Skip to content
Northeast Valley Health Corporation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Northeast Valley Health Corporation

To provide primary healthcare to medically underserved residents of los angeles county.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$562k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$27MHousing & Shelter$1.2MHuman Services$842kEmployment$226kEducation$103kCommunity Improvement$88k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.2M
$320,152
Median grant
1
States reached
$130M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JWCH INSTITUTE INC$561,509
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$541,960
USC SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY$506,363
CMOR$374,683
CHILDREN'S HOSP OF L A$320,152
EAST VALLEY$307,054
SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC$305,232
THE CHILDRENS CLINIC$251,941
UNIVERSITY CORPORATION$65,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $957k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HMLS HEALTHCARE OF LOS ANGELES: $253k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LA: $231k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LA: $231k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LA: $128k → 14%HOMELESS FED: $115k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 15 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$28M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+154%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +110%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +78%
  • JWCH INSTITUTE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +341%

Funded once

  • CH
    CITY HELP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $88k · revenue +154%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $53k · revenue -16%
  • LC
    LA CARE HEALTH PLAN
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
2
Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County

Ccalac empowers community health centers to remain at the forefront of health care transformation. we forge partnerships, foster innovation, promote health equity, and advocate for the communities they serve.

Health
3
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
6
The Center in Hollywood

The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…

Human Services
7
Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center

Fresno community hospital and medical center's (fch&mc's) exists to better the lives of all those we serve

Health
8
Salud Para La Gente

To provide high quality, comprehensive, and cost effective healthcare responsive to the needs of the communities we serve.

—
9
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
10
La Familia Medical Center

Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…

—
11
Los Angeles Christian Health Centers

The mission of los angeles christian health centers is to follow christ by loving and serving our neighbors through the provision of comprehensive quality healthcare. our vision is the healing and restoration of homeless and underserved…

Health
12
Family Health Care Centers of Greater Los Angeles

Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Los Angeles Free Clinic; the most unlike its peers is San Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $5,960,628 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $3,639,881 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $3,459,854 · HealthJWCH INSTITUTE INCCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO: $3,046,388 · HealthCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMEROTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $1,833,639 · HealthTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINICPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH: $1,325,625 · HealthPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH+1 more: $612,340 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES': $2,425,251 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SER…EAST VALLEY: $1,814,614 · OtherEAST VALLEYANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY CLINIC: $1,557,231 · OtherANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY …REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY: $1,140,024 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITYTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $291,366 · Other+3 more: $362,118 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $4,231,920 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …+1 more: $52,979 · EducationHomeless Health Care Los Angeles: $956,500 · Human ServicesCITY HELP INC: $88,000 · Community Improvement
Health$19,878,355Other$7,590,604Education$4,284,899Human Services$956,500Community Improvement$88,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $5,960,628 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $4,231,920 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $3,639,881 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $3,459,854 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO: $3,046,388 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES': $2,425,251 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $1,833,639 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY CLINIC: $1,557,231 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH: $1,325,625 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHomeless Health Care Los Angeles: $956,500 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA: $612,340 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $291,366 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCentral City Community Health Center Inc: $202,504 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSan Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc: $127,153 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $52,979 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds JWCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES' ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Health Care Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Central City Community Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds San Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Direct ReliefCalifornia Physicians…Baby2babyCalifornia Community …The Ralph M Parsons F…United Way IncWeingart FoundationCorporation for Suppo…Shelter Partnership I…The Ahmanson Foundati…California Healthcare…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Direct Relief · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Baby2baby · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · United Way Inc · Weingart Foundation · Corporation for Supportive Housing · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Northeast Valley Health Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Northeast Valley Health Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Northeast Valley Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home