· Public charity
Oneoc
ONEOC's mission is accelerating nonprofit success.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k45 grants · $816k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $409k
- $250k+2 grants · $633k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PATIENT SAFETY MOVEMENT FOUNDATION | $325,132 |
| TACKETT SERVICE DOGS | $308,330 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $143,325 |
| SEATTLE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ARTIST SUCCESS INSTITUTE | $90,968 |
| CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG | $75,000 |
| DISABILITY VOICES UNITED | $47,500 |
| ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION | $41,375 |
| CHOP FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| EVERFREE | $31,625 |
| PROJECT ACCESS | $26,125 |
| KCS | $25,500 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY | $25,500 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND | $25,195 |
| THE JOYFUL CHILD FOUNDATION | $23,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
77 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $435k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMIND OC2× · 2019–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +14%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · $1.6M · revenue +51%
- CVCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY7× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +230%
Funded once
- OCORANGE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLSone grant, 2020 · $544k
- USUNITED STATES ESPORTS ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $431k
- CLCONNECTED LEARNING ALLIANCEone grant, 2020 · $381k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…
Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
To transform lives and communities by providing an array of programs, all directed toward changing the lives of children in the foster care system aimed to prevent academic failure, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, sex trafficking,…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To nurture, advance and protect the health and well-being of children.
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oneoc and the most unlike its peers is The Withim Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
231 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 231 of the 251 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Patient Safety Movement Foundation ↗
- Who funds MIND OC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE OF OC ↗
- Who funds ONEOC ↗
- Who funds ANAHEIM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANAHEIM DUCKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds SERVING KIDS HOPE ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICS ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds ENVISION EXCELLENCE IN STEM EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTED LEARNING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SEA TURTLE INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA OCEAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MUSELLA FOUNDATION FOR BRAIN TUMOR RESEARCH AND INFORMATION INC ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY'S UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Florida Scholastic Esports League Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILD CREATIVITY LAB ↗
- Who funds IMPACT PHILANTHROPY GROUP ↗
- Who funds TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL (DBA PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR RESEARCH GUILD) ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER ↗
- Who funds NEMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Project Access Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Orange County's United Way · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Samueli Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Charitable Ventures of Orange County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oneoc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Center for Victims of Crime Inc — 10% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.