Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Northeast Valley Health Corporation

To provide primary healthcare to medically underserved residents of los angeles county.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$561k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$27MHousing & Shelter$1.2MHuman Services$842kEmployment$226kEducation$103kCommunity Improvement$88k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $866k
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.5M
$251,941
Median grant
1
States reached
$104M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JWCH INSTITUTE INC$560,659
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$541,960
USC SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY$425,348
CMOR$374,683
CHILDREN'S HOSP OF L A$320,152
THE CHILDRENS CLINIC$251,941
SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC$230,232
UNIVERSITY CORPORATION$226,366
EAST VALLEY$207,054
PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER$202,708
SAN FERNANDO VALLEY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$24,941
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $957k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HMLS HEALTHCARE OF LOS ANGELES: $253k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LA: $231k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LA: $231k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LA: $128k → 14%HOMELESS FED: $115k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 14 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$25M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+154%

Still filing today

79%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +110%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +78%
  • JWCH INSTITUTE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +341%

Funded once

  • CH
    CITY HELP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $88k · revenue +154%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $53k · revenue -16%
  • LC
    LA CARE HEALTH PLAN
    one grant, 2017 · $32k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
2
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
3
The Center in Hollywood

The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…

Human Services
4
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
5
Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County

Ccalac empowers community health centers to remain at the forefront of health care transformation. we forge partnerships, foster innovation, promote health equity, and advocate for the communities they serve.

Health
6
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
7
Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center

Fresno community hospital and medical center's (fch&mc's) exists to better the lives of all those we serve

Health
8
Salud Para La Gente

To provide high quality, comprehensive, and cost effective healthcare responsive to the needs of the communities we serve.

9
La Familia Medical Center

Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…

10
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
11
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
12
Kalihi-Palama Health Center (Hale Ho'ola Hou)

To provide quality, integrated health and social services to our community and all others in need of health care.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Los Angeles Free Clinic and the most unlike its peers is San Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $5,418,668 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $3,319,729 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesJWCH INSTITUTE INC — $2,898,345 · HealthJWCH INSTITUTE INCCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO — $2,671,705 · HealthCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMEROTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC — $1,528,407 · HealthTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINICPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH — $1,325,625 · HealthPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTHCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA — $612,340 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES' — $2,173,310 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SER…ANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY CLINIC — $1,557,231 · OtherANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY …EAST VALLEY — $1,507,560 · OtherEAST VALLEYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY — $1,140,024 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY+4 more — $588,484 · Other+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $3,725,557 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …+1 more — $52,979 · EducationHomeless Health Care Los Angeles — $956,500 · Human ServicesCITY HELP INC — $88,000 · Community Improvement
Health$17,774,819Other$6,966,609Education$3,778,536Human Services$956,500Community Improvement$88,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $5,418,668 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $3,725,557 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $3,319,729 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC — $2,898,345 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO — $2,671,705 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES' — $2,173,310 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY CLINIC — $1,557,231 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC — $1,528,407 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH — $1,325,625 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHomeless Health Care Los Angeles — $956,500 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA — $612,340 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $226,366 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCentral City Community Health Center Inc — $202,504 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSan Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc — $127,153 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION — $52,979 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds JWCH INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds CLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES'
  • Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY COMMUNITY CLINIC
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH
  • Who funds Homeless Health Care Los Angeles
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds Central City Community Health Center Inc
  • Who funds San Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc
  • Who funds CITY HELP INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Direct Relief · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Baby2baby · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · United Way Inc · Weingart Foundation · Corporation for Supportive Housing · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Northeast Valley Health Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph