Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

St Joseph Health System Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$21M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$6.8M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$168MInternational$8.6MCommunity Improvement$5.5MEducation$5.4MHuman Services$4.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.9MHousing & Shelter$2.7MFood & Nutrition$1.9MOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $363k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+8 grants · $18M
$60,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$132M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER$6,800,367
ST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLC$4,951,225
MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$3,433,643
CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY$1,300,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$800,000
ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF ORANGE$467,927
PREVENTION INSTITUTE$450,000
AK LITERACY PROGRAM$280,000
UNITE OREGON$205,000
CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC$200,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA$150,000
MONTANA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH$150,000
SAMOA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$125,000
PROJECT KINSHIP$100,000
NAPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VICTOR VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $40k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $50k → 9%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 20%KHMER COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY: $60k → 9%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SAN BERNARDINO: $25k → 14%REDWOOD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $138k → 18%REDWOOD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $116k → 18%ON THE MOVE: $100k → 9%REDWOOD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY (RCAA): $60k → 18%ON THE MOVE: $84k → 9%NEW HOPE VILLAGE: $40k → 14%REDWOOD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $50k → 18%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY ACTION NAPA VALLEY: $40k → 9%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $118k → 14%VALLEY CARE COMMUNITY CONSORTIUM: $75k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $75k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $25k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REF SVC: $40k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $35k → 9%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $25k → 14%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $36k → 14%SAMOA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $125k → 12%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $40k → 9%INTERVAL HOUSE: $35k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $40k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $35k → 14%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $100k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $40k → 9%CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $60k → 9%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $40k → 9%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $51k → 9%PROJECT KINSHIP: $100k → 10%PROJECT KINSHIP: $100k → 10%DELHI CENTER: $100k → 10%YMCA OF ANAHEIM: $35k → 10%VIET RAINBOW OF ORANGE COUNTY: $50k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE: $75k → 10%CHINESE INFORMATION AND SERVICE CENTER: $27k → 9%OC UNITED TOGETHER MINISTRIES: $150k → 10%OC UNITED TOGETHER: $100k → 10%OC UNITED TOGETHER MINISTRIES: $50k → 10%OC UNITED TOGETHER MINISTRIES: $50k → 10%WOMENS TRANSISTIONAL LIVING CENTER: $40k → 10%CASA TERESA: $40k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $110k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
OR
IA
CA
VA
MD
DC
HI
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$194M · 95 repeat orgs$9.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

95 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 68 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
117

Total granted

$194M
$8.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+36%

Still filing today

85%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $635k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2019–2021 · $36M · revenue +18%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $35M · revenue +51%
  • SJ
    ST JUDE HOSPITAL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $34M · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • FP
    FLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3.8M · revenue +30%
  • HS
    HEALTH SHARE OF OREGON
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +18%
  • SM
    ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
2
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
3
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
5
Housing Works

Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.

Housing & Shelter
6
Housing Choices Coalition for Persons With Developmental Disabilities Inc

To enhance the lives of people with developmental and other disabilities by creating quality, affordable housing options.

Housing & Shelter
7
Healthright 360

To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…

—
8
Ascencia

To lift people of out homelessness, one person, one family at a time.

Housing & Shelter
9
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
10
Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc

Hope Solutions provides permanent affordable housing coupled with well-executed support services to people who are homeless or at risk to become homeless in Contra Costa County. Support services are individualized for each person or family…

Housing & Shelter
11
Mariposa Women and Family Center

The mission of mariposa women and family center is to help women and families make positive changes in their lives.

Health
12
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is Staff Nurses Association of Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Environmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportImmigrant Worker SupportJewish Community Organizati…Policy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Social ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsYmca Youth DevelopmentSenior Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Food Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr14%7%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr15%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr14%38%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr18%5%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr15%24%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/227
the rest of the field
12%
4,745/38,741

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

209 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 209 of the 227 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
52
Early backer (in before they grew)
201/209
Grantees still filing
154/209
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER — $35,951,695 · HealthCOVENANT MEDICAL CENTERST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLC — $34,641,706 · HealthST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLCST JUDE HOSPITAL — $33,792,189 · HealthST JUDE HOSPITALMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $26,578,585 · HealthMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF ORANGE — $15,458,408 · HealthST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF ORANGEST MARY MEDICAL CENTER — $6,509,930 · Health+17 more — $7,770,031 · HealthSANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $10,590,139 · OtherSANTA ROSA MEMO…SRM ALLIANCE HOSPITAL SERVICES — $3,558,778 · OtherSRM ALLIANCE HO…CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $1,990,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF…ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF EUREKA — $1,328,100 · Other+93 more — $10,054,738 · Other+93 moreFLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $3,817,155 · EducationAlaska Literacy Program Inc — $480,000 · Education+9 more — $595,000 · EducationRedwood Community Action Agency — $383,395 · Human ServicesOC UNITED TOGETHER — $370,000 · Human ServicesEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $317,500 · Human ServicesUNIDOS South OC Inc — $285,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA — $210,000 · Human ServicesON THE MOVE — $203,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT KINSHIP — $200,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $175,000 · Human Services+38 more — $2,074,070 · Human ServicesCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY — $2,966,500 · Community ImprovementORANGE COUNTY CONGREGATION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $270,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SONOMA COUNTY — $240,000 · Community ImprovementRVC SEATTLE — $240,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $120,000 · Community ImprovementPrevention Institute — $1,195,000 · Arts & CultureUNITE — $205,000 · Arts & CultureKUTTURAN CHAMORU FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $35,000 · Arts & CultureCAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $530,000 · PhilanthropyBridgeville Community Center — $150,000 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $108,750 · PhilanthropyFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $102,500 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY'S UNITED WAY — $100,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $65,000 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY GRANTMAKERS — $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Snohomish County — $50,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $63,500 · Philanthropy
Health$160,702,544Other$27,521,755Education$4,892,155Human Services$4,218,465Community Improvement$3,836,500Arts & Culture$1,535,000Philanthropy$1,369,750

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOVENANT MEDICAL CENTER — $35,951,695 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLC — $34,641,706 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE HOSPITAL — $33,792,189 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $26,578,585 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF ORANGE — $15,458,408 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $10,590,139 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetST MARY MEDICAL CENTER — $6,509,930 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM — $5,147,531 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $3,817,155 over 1y, 13% of budgetSRM ALLIANCE HOSPITAL SERVICES — $3,558,778 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY — $2,966,500 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF EUREKA — $1,328,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWESTERN HEALTHCONNECT — $1,245,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPrevention Institute — $1,195,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $750,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER — $708,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE KENNEDY COMMISSION — $572,500 over 4y, 50% of budgetCAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $530,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetREDWOOD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $494,900 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAlaska Literacy Program Inc — $480,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCope Family Center — $470,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetWestside Community Improvement Assn — $465,183 over 3y, 44% of budgetRedwood Community Action Agency — $383,395 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetOC UNITED TOGETHER — $370,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $317,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetUNIDOS South OC Inc — $285,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING — $275,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $275,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetORANGE COUNTY CONGREGATION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $270,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetGLOBAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES — $255,000 over 4y, 87% of budgetHEALTH SHARE OF OREGON — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SONOMA COUNTY — $240,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRVC SEATTLE — $240,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMONTANA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH — $235,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA — $210,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetON THE MOVE — $203,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPROJECT KINSHIP — $200,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetST MARY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetFamily Assistance Program — $195,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $175,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHigh Desert Second Chance — $170,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN REENTRY SERVICES — $160,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetWE ARE GROUNDSWELL — $152,500 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetPOVERELLO CENTER INC — $150,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBridgeville Community Center — $150,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY — $145,880 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD FORWARD INC — $133,380 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY — $130,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sisters of St Joseph …Orange County Communi…Orange County's Unite…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Farmers & Merchants B…Weingart FoundationCharitable Ventures o…Hoag Memorial Hospita…California Foundation…O L Halsell FoundationEdwards Lifesciences …Glen and Dorothy Stil…
Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare FoundationCA109.3× affinity54 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Orange County's United Way · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Charitable Ventures of Orange County · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · O L Halsell Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Glen and Dorothy Stillwell Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Joseph Health System Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
  • Access — 65% of income from government
  • Samoa Pacific Development Corporation — 28% of income from government
  • Friends of Zenger Farm — 28% of income from government
  • Center for Intercultural Organizing — 28% of income from government
  • Clatsop Community Action — 26% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
  • Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
  • El Programa Hispano Catolico — 13% of income from government
  • United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
  • Clackamas Service Center — 9% of income from government
  • Northwest Housing Alternatives — 1% of income from government
  • Health Share of Oregon — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
86report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 227 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines