Texas · Nonprofit
EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE
EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,000 to it, the largest being OSAIC FOUNDATION INC ($5,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 16,609 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 16,609 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Montgomery County Community Foundationshared funders
- 100 Women in Finance Foundationportfolio match
- Fund for Southern Communities Incportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE draws 63% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 2 states in all.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Montgomery County Community Foundationshared fundersTX · backs 15 organizations that share your funders
- 100 Women in Finance Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Fund for Southern Communities Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Association of University Women Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Amplify Her Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Go Campaignportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lumena Foundation a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Anderson Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mary's Penceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Role Model Movement Inc (NFP)portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Full of Grace Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Prosperity Denver Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Texas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
94%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE?
- EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,000 to it, the largest being OSAIC FOUNDATION INC ($5,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $8,000 in grants to EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE.
- Who is the largest funder of EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE?
- OSAIC FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $5,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like EXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2025–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing