Skip to content
Palos Verdes Junior Women's Club at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Palos Verdes Junior Women's Club

To provide funds to other charitable organizations and purposes, including providing scholarships to applicants demonstrating financial needs.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$155kHousing & Shelter$130kYouth Development$125kHuman Services$100k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $174,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $204,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$145k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE LA HARBOR$50,000
HARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES$25,000
COMMUNITY'S CHILD$24,500
PROVIDENCE TRINITY CARE FOUNDATION$20,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF THE SOUTH BAY$20,000
WE ARE BRAVE TOGETHER$15,000
TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$10,000
SOUTHBAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE SOUTH BAY: $25k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE SOUTH BAY: $20k → 14%PROVIDENCE TRINITY CARE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%PROVIDENCE TRINITY CARE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%PROVIDENCE TRINITY CARE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE SOUTH BAY: $20k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $10k → 14%WE ARE BRAVE TOGETHER: $15k → 14%WE ARE BRAVE TOGETHER: $15k → 14%SOUTHBAY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$490k · 7 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$490k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR
    3× · 2023–2025 · $125k · revenue -18%
  • CC
    COMMUNITYS CHILD INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $95k · revenue -11%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF LOS ANGELES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue -11%

Funded once

  • TN
    TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • SB
    SOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
2
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
3
Bayfront Youth and Family Services Inc

Bayfront Youth & Family Services is a quality provider of behavioral and mental health treatment services for children, adolescents, and their caregivers. Our mission is to provide a comprehensive support system that promotes safe and…

Health
4
Shine Bc-La

Provide housing and services to the most vulnerable population, especially those transitioning from (or at risk of) homelessness or institutionalization, through a variety of innovative supportive housing models.

Education
5
Harbor Community Clinic Inc

To provide quality, comprehensive, healthcare and supportive services to those in our community, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Hathaway-Sycamores Child and Family Services

Sycamores nonprofit health organization whose mission is cultivating hope and resilience to enrich the well-being of children, families, and communities through out los angeles and riverside counties.

Human Services
7
Harriett Buhai Center for Family Law

Harriett buhai center for family law is a non-profit corporation organized in 1984 that ensures meaningful access to justice in the family law system by providing free legal services, education, and advocacy for low-income residents of los…

Crime & Legal
8
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

—
9
Hamburger Home

Aviva believes every child and every family in our los angeles community deserves the chance for a brighter future. we provide compassionate support, therapeutic services and guidance to at-risk children and families.

Education
10
Raphael House of San Francisco Inc

The mission of raphael house is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness strengthen family bonds by achieving stable housing and financial independence.

Human Services
11
Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor

The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…

—
12
Bridges Community Treatment Services Inc

Bridges is a mental health and social services agency dedicated to supporting individuals facing behavioral health challenges and disorders. our mission is to restore dignity, respect, and to empower at risk children, youth, adults, and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toberman Neighborhood Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is We Are Brave Together. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
2/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY PROMISE OF LOS ANGELES: $65,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF LOS ANGELESPROVIDENCE TRINITYCARE HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesPROVIDENCE TRINITYCARE HOSPICE FOUNDAT…We Are Brave Together: $30,000 · Human ServicesWe Are Brave TogetherTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INCSOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CENTERBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS A…COMMUNITYS CHILD INC: $94,500 · HealthCOMMUNITYS CHILD INCHARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $65,000 · Housing & ShelterHARBOR INTERFA…Support for Harbor Area Womens Lives: $50,000 · OtherSupport for…
Human Services$175,000Youth Development$125,000Health$94,500Housing & Shelter$65,000Other$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR: $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITYS CHILD INC: $94,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LOS ANGELES: $65,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetHARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE TRINITYCARE HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSupport for Harbor Area Womens Lives: $50,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetWe Are Brave Together: $30,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH BAY CHILDRENS HEALTH CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Vistas for Children I…The Crail-Johnson Fou…The Green FoundationWhitney Young Childre…The Ralph M Parsons F…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Shelter Partnership I…The Rose Hills Founda…The Ahmanson Foundati…Weingart FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…
California Community FoundationCA20× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Vistas for Children Inc · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · The Green Foundation · Whitney Young Childrens Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Palos Verdes Junior Women's Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Palos Verdes Junior Women's Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Palos Verdes Junior Women's Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home