California · Nonprofit
DOOR TO HOPE
DOOR TO HOPE (California) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $286,004 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY ($174,827). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $6.7M
- Funders on record
- 9
- Grants received
- $286k
- Net assets
- $1.3M
What Door to Hope does
Mission
We open the Door to Hope and offer a path to recovery for those who are addicted and make the difference of a lifetime for children who have been exposed to alcohol and other drugs in the womb. We empower, support, and nurture all who walk through the door.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
On its FY2024 return the organization reported starting a significant new program.
Youth opt outpatient substance use disorder treatment for youth ages 12-17. Through comprehensive counseling, educational support, evidence-based practices, and life skills training, we strive to empower youth to overcome their difficulties and lead fulfilling lives.
Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 2).
Parents as teachers is an evidence-based family support and parent education program that promotes early childhood development and school readiness through home visitation, parent education, and connection to community resources.
$1,263,708 spent22% of program spendingSanta lucia residential treatment - a group home for monterey county teenage girls who are in placement either through juvenile court or social services and need structured services and support for substance abuse and mental health disorders.
$908,561 spent16% of program spendingWomen's residential program - a 14-bed residential program for women that treats more than 75 monterey county women annually, all of whom are indigent and/or homeless.
$797,891 spent14% of program spendingYouth opioid response - this program provides specialized medication-assisted treatment (mat) and related education and support services to youth with opioid use disorders.
$159,153 spent3% of program spendingParent mentoring services - provides trained mentors for parents who have lost custody of their children but are in the reunification process and for new foster parents, relative caregivers, and adoptive parents.
$207,562 spent4% of program spendingMcstart - a collaborative community program providing prevention, diagnostic, and treatment services for infants and young children who were exposed to alcohol or other drugs while in the womb and/or have experienced early childhood trauma.
$711,213 spent13% of program spendingIntegrated co-occurring treatment program (ict) - a program that provides intensive, home-based services for teenagers experiencing both mental health and substance abuse disorders.
$395,417 spent7% of program spendingOutpatient services - an outpatient treatment program serving both men and women with substance abuse disorders. Most outpatient referrals are from drug court, the justice assistance grant, or are serviced through drug medi-cal and are low income, indigent, and/or homeless.
$542,271 spent$26,681 earned by the program10% of program spendingPathways to safety - provides family resource specialists for early intervention for families at-risk for child welfare involvement.
$546,135 spent10% of program spendingThe youth outpatient program provides structured, evidence-based substance use treatment for adolescents ages 12-17. Services include weekly individual and group counseling focused on developing healthy coping skills and reducing substance use, while allowing participants to remain engaged in their home,school, and community environments.
$136,697 spent2% of program spending
The 10 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $5,668,608.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $2.6M to $3.3M (+28%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 97% · 2018 97% · 2019 97% · 2020 98% · 2021 99% · 2022 76% · 2023 96% · 2024 97% · 2025 97%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of DOOR TO HOPE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Christy Shannon
Executive director
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $8k → $9k.
3 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of DOOR TO HOPE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
DOOR TO HOPE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
95% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund DOOR TO HOPE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 61% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
50% of DOOR TO HOPE's funders are still giving 1 year after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
85% of DOOR TO HOPE's grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $39k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
DOOR TO HOPE's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,665 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Organizations like DOOR TO HOPE
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
84% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for DOOR TO HOPE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds DOOR TO HOPE?
- DOOR TO HOPE (California) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $286,004 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY ($174,827). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does DOOR TO HOPE have?
- IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $286,004 in grants to DOOR TO HOPE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of DOOR TO HOPE?
- UNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY is the largest funder on record, with $174,827 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like DOOR TO HOPE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Door to Hope →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing