How much does Nueva Esperanza Inc give?

Nueva Esperanza Inc reported 10 itemized grants totaling $360,786, out of $1,264,937 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 25 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Nueva Esperanza Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (64%), Education (22%), Crime & Legal (5%).

Who are Nueva Esperanza Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Housing and Family Services of Greater New York Inc ($1.2M), Eastern University ($1.2M), Esperanza Academy Charter School ($588k).

Does Nueva Esperanza Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 39% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Nueva Esperanza Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Enterprise Community Partners Inc, Local Initiatives Support Corporation, Jpmorgan Chase Foundation.

Where is Nueva Esperanza Inc based?

Nueva Esperanza Inc is based in PA.

Nueva Esperanza Inc

Nueva Esperanza Inc at a glance Mostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Nueva Esperanza Inc

The original mission of nei was to provide support to the hispanic community of north philadelphia through community development.

$1.3M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$142k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$5.0MEducation$1.7MCrime & Legal$400kReligion$260kYouth Development$152kHuman Services$136kEmployment$93kPublic Benefit$28k

02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 10 grants below total $360,786, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,264,937 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $904,151 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k3 grants · $24k
$10k–50k5 grants · $143k
$50k–250k2 grants · $193k

$30,781

Median grant

States reached

$57M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
HOUSING AND FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER NEW YORK IN	$141,862
Centro Familia Nueva Esperanza	$51,480
Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation	$39,047
Our Casas Resident Council Inc	$34,718
GREATER SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION	$30,781
Sandhills Community Action Program Inc	$20,981
Housing Help Inc	$17,734
Keystone Community Development Corporation	$9,974
Strycker's Bay Neighborhood Council Inc	$8,709
Maria Child Care LLC	$5,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $683k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$7.5M · 27 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.5M

$232k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%

-4%

Still filing today

70%

27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationRecreation & SportsReligionOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HA
HOUSING AND FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER NEW YORK INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +62%
EU
EASTERN UNIVERSITY
3× · 2018–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +68%
EA
Esperanza Academy Charter School
3× · 2017–2019 · $588k · revenue +84%

Funded once

IS
IGLESIA SINAI PENTECOSTES INC
one grant, 2019 · $88k
CANDID
one grant, 2020 · $48k · revenue -4%
CT
CORPORATION TO DEVELOP COMMUNITIES OF TAMPA INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $31k · revenue +82%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Cplc Nevada Inc

Cplc nevada, inc. is a community development corporation (cdc), committed to building stronger, healthier communities by leading advocate, coalition builder, and direct service provider. (continued on schedule o)cplc nevada, inc. promotes…

Community Improvement

Latino Economic Development Corporation

Ledc's mission is to catalyze economic advancement of latinos and local communities by bridging the gap to capital and resources to achieve financial prosperity. participants in our programs learn how to build their long-term financial…

Community Improvement

Community Housing Council

Housing & Shelter

Puerto Rico Neighborhood Housing Services Corp

Revitalize declining communities by providing financing to improve residents houses in the area. provide orientation and seminars of self help to families. provide orientation to persons in the process of foreclousure.

Housing & Shelter

Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc

Community based housing program designed to stabilize neighborhoods mainly through loans to home owners unable to obtain alternative financing and construction and rehabilitation of housing, related services include technical assistance,…

Housing & Shelter

Real Estate Education and Community Housing Inc

A HUD Approved foreclosure and housing counseling organization, and a Homefree USA affiliate, whose mission is to inspire and motivate the low to moderate income families to reach for and take the steps necessary to achieve home ownership,…

Human Services

Housing & Community Solutions Inc

—

A-1 Community Housing Services

To educate and empower the public on subjects useful to individual households, as well as being beneficial to the overall community. this housing related education is designed to assist households in making informed decisions regarding…

Human Services

Westside Neighborhood Developm

Community development via home ownership and home repair programs. financial literacy education

Community Improvement

Spanish Coalition for Housing

Sch's mission is to provide comprehensive counseling, education and housing resources necessary for latinos and other low-to-moderate income families in the chicagoland area, develop competence and responsibility in meeting their financial…

Housing & Shelter

Housing Help of San Diego

The specific purpose of Housing Help of San Diego (HHOSD) is to provide supportive services and tailored solutions with a goal of obtaining and maintaining affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter

Chicago Metropolitan Housing Dev Corp

Cmhdcs mission is to retain and develop properties with both affordable and market rate housing in the chicago metropolitan area . cmhdc targets areas vulnerable to affordable housing shortages.

Housing & Shelter

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing and Family Services of Greater New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Keystone Community Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

25/26

Grantees still filing

17/26

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Housing & Shelter$2,140,412Other$1,874,153Education$1,742,470Community Improvement$961,923Human Services$833,403Recreation & Sports$95,350Philanthropy$48,029Religion$43,787

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community Partners IncMD12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nueva Esperanza Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nueva Esperanza Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Nueva Esperanza’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home