Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT (Washington) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,026,756 to it, the largest being GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC ($1,683,400). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 83% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$11M
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$2.0M
Net assets
$6.7M
4/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 5%
01What it does

What Institute for Family Development does

Mission

The Institute for Family Development keeps children safe and families together by strengthening families through evidence based, culturally responsive, in home services for families facing safety and stability challenges. Ifd also supports high fidelity implementation of family preservation services through training, consultation, and site development.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Clinical services - ifd provided evidence based, culturally responsive, in home clinical and family support services to families whose children faced safety or stability risks, including risk of out of home placement. Services were delivered in families' homes and communities and focused on strengthening parenting capacity, improving child safety, stabilizing crises, and supporting family functioning. As part of service delivery, ifd provided concrete supports, such as assistance with basic needs (food, shelter, etc.), when necessary to promote safety and stability. (see schedule I).

    $8,576,423 spentof which $244,491 as grants$1,779,360 earned by the program
    83% of program spending
  2. Training - ifd provided training, consultation, and site development services to public and private human service agencies to support high fidelity implementation of evidence based family preservation services. Activities included model specific training, ongoing consultation, and implementation support provided to agencies and provider teams across multiple states and some countries.

    $1,562,622 spent
    15% of program spending
  3. Research and evaluation - ifd conducted program evaluation and quality assurance activities to support effective delivery of intensive family preservation services. Activities included implementation review, outcome monitoring, data analysis, and participation in quality improvement efforts to strengthen service delivery and inform practice.

    $219,675 spent
    2% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $10,358,720.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($9.3M) Expenses 100 ($8.8M) Net assets 100 ($5.3M)2018 Revenue 105 ($9.8M) Expenses 111 ($9.8M) Net assets 103 ($5.4M)2019 Revenue 105 ($9.8M) Expenses 114 ($10M) Net assets 98 ($5.2M)2020 Revenue 102 ($9.5M) Expenses 107 ($9.5M) Net assets 99 ($5.2M)2021 Revenue 96 ($9.0M) Expenses 101 ($8.9M) Net assets 104 ($5.5M)2022 Revenue 92 ($8.6M) Expenses 106 ($9.4M) Net assets 116 ($6.1M)2023 Revenue 113 ($11M) Expenses 118 ($10M) Net assets 120 ($6.4M)2024 Revenue 122 ($11M) Expenses 128 ($11M) Net assets 125 ($6.6M)2025 Revenue 123 ($11M) Expenses 131 ($12M) Net assets 127 ($6.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (123)Expenses (131)Net assets (127)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $6.3M to $8.1M (+29%).

$6.4M
$6.6M
$6.3M
$6.3M
$8.1M
$7.2M
$8.0M
$8.4M
$8.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 82% · 2018 87% · 2019 87% · 2020 86% · 2021 81% · 2022 78% · 2023 79% · 2024 83% · 2025 78%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

82% of INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (82% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 43 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$504k
’17
$58k
’18
−$276k
’19
$88k
’20
$15k
’21
−$732k
’22
$106k
’23
$69k
’24
−$85k
’25
1.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Charlotte Booth

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed141515121213161417
Joined·+1+3+0+0+2+5+2+3
No longer listed·03301240
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $160k → $475k.

3 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 83% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 8 of 9 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

83%
largest funder
94%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 80% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 84% · 2022 98% · 2023 84% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

83% of INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $343k that is directly attributable, 96% of it comes from Washington funders.

WA
MO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.7M arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT's revenue grew 23% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Months of reserve1.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 25 social science nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Organizations like INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 10%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

80%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT?
INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT (Washington) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,026,756 to it, the largest being GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC ($1,683,400). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 83% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $2,026,756 in grants to INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT?
GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC is the largest funder on record, with $1,683,400 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Institute for Family Development →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing