Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Osaic Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
281
Grants FY2024still arriving
43
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.

Housing & Shelter$312kEducation$256kHuman Services$189kHealth$178kPhilanthropy$136kRecreation & Sports$119kYouth Development$106kFood & Nutrition$54kOther$0
02FY2024 · 281 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k266 grants · $486k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $365k
$1,000
Median grant
43
States reached
$83k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEYOND HOUSING$150,000
VIRTUAL ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL INC$75,000
INVEST IN OTHERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$75,000
WORLD TEAM SPORTS$65,000
SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY (SEO)$37,500
SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY (SEO)$37,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$33,221
NAACP GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE$25,000
HANDSON NEW ORLEANS INC$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
ZONTA CARES OF TALLAHASSEE$10,000
FLORIDA ELKS CHILDRENS THERAPY SERVICES INC$10,000
MEMORIES FOR KIDS$10,000
PROJECT YES INC DBA YES INSTITUTE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST DELAWARE: $8k → 10%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $3k → 8%FOSTERING CHANGE INC: $1k → 11%PREPARE AND PROSPER: $1k → 14%NEW HOPE FOR FAMILIES: $2k → 15%TECH-ANGELS INC: $5k → 11%BEYOND THE SANCTUARY INC: $3k → 14%CHILDRENS GRIEF CENTER OF NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%ARC OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $1k → 10%PLACE OF HOPE AT THE LEIGHAN AND DAVID RINKER CAMPUS: $3k → 11%DOGWOOD RANCH: $3k → 8%GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $1k → 9%THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $1k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOMES OF IREDELL COUNTY: $3k → 9%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $3k → 12%BOB'S BIG GIVE: $825 → 7%MUST MINISTRIES INC: $2k → 8%OUTFITTERS INC: $825 → 15%ANNE GRADY SERVICES: $825 → 18%MULTISPORT 360 INC: $3k → 18%THE ARC OF LOUDOUN: $3k → 4%HANDSON NEW ORLEANS INC: $15k → 23%BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT: $3k → 11%CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST DELAWARE: $3k → 10%FAMILIES FIRST: $3k → 8%FOSTERING CHANGE INC: $800 → 11%TODAY IS A GOOD DAY: $2k → 7%SURVIVORS OF TORTURE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM DBA WESST: $3k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOMES OF IREDELL COUNTY: $2k → 9%MULTI-SPORT 360: $2k → 18%MARKLUND CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 8%THE ARC OF LOUDOUN: $2k → 4%BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT: $3k → 11%TODAY IS A GOOD DAY: $2k → 7%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BUFFALO: $625 → 13%DOGWOOD RANCH CORP: $2k → 15%STEPUP MINISTRY: $3k → 8%SPECIAL TREASURES OF IREDELL COUNTY INC: $2k → 9%JAMBOS: $1k → 9%MARKLUND CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 8%CROSSROADS4HOPE: $5k → 5%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $2k → 11%NOURISHPHX: $11k → 11%THE BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%MEMORIES FOR KIDS: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$747k · 106 repeat orgs$898k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

106 repeat relationships — 106 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 164 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
167

Total granted

$747k
$274k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+10%

Still filing today

74%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $624k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VE
    VIRTUAL ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $85k · revenue +15%
  • EXPERIENCE CAMPS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +124%
  • TB
    THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $14k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • MU
    METRO UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +4%
  • KB
    KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +48%
  • TU
    THE UMBRELLA CLUB INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
2
The Home for Little Wanderers Inc

To help vulnerable children and their families build permanent, positive change.

Human Services
3
Guardianship Services Inc

Guardianship services, inc. (gsi) answers the call to protect tarrant county's vulnerable adults from abuse, neglect and exploitation with services ranging from guardianship to money management, victim advocacy and financial literacy…

Human Services
4
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
5
Youth Homes

The mission of youth homes is to help every youth feel safe, have a sense of belonging, and find a place to call home.

Human Services
6
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
7
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
8
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
9
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.

Human Services
10
Advocates for Children Inc Casa of the Sabine Neches Region

Advocacy for abused children

Civil Rights
11
Childserve Inc

We partner with families to help children with special health care needs live a great life.

—
12
Cornerhouse

The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tech-Angels Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Equine Therapy ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…Elementary Literacy TutoringYmca Youth DevelopmentLocal History MuseumsYouth Mentoring ProgramsPregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Social ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportSchool District FoundationsCancer Support ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Construc…Senior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Community FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Independent K-12 SchoolsLgbtq+ Community SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsCommunity Arts CentersChristian Youth CampsFood Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…Animal Rescue and Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%2/322
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,243

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

274 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 274 of the 442 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
31
Early backer (in before they grew)
269/274
Grantees still filing
140/274
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $43,221 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYNAACP GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE — $25,000 · OtherZONTA CARES OF TALLAHASSEE — $17,500 · Other+119 more — $431,275 · Other+119 moreBEYOND HOUSING INC — $250,000 · Housing & ShelterBEYOND HOUSING INCMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS — $10,500 · Housing & Shelter+6 more — $30,400 · Housing & Shelter+6 moreVIRTUAL ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL INC — $85,000 · EducationVIRTUAL ENTERPRIS…SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $75,000 · EducationSPONSORS FOR EDUC…PROJECT YESINC — $12,000 · EducationPROJECT YESINCSCHOLAR ATHLETES GLOBALLY EMERGING INC — $9,500 · Education+10 more — $36,860 · Education+10 moreHANDS ON NEW ORLEANS — $15,000 · Human ServicesHANDS ON NE…NOURISHPHX — $12,500 · Human ServicesNOURISHPHXMEMORIES FOR KIDS — $10,500 · Human ServicesMEMORIES FO…CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN AN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…Must Ministries Inc — $7,000 · Human ServicesBALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC — $5,500 · Human ServicesSURVIVORS OF TORTURE INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF LOUDOUN — $5,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOMES OF IREDELL COUNTY INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS4HOPE — $5,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM — $5,000 · Human ServicesTECH-ANGELS INCORPORATED — $5,000 · Human Services+15 more — $40,860 · Human Services+15 moreINVEST IN OTHERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · PhilanthropyMETRO UNITED WAY INC — $10,560 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $7,500 · PhilanthropyHONOR FLIGHT OF WEST CENTRAL FL INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyLA VISTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC — $13,500 · Youth DevelopmentBACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHERN NEW JERSEY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentOld Boney Mountain Foundation for Kids — $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentPENNS VALLEY YOUTH CENTER — $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentManta Ray Parents Association — $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentSUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC — $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentGO FULL STEAM INC — $2,500 · Youth Development+4 more — $8,325 · Youth DevelopmentWorld TEAM Sports — $65,000 · Recreation & SportsSINGLE TRACK RIDERS FOUNDATION — $2,625 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$516,996Housing & Shelter$290,900Education$218,360Human Services$146,360Philanthropy$112,060Youth Development$71,825Recreation & Sports$71,625

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC — $250,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetVIRTUAL ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL INC — $85,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINVEST IN OTHERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWorld TEAM Sports — $65,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHANDS ON NEW ORLEANS — $15,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC — $13,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetNOURISHPHX — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT YESINC — $12,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMETRO UNITED WAY INC — $10,560 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIES FOR KIDS — $10,500 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UMBRELLA CLUB INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Noroton Fire Department Incorporated — $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZONTA SERVICE FOUNDATION OF COLUMBUS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetBACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFIDOS FOR FREEDOM INC — $7,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEROKEE COUNTYCHEROKEE NATION COURT APPOINTED SP — $7,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetVietnamese Culture & Science Association — $7,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFeeding America — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGROVE PARK RENEWAL INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMust Ministries Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSIONS OF HONOR INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLYNN SHELTER ASSOCIATION INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSoroptimist International of Lake Oswego West Linn — $6,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetBALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT LONG ISLAND INC CO TOWN HALL — $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetPROJECT HOME AGAIN — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSURVIVORS OF TORTURE INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEEC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF LOUDOUN — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHonor Flight Northeast Indiana Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOMES OF IREDELL COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN NEW JERSEY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS4HOPE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT PITTSBURGH — $5,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

American Portfolios F…Peoples United Commun…Honor Flight IncCh Robinson Worldwide…The Lozier FoundationInvest in Others Char…Fr Bigelow FoundationDeluxe Corporation Fo…Lincoln Financial Fou…Clark Associates Char…The Sherwood Foundati…Vegas Golden Knights …
American Portfolios Foundation IncNY19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Portfolios Foundation Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation · Honor Flight Inc · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Invest in Others Charitable Foundation Inc · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Deluxe Corporation Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Osaic Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 190%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Children and Families First — 87% of income from government
  • Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Child Justice Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Association for Autism and Neurodiversity Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Girl Power Rocks Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Lynn Shelter Association Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Families First Parenting Program Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Bonnie Brae — 3% of income from government
  • CROSSROADS4HOPE — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
53report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Osaic Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Osaic Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 442 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines