Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Parents as Teachers National Center Inc

Parents as teachers promotes the optimal early development, learning and health of children by supporting and engaging their parents and caregivers.

$525k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.

Education$745kHuman Services$620kHealth$413kCrime & Legal$115kCivil Rights$80kCommunity Improvement$65kArts & Culture$53kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $325k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF WATAUGA COUNTY INC$50,000
TENNESSEE VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC$50,000
THE PARENT CHILD CENTER OF TULSA INC$50,000
TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTIONFAMILY CENTER$50,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY$30,000
COMMUNITY BASED CARE OF BREVARD COUNTY$25,000
FRIENDS OF YOUTH - WA$25,000
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT - MAIZE$25,000
PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES$25,000
MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN$25,000
AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION$25,000
DOOR TO HOPE$25,000
CAPITAL AREA HEALTHY START COALITION INC$25,000
NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS$25,000
SHIELDS FOR FAMILIES INC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $53k → 11%NEBRASKA CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $28k → 12%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTIONFAMILY CENTER: $50k → 12%SJRC TEXAS INC: $53k → 7%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $13k → 16%FOUR OAKS FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $13k → 9%YWCA OF HIGH POINT NORTH CAROLINA INC: $13k → 16%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $25k → 14%MORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER INC: $13k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PUEBLO: $53k → 15%BUILDING FOR TOMORROW: $10k → 13%OPTIONS & ADVOCACY FOR MCHENRY COUNTY: $53k → 6%PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY: $53k → 6%COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY: $13k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF NE WISCONSIN: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Parent Centers

We deliver head start and related programs throughout southeastern az for prenatal through preschool aged children and their families. the focus of our work is: early childhood education & school readiness; health & nutrition; and parent…

Education
2
Community Coordinated Child Care Inc

To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care and education through integrated support and equitable practices.

Human Services
3
Community Partnership for Child Development

Cpcd's programs are based on the comprehensive head start model and are child and family-focused. cpcd adopts a two-generation approach that focuses on creating opportunities for, and addressing the needs of, both vulnerable young children…

Education
4
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.

Human Services
5
Coshocton County Head Start Inc

Cchs is a comprehensive family and child development program committed to providing quality services that support and nurture the families we serve. our work connects through our community as we prepare our families and children for a…

—
6
Family & Children's Council of Black Hawk County

To prevent child abuse and strengthen families.

Crime & Legal
7
The Children's Center Utah

The mission of the children's center utah is to provide comprehensive mental health care to enhance the emotional well-being of infants, toddlers, preschoolers, and their families. we are the only organization in utah and the largest in…

—
8
Children's Center

Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.

—
9
Childstrive

Childstrive builds on the relationships, strengths, and unique abilities of young children and their families by fostering social, emotional, and physical well-being so all children can flourish.

—
10
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
11
Center for Child Counseling Inc

Center for child counseling is building the foundation for playful, healthful, and hopeful living for children, families, and communities.

Education
12
Head Start Child & Family Development Pr

To provide quality comprehensive services and referrals to children and families with respect and dignity.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maternal and Child Health Consortium of Chester County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Echo Joint Agreement Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportAddiction Recovery ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Senior Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%28%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/74
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,491

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/53
Grantees still filing
17/53
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EASTERN UPPER PENINSULA ISD — $52,500 · OtherEASTERN UPPER PENINSULA ISDBATESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT — $52,500 · OtherBATESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICTMERCED COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION — $52,500 · OtherMERCED COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIONUSD 394-ROSE HILL PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $52,500 · OtherUSD 394-ROSE HILL PUBLIC SCHOOLSSUQUAMISH TRIBE — $52,500 · OtherSUQUAMISH TRIBEHENDERSON KNOX MERCER WARREN REGIONAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION #33 — $52,500 · OtherHENDERSON KNOX MERCER WARREN REGIONAL OFFICE OF…VALLEY CENTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS USD #262 — $52,500 · OtherVALLEY CENTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS USD #262BEGINNINGS INC — $52,500 · OtherBEGINNINGS INCTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC — $50,000 · OtherTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INCTHE CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF WATAUGA COUNTY INC — $50,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF WATAUGA COUNTY INC+22 more — $380,000 · Other+22 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PUEBLO INC — $52,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE…Options and Advocacy for Mchenry County Inc — $52,500 · Human ServicesOptions and Advocacy for …SJRC TEXAS INC — $52,500 · Human ServicesSJRC TEXAS INCCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC — $52,500 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC…PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC — $52,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY …COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION — $50,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSI…NEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY FOUNDATION — $27,500 · Human ServicesNEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME …NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Human Services+7 more — $85,000 · Human Services+7 moreHEALTHY START COALITION OF PINELLAS INC — $52,500 · HealthHEALTHY START COALIT…BEAUFORT-JASPER-HAMPTON COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SERVICES INC — $52,500 · HealthBEAUFORT-JASPER-HAMP…TENNESSEE VOICES FOR CHILDREN — $50,000 · HealthTENNESSEE VOICES FOR…MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $27,500 · HealthMATERNAL AND CHILD H…HMH HOSPITALS CORPORATION — $27,500 · HealthHMH HOSPITALS CORPOR…PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES — $25,000 · HealthPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL…COMMUNITY BASED CARE OF BREVARD INC — $25,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY BASED CARE…FRIENDS OF YOUTH — $25,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF YOUTHDOOR TO HOPE — $25,000 · HealthDOOR TO HOPESHIELDS FOR FAMILIES — $25,000 · HealthSHIELDS FOR FAMILIESCAPITAL AREA HEALTHY START COALITION INC — $25,000 · HealthCAPITAL AREA HEALTHY…+3 more — $35,000 · Health+3 morePRESCHOOL PROMISE INC — $52,500 · EducationPRESCHOOL…ORANGEBURG COUNTY FIRST STEPS TO SCHOOL READINESS PARTNERSHIP — $52,500 · EducationORANGEBUR…FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $30,000 · EducationFAMILY RE…KANSAS PARENTS AS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION — $27,500 · EducationKANSAS PA…ECHO JOINT AGREEMENT FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 · EducationECHO JOIN…PARENT POSSIBLE — $10,000 · EducationPARENT PO…Exchange Club Family Skills Center Jefferson County — $52,500 · Crime & LegalMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN — $25,000 · Crime & LegalMAINE CHILDREN'S TRUST — $10,000 · Crime & LegalStep Up Suncoast Inc — $52,500 · Community ImprovementHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $27,500 · Community ImprovementGRAYS HARBOR COUNTY CASA — $27,500 · Civil Rights
Other$900,000Human Services$475,000Health$395,000Education$185,000Crime & Legal$87,500Community Improvement$80,000Civil Rights$27,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRESCHOOL PROMISE INC — $52,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PUEBLO INC — $52,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOptions and Advocacy for Mchenry County Inc — $52,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetORANGEBURG COUNTY FIRST STEPS TO SCHOOL READINESS PARTNERSHIP — $52,500 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetStep Up Suncoast Inc — $52,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC — $52,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC — $52,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY START COALITION OF PINELLAS INC — $52,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC — $52,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetExchange Club Family Skills Center Jefferson County — $52,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetBEGINNINGS INC — $52,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBEAUFORT-JASPER-HAMPTON COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SERVICES INC — $52,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTENNESSEE VOICES FOR CHILDREN — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF WATAUGA COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LAKE COUNTY INC — $27,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $27,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGUADALUPE CENTER EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC — $27,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $27,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetKANSAS PARENTS AS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION — $27,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetChildrens Aid Society in Clearfield County — $27,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY FOUNDATION — $27,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGULF COAST CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $27,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY BASED CARE OF BREVARD INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOOR TO HOPE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHIELDS FOR FAMILIES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA HEALTHY START COALITION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HIGH POINT NC INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEnemy Swim Day School — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMHP SALUD — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLYDIA PLACE — $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY FAMILY CENTER INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DELAWARE — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARENT POSSIBLE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE CHILDREN'S TRUST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Florida Association o…Annie E Casey Foundat…Feed the Children IncThe Albertsons Compan…Enterprise Holdings F…Dollar General Litera…For Inspiration and R…Share Our StrengthCharities Aid Foundat…Renaissance Charitabl…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…
Florida Association of Healthy Start CoalitionsFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Florida Association of Healthy Start Coalitions · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Feed the Children Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Share Our Strength · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Parents as Teachers National Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 58%
  • Mhp Salud — 66% of income from government
  • Step Up Suncoast Inc — 63% of income from government
  • United Way of Delaware — 58% of income from government
  • Gulf Coast Children's Advocacy Center Inc — 51% of income from government
  • Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc — 37% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home