocates for quality, affordable, accessible and culturally competent health care systems that demonstrate respect and compassion for our diverse communities.
Mental health cooperative inc. (mhc) provides integrated health services that include behavioral health care, primary health care, addiction services, and community-based care management. mhc also provides emergency psychiatric services…
The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…
We recognize the diversity of the communities we serve and we are guided by our vision and commitment towards providing excellent primary care to our patients and their families. see schedule o for more information.
Provide free health services through a range of care. care provided includes primary care, behavioral and mental health services, substance abuse counseling, and medication management. a community of volunteers provides services to adults,…
CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.
We are and Agency created on the fundamental value that strengthening one family at a time will transform our community as a whole. we believe that all people should have access to behavioral healt servicesa and to live a fulfilling life.…
To improve access to quality health and dental care for low-income uninsured men, women, and children in Utah County.
Progressive Community Health Centers exists to improve the health and quality of life of the community by providing culturally competent services that addresses identified needs.
We serve communities by embracing the strengths and experiences of individuals and families, engaging them to achieve health and well-being.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Massachusetts Training Consortium Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yay Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHATHAM COUNTY SAFETY NET PLANNING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL OKLAHOMA AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER COALITION ↗
- Who funds MONITOR MY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds KLAMATH HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Refugee Development Center ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE ↗
- Who funds BOOST OREGON ↗
- Who funds ROSA ES ROJO INC ↗
- Who funds Yay Foundation ↗
- Who funds CAHABA MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES BUILDING LASTING EQUALITY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds THE CHALDEAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALTRU HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Not One More Project ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds NO MORE UNDER ↗
- Who funds KINDERSMILE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MICHAEL GLYNN MEMORIAL COALIATION ↗
- Who funds KEYA FOUNDATION LLC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds SEVEN VALLEYS HEALTH COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds San Mateo County Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS TRAINING CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds ULTIMATE HAWAIIAN TRAIL RUN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PATIENT ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COALITION RX INC ↗
- Who funds Siouxland Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds Health Outreach Prevention Education Inc ↗
- Who funds Community Health Coalition ↗
- Who funds Safe Kids Kansas Inc ↗
- Who funds OUR MINDS MATTER ↗
- Who funds CONNECTEDLY ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING ↗
- Who funds A MOMENT OF MAGIC INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SANDHILLS INC ↗
- Who funds MINORITY ORGAN AND TISSUE TRANSPLANT EDUCATION PROGRAM OF CLEVELAND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · CareQuest Institute for Oral Health Inc · Carequest Foundation Inc · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Americares Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization PHS Commissioned Officers Foundation for the funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Washington Central Friends of Education Inc — 56% of income from government
- Mayes County Hope Coalition — 45% of income from government
- Monitor My Health Inc — 36% of income from government
- Boost Oregon — 22% of income from government
- Klamath Health Partnership Inc — 20% of income from government
- Central Oklahoma American Indian Health Council Inc — 5% of income from government
- Youth Crisis Center Inc — 4% of income from government
- Kindersmile Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- Choices Clinics Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.