How much did PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC grant in FY2025?

Human Services$475kHealth$395kEducation$185kCrime & Legal$88kCommunity Improvement$80kYouth Development$28kCivil Rights$28kPhilanthropy$13kSocial Science$13kOther$848k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2024

achieveoffice educationlong-termimprovingisdeveryaccess

2025

bftstrengthenmspcccollaborativeleaderbuildingmetropolitan

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k14 grants · $325k
$50k–250k4 grants · $200k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$33M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF WATAUGA COUNTY INC$50,000
TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTIONFAMILY CENTER$50,000
THE PARENT CHILD CENTER OF TULSA INC$50,000
TENNESSEE VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC$50,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY$30,000
PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES$25,000
DOOR TO HOPE$25,000
SHIELDS FOR FAMILIES INC$25,000
FRIENDS OF YOUTH - WA$25,000
NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS$25,000
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT - MAIZE$25,000
AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION$25,000
CAPITAL AREA HEALTHY START COALITION INC$25,000
MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN$25,000
COMMUNITY BASED CARE OF BREVARD COUNTY$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 62% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Child Development and Family Council of

Assist qualifying families in obtaining quality child care in the centre county, pa area.

Human Services

Community Coordinated Child Care Inc

To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care & education through integrated support & expertise.

Human Services

Ccmh Child Care Center

Providing childcare services to the community

Human Services

Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.

Human Services

Child Parent Centers

Education, health and parent engagement programs emphasizing family and community partnerships.

Education

Family & Children's Council

To prevent child abuse and strengthen families.

Crime & Legal

United Children's Services of

Children's services

Human Services

Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services

Coshocton County Head Start Inc

Cchs is a comprehensive family and child development program committed to providing quality services that support and nurture the families we serve. our work connects through our community as we prepare our families and children for a…

—

North Carolina Partnership for

Advance a high quality, comprehensive, accountable early childhood system that benefits each child in north carolina beginning with a healthy birth.

Education

Texans Care for Children Inc

Texas Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to life.

Crime & Legal

Community Connections for Children Inc

Community connections for children, inc ensures that all families have access to affordable, high quality child care choices that lead to success in school and life.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maternal and Child Health Consortium of and the most unlike its peers is Presbyterian Medical Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/74

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,491

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

53 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

51/53

Grantees still filing

47/53

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$900,000Human Services$475,000Health$395,000Education$185,000Crime & Legal$87,500Community Improvement$80,000Youth Development$27,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Florida Association of Healthy StartFL13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Florida Association of Healthy Start · Feed the Children Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Share Our Strength · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Seattle Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EXCHANGE CLUB CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 630917525 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EXCHANGE CLUB CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Parents as Teachers National Center Inc?

Find your warmest path to Parents as Teachers National Center Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

53 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Parents as Teachers National Center Inc?

More from the funding graph

PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

53 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Parents as Teachers National Center Inc?

More from the funding graph