· Private foundation
Numotion Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $323k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| ALS ASSOCIATION | $98,000 |
| VARIOUS 5000 | $69,098 |
| NATIONAL MS SOCIETY | $55,962 |
| MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION | $40,000 |
| HERMITAGE GOLF COURSE INV 121 | $21,501 |
| ALS NETWORK | $9,500 |
| ALS NORTHWEST | $7,500 |
| CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| ALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC | $6,000 |
| KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ALS ARIZONA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN4× · 2021–2024 · $549k · revenue +95%
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC3× · 2021–2024 · $233k · revenue +1%
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY2× · 2021–2022 · $52k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- NNUMOTIONone grant, 2022 · $81k
- SBSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAone grant, 2023 · $52k · revenue -31%
- URUkrainian Relief Projectgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +163% · 42% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
ALS Worldwide brings guidance, compassion and hope to thousands of ALS patients and their families in more than 150 countries. ALS Worldwide fills a unique niche of free counseling and information for people living with ALS/MND via…
To raise awareness, build community, improve care and find a cure for psp, cbd and msa.
Leading the fight to treat and cure ALS through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with Lou Gehrig's disease and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.
To find solutions for people living with als now and for the future by utilizing knowledge of patients, leading researchers and technology to seek immediate solutions to improve the lives of those living with als until a treatment or cure…
The mission of als united ohio is to provide comprehensive support and advocacy for people with als and their families, while advancing research for new treatments and an end to als.
The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis association's mission is to raise money to assist in finding a cure for als and to improve the lifestyle of those who have als.
SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.
NextGen ALS is entirely committed to raising funds for targeted research toward developing treatments and cures for genetic forms of ALS.
AxeALS was founded to raise awareness and funding for patient-centered treatment and cure of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
To discover treatments and a cure for als, and to serve, advocate for, and empower people affected by als to live their lives to the fullest.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sing Me a Story Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 21% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
- Who funds UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Relief Project ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hope Loves Company Inc ↗
- Who funds Sing Me A Story Foundation ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RYAN MARTIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
- Who funds ALS Network ↗
- Who funds ALS Northwest ↗
- Who funds ALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Able Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACK TROTTIER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALS Arizona ↗
- Who funds Morgan's Wonderland ↗
- Who funds INGLIS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW PERSPECTIVE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY EMPOWERMENT CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christopher Reeve Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Numotion Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Numotion Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Numotion Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.