Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Perkins-Prothro Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
124
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$6.0MHealth$1.6MArts & Culture$1.3MReligion$1.2MHuman Services$795kRecreation & Sports$469kPhilanthropy$272kFood & Nutrition$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 124 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k97 grants · $258k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $362k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $325k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$3,200
Median grant
14
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wichita Falls ISD Foundation$500,000
YMCA$333,333
Hospice of Wichita Falls$316,666
Sweet Briar College$125,000
Southern Methodist University$72,200
First United Methodist Church$67,500
Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra$60,000
Midwestern State University$40,000
Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra$39,000
Midwestern State University$30,000
Uplift Education$26,666
Cimarron Heritage Center$25,000
Sweet Briar College$22,500
Clemson University$20,000
Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra$18,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $350k → 9%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $7k → 7%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $317k → 9%Easter Seals New Hampshire: $7k → 7%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $13k → 9%Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas: $20k → 14%Easter Seals New Hampshire: $7k → 7%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $667 → 7%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $550 → 9%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $500 → 9%Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf Dallas: $11k → 14%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $500 → 9%Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas: $10k → 14%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $417k → 16%Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas: $8k → 14%Gifford Youth Achievement Center: $3k → 12%Gifford Youth Achievement Center: $3k → 12%Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf Dallas: $7k → 14%The Kitchen: $8k → 16%YMCA of Wichita Falls: $3k → 16%SM Wright Foundation: $8k → 14%United Regional Health Care Foundation: $1k → 16%SM Wright Foundation: $7k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $5k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $5k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $2k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $2k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $2k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $2k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $1k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $1k → 14%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $333k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $300k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $13k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $13k → 16%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $6k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $2k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $2k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $2k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $2k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $1k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $1k → 16%Presbyterian Manor: $1k → 16%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $700 → 16%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $550 → 16%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $500 → 16%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $400 → 16%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MT
NY
MA
IA
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Perkins-Prothro Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Perkins-Prothro Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 97 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

97 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
81

Total granted

$11M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+31%

Still filing today

66%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +18%
  • SU
    SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $616k · revenue +12%
  • WF
    Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra
    5× · 2020–2024 · $574k · revenue +80% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • WF
    WFISD Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M
  • CM
    Cimarron Memorial Hospital
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • UO
    US Olympic & Paralympic Fnd
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

4
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Scott & White Healthcare Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), to encourage broad-based public support of the healthcare system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
6
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
9
The Shakespeare Festival of Dallas dba Shakespeare Dallas

Using Shakespeare's works as a cornerstone, Shakespeare Dallas serves the Southwest region with fun and accessible indoor and outdoor theatre, integrated school programs, and cultural enrichment for people of all ages and backgrounds.

10
Scott & White Hospital-Marble Falls

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
12
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Christian Youth CampsCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesLocal History MuseumsElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity College Foundatio…Addiction Recovery ServicesDance Arts OrganizationsYouth Sports ProgramsMilitary Veterans SupportEquine Therapy ProgramsDevelopmental Disabilities …Animal Rescue and ShelterSchool District FoundationsCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesCommunity Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%2%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr10%31%35–55yr13%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr10%42%35–55yr13%38%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/135
the rest of the field
15%
20,231/136,669

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

120 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 120 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
117/120
Grantees still filing
82/120
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Wichita Falls ISD Foundation — $3,031,250 · OtherWichita Falls ISD FoundationFirst United Methodist Church — $1,052,100 · OtherFirst United Methodist ChurchWFISD Foundation — $1,000,000 · OtherWFISD FoundationYMCA — $616,333 · OtherYMCAMidwestern State University — $333,446 · Other+125 more — $1,430,244 · Other+125 moreHospice of Wichita Falls Inc — $1,438,818 · Human ServicesHospice of Wichit…Presbyterian Manor Inc — $334,550 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Mano…+7 more — $129,229 · Human Services+7 moreSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY — $615,500 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN U…Southern Methodist University — $411,825 · EducationSouthern Metho…SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE — $283,542 · EducationSWEET BRIAR IN…UPLIFT EDUCATION — $94,998 · EducationUPLIFT EDUCATI…HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $87,619 · EducationHIGHLAND PARK …+13 more — $103,514 · Education+13 moreWichita Falls Symphony Orchestra — $573,783 · Arts & CultureUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA — $105,490 · Arts & CultureArts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc — $72,705 · Arts & CultureWICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $36,558 · Arts & Culture+21 more — $136,382 · Arts & CultureWichita Falls Area Community Foundation — $73,000 · PhilanthropyHANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND — $64,013 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $26,664 · PhilanthropyQUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC — $23,330 · Philanthropy+5 more — $9,033 · PhilanthropyYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $51,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $29,998 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentEMANCIPET INC — $25,000 · AnimalsSPCA of Texas — $20,000 · AnimalsThe Frank Buck Zoological Society — $15,150 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $10,000 · AnimalsOPERATION KINDNESS — $4,000 · Animals+1 more — $2,000 · Animals
Other$7,463,373Human Services$1,902,597Education$1,596,998Arts & Culture$924,918Philanthropy$196,040Environment$90,998Animals$76,150

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHospice of Wichita Falls Inc — $1,438,818 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY — $615,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWichita Falls Symphony Orchestra — $573,783 over 5y, 28% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $411,825 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPresbyterian Manor Inc — $334,550 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE — $283,542 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA — $105,490 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION — $94,998 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $87,619 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWichita Falls Area Community Foundation — $73,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetArts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc — $72,705 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetHANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND — $64,013 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc — $56,135 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN AREA ART FROM THE STREETS — $51,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $51,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $36,558 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetSM Wright Foundation — $34,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK — $33,769 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGuadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation — $31,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION — $31,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $29,998 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWICHITA COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY DBA KELL HOUSE HERITAGE CENTER — $26,903 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $26,664 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMANCIPET INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCIMARRON HERITAGE CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetEDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES INC — $23,400 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetQUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC — $23,330 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS — $22,052 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWOFFORD COLLEGE — $20,666 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc — $20,665 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $19,666 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetZAVALA HISPANIC CULTURAL INITIATIVE — $17,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetThe Frank Buck Zoological Society — $15,150 over 5y, 12% of budgetLETOT CENTER CAPITAL FOUNDATION — $14,919 over 3y, 37% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM — $14,166 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC — $13,868 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $13,332 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CURE STARTS NOW INC — $13,331 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY — $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Health Care System — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALHART VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $10,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAL-EARTH INC — $8,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University
  • Who funds Presbyterian Manor Inc
  • Who funds SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA
  • Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation
  • Who funds Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc
  • Who funds HANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc
  • Who funds AUSTIN AREA ART FROM THE STREETS
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds SM Wright Foundation
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation
  • Who funds VINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds WICHITA COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY DBA KELL HOUSE HERITAGE CENTER
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC
  • Who funds EMANCIPET INC
  • Who funds CIMARRON HERITAGE CENTER
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bryant Edwards Foundation IncTX51.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · J S Bridwell Foundation · The Fain Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · James N McCoy Foundation · Vin and Caren Prothro Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Donnell Foundation · Hazel & Henry S Grace Foundation · Hegi Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Perkins-Prothro Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • The Learning Alliance Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 215 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph