· Public charity
Nueva Esperanza Inc
The original mission of nei was to provide support to the hispanic community of north philadelphia through community development.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $360,786 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,264,937 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $904,151 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $143k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $193k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOUSING AND FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER NEW YORK IN | $141,862 |
| Centro Familia Nueva Esperanza | $51,480 |
| Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation | $39,047 |
| Our Casas Resident Council Inc | $34,718 |
| GREATER SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $30,781 |
| Sandhills Community Action Program Inc | $20,981 |
| Housing Help Inc | $17,734 |
| Keystone Community Development Corporation | $9,974 |
| Strycker's Bay Neighborhood Council Inc | $8,709 |
| Maria Child Care LLC | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $683k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHOUSING AND FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER NEW YORK INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +62%
- EUEASTERN UNIVERSITY3× · 2018–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +68%
- EAEsperanza Academy Charter School3× · 2017–2019 · $588k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- ISIGLESIA SINAI PENTECOSTES INCone grant, 2019 · $88k
CANDIDone grant, 2020 · $48k · revenue -4%- CTCORPORATION TO DEVELOP COMMUNITIES OF TAMPA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $31k · revenue +82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cplc nevada, inc. is a community development corporation (cdc), committed to building stronger, healthier communities by leading advocate, coalition builder, and direct service provider. (continued on schedule o)cplc nevada, inc. promotes…
Ledc's mission is to catalyze economic advancement of latinos and local communities by bridging the gap to capital and resources to achieve financial prosperity. participants in our programs learn how to build their long-term financial…
Revitalize declining communities by providing financing to improve residents houses in the area. provide orientation and seminars of self help to families. provide orientation to persons in the process of foreclousure.
HOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES - Our Housing Counseling Program supports delivery of a wide variety of housing counseling services to homebuyers, homeowners, and low-to moderate-income renters. The primary objectives of the program are to…
Community based housing program designed to stabilize neighborhoods mainly through loans to home owners unable to obtain alternative financing and construction and rehabilitation of housing, related services include technical assistance,…
A HUD Approved foreclosure and housing counseling organization, and a Homefree USA affiliate, whose mission is to inspire and motivate the low to moderate income families to reach for and take the steps necessary to achieve home ownership,…
The specific purpose of Housing Help of San Diego (HHOSD) is to provide supportive services and tailored solutions with a goal of obtaining and maintaining affordable housing.
Sch's mission is to provide comprehensive counseling, education and housing resources necessary for latinos and other low-to-moderate income families in the chicagoland area, develop competence and responsibility in meeting their financial…
Community development via home ownership and home repair programs. financial literacy education
The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing and Family Services of Greater New York Inc and the most unlike its peers is Keystone Community Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOUSING AND FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds EASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Esperanza Academy Charter School ↗
- Who funds ENVISION HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Nueva Esperanza Housing and Economic Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds NEWSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP INC ↗
- Who funds DETROIT HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds MORNING STAR URBAN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds OUR CASAS RESIDENT COUNCIL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CSA SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ABLE WORKS ↗
- Who funds Esperanza Immigration Legal Services ↗
- Who funds TIMOTEO PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF SPANISH SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SANDHILLS COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Debt Management Credit Counseling Corp ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION TO DEVELOP COMMUNITIES OF TAMPA INC ↗
- Who funds CASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Housing Help Inc ↗
- Who funds KEYSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds STRYCKER'S BAY NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nueva Esperanza Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Housing Foundation of America Inc — 42% of income from government
- Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa Inc — 37% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.