Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Feed the Children Inc

We are a global movement working to end child hunger in the u.s.

$360M
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$79k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

International$154k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $78,700 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $360,262,992 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $360,184,292 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$78,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$133M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE WORLDWIDE LTD$78,700
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WORLD NEIGHBORS INC: $75k → 16%HOPE WORLDWIDE LTD: $79k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
2
Messengers of Hope Mission Inc

mobile food pantry

Food & Nutrition
3
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
4
Light of the World Neighborhood and Economic Development Inc

Assist homeless, hungry, and people in low income communities.

Community Improvement
5
Our Daily Bread Christian Food Ministry Inc

The purpose of this company is to provide food to homeless and indigent families in our area.

Human Services
6
3G Food Pantry

Local food pantry serving those food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
7
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition
8
Bread of Refuge Inc

Bread of Refuge is a food pantry that distributes over 1600 banana boxes of food every month to families in need. We also feed 75-to-100 homeless people every week.

Human Services
9
Victory Life Church International

Church, religious

Religion
10
Grace Resource Center Inc

To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

Housing & Shelter
11
Food for Needy Inc
Food & Nutrition
12
God Provides Ministry

To provide free food to homeless, veterans, and others

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Soldiers of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesYouth Development CentersCommunity Food PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Ymca Youth DevelopmentSenior Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportSchool District FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Local Food System Organizat…Youth Development ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsAddiction Recovery ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportDevelopmental Disabilities …Domestic Violence ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…School Parent OrganizationsFaith-Based Social ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity FoundationsChristian Youth CampsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Cancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%6%<5yr17%11%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr14%24%20–35yr9%17%35–55yr13%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr14%51%20–35yr9%0%35–55yr13%49%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%51/1,847
the rest of the field
19%
10,941/56,454

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

830 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
211
Early backer (in before they grew)
755/830
Grantees still filing
500/830
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOPE WORLDWIDE LTD — $78,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD NEIGHBORS INC — $74,827 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Oklahoma Educational Technology TrustOK80.7× affinity51 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma Educational Technology Trust · Lesea Global Feed the Hungry Inc · Farmlink Project · Justin J Watt Foundation Inc · Love Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Means Database Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · United Movement Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Harris Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Feed the Children Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $344M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph