Skip to content
North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council at a glance

· Public charity

North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council

To facilitate the development, implementation, and operation of a comprehensive trauma care system based on accepted standards of care to decrease morbidity and mortality.

$7.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
60
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$21MHealth$1.6MPublic Benefit$358kReligion$12k
02FY2025 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 60 grants below total $7,495,991, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,937,634 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $441,643 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $140k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $394k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+10 grants · $5.5M
$22,561
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDICAL JETS INTL$1,033,821
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE$876,430
CITY OF DALLAS$771,142
GRAND PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT$519,372
PARKER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTLIFECARE EMS$473,663
ABILENE FIRE DEPARTMENT$413,225
TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND$410,219
KRUM FIRE DEPT$335,158
RICHARDSON FIRE DEPT$329,556
ROANOKE FIRE DEPT$297,716
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE$229,788
CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE$193,771
TAYLOR COUNTY EMS$190,882
MEDSTAR$159,406
MCKINNEY FIRE DEPT$145,978
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FISHER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT EMS: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 59 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

59 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
30

Total granted

$21M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+18%

Still filing today

8%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $516k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    South Taylor Emergency Medical Serv
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +29% · 44% of their budget
  • EC
    ERATH COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +48%
  • DV
    DENISON VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • TD
    TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $318k
  • HH
    HCA HEALTHCARE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $317k
  • SC
    SACRED CROSS EMS
    one grant, 2021 · $260k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scott & White Ems Inc

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Scott & White Hospital-Marble Falls

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Scott & White Hospital-Taylor

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Baylor Medical Center at Irving

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Scott & White Continuing Care Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baylor Scott & White Health; the most unlike its peers is Minyard Founders Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

South Taylor Emergency Medical Serv: $2,932,109 · OtherSouth Taylor Emergency Medical ServCITY OF COLLEYVILLE: $2,210,186 · OtherCITY OF COLLEYVILLECITY OF DALLAS: $1,973,729 · OtherCITY OF DALLASMEDICAL JETS INTL: $1,242,592 · OtherMEDICAL JETS INTLROANOKE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,152,413 · OtherKRUM FIRE DEPT: $949,372 · OtherGRAND PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT: $917,088 · OtherMinyard Founders Foundation: $791,778 · OtherRICHARDSON FIRE DEPT: $742,874 · OtherCITY OF MCKINNEY: $739,766 · Other+82 more: $8,384,083 · Other+82 moreCAREFLITE: $296,997 · HealthCook Children's Medical Center: $11,702 · Health+3 more: $18,020 · HealthMINERAL WELLS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $213,306 · Public Safety & DisasterERATH COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $62,375 · Public Safety & DisasterDENISON VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC: $22,921 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more: $6,964 · Public Safety & DisasterFISHER COUNTY HEALTH CARE DEVELOPMENT CORP: $20,181 · Human Services
Other$22,035,990Health$326,719Public Safety & Disaster$305,566Human Services$20,181

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouth Taylor Emergency Medical Serv: $2,932,109 over 5y, 44% of budgetCAREFLITE: $296,997 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetArgyle Volunteer Fire District: $69,392 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetERATH COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $62,375 over 8y, 14% of budgetDENISON VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC: $22,921 over 3y, 23% of budgetMedical City Dallas Auxiliary: $21,117 over 1y, 87% of budgetFISHER COUNTY HEALTH CARE DEVELOPMENT CORP: $20,181 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetREFRIGERATING ENGINEERS & TECHNICIANS ASSOCIATION: $17,688 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center: $11,702 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRANBURY HOOD COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC: $7,384 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSANTO VOLUNTEER FIRE AND EMS DEPT: $6,964 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLake Pointe Operating Company LLC: $5,318 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds South Taylor Emergency Medical Serv ↗
  • Who funds Minyard Founders Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CAREFLITE ↗
  • Who funds MINERAL WELLS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Council of …Methodist Hospitals o…Firehouse Subs Public…Coserv Charitable Fou…Dallas Safety Net Sup…Best Friends Animal S…Our RescueUnited Way of Metropo…American Kennel Club …Petsmart Charities IncCommunities Foundatio…The Dallas Foundation
Community Council of Greater DallasTX25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Council of Greater Dallas · Methodist Hospitals of Dallas · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc · Coserv Charitable Foundation · Dallas Safety Net Support Corporation · Best Friends Animal Society · Our Rescue · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · American Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery Corporation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home