Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nsf Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Food & Nutrition$217kHousing & Shelter$107kPhilanthropy$100kRecreation & Sports$99kHuman Services$65kYouth Development$45kReligion$42kHealth$34kOther$0
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$659k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REVIVE AND THRIVE PROJECT$11,300
HOME REPAIR SERVICES$11,300
Individual grant recipient$11,300
CAMP QUALITY USA INC$8,000
BOYNE CITY FOOD PANTRY$5,000
PAWS WITH A CAUSE$5,000
KIDS FOOD BASKET$4,600
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$2,000
ODYSSEY HOUSE OF UTAH$2,000
HRDC HUMAN DEVELOPMENT RESOURCE CEN$2,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $5k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $5k → 10%JUDSON CENTER: $10k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $10k → 8%REVIVE AND THRIVE PROJECT: $4k → 11%REVIVE AND THRIVE PROJECT: $11k → 11%REVIVE AND THRIVE PROJECT: $11k → 11%REVIVE AND THRIVE PROJECT: $10k → 11%REVIVE AND THRIVE PROJECT: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
NY
OH
CT
CA
UT
MD
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$586k · 27 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 19 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
18

Total granted

$586k
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+93%

Still filing today

48%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
ReligionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HR
    HOME REPAIR SERVICES OF KENT COUNTY INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $77k · revenue +78%
  • KF
    KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $61k · revenue +16%
  • RT
    Revive & Thrive Project
    5× · 2022–2026 · $40k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • IS
    INLAND SEAS EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +375%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DEL RAY
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Moveable Feast Inc

Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…

—
2
Healing Meals Foundation Corporation

Preparation and delivery of organic meals to families with a health crisis.

Food & Nutrition
3
Brighter Bites Inc

To create communities of health through fresh food. Brighter Bites seeks to improve health outcomes among children and families in under-resourced communities by using data-driven, evidence-based strategies for providing fresh produce and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Pathways Kitchen

Pathways kitchen helps justice-impacted youth thrive over survive by providing training, work opportunities and individualized support to ensure they can chart their own path forward

Crime & Legal
5
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
6
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
8
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.

Human Services
11
Kids in Distress Inc

The mission of the corporation is to prevent child abuse, preserve the family, and treat children who have been abused and neglected.

Human Services
12
Kinship Incorporated

Prevention of child abuse and neglect.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc; the most unlike its peers is Movember Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE TRUST: $100,443 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE TRUSTCAMP QUALITY: $71,240 · OtherCAMP QUALITYBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $49,700 · OtherBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACKBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GRYC: $33,800 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GRYCOPEN DOOR OUTREACH: $30,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR OUTREACHRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,340 · OtherACHIEVEMENT CENTERS: $20,000 · Other+27 more: $127,500 · Other+27 moreHOME REPAIR SERVICES OF KENT COUNTY INC: $77,040 · Housing & ShelterHOME REPAIR SER…Branch Interfaith Hospitality Network: $27,000 · Housing & ShelterBranch Interfai…Revive & Thrive Project: $40,240 · Human ServicesRevive & T…JUDSON CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesJUDSON CEN…Paws With A Cause: $10,020 · Human ServicesPaws With …KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $61,020 · Food & NutritionKIDS' FOO…GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $6,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS …CHOSEN VISION INC: $23,000 · ReligionBENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $3,000 · ReligionChristians Reaching Out To Society Inc: $1,100 · ReligionMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 · HealthINLAND SEAS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Environment
Other$476,523Housing & Shelter$104,040Human Services$70,260Food & Nutrition$67,020Religion$27,100Health$11,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOME REPAIR SERVICES OF KENT COUNTY INC: $77,040 over 10y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $61,020 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetRevive & Thrive Project: $40,240 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCHOSEN VISION INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetJUDSON CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $10,020 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINLAND SEAS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetODYSSEY HOUSE INC - UTAH: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $9,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIND CAMPAIGN: $9,500 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChristians Reaching Out To Society Inc: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF WONDER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOME REPAIR SERVICES OF KENT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds Revive & Thrive Project ↗
  • Who funds Branch Interfaith Hospitality Network ↗
  • Who funds CHOSEN VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDSON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds INLAND SEAS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ODYSSEY HOUSE INC - UTAH ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds KIND CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP QUALITY USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nsf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nsf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nsf Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nsf Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nsf’s filings →

More from the funding graph