Loading…
· Public charity
DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION
Improve access to & availability of health care services for low-income dallas co.
$216M
Granted FY2024
39
Grants
5
Communities
$81M
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
healthsouth rehabilitationliveschildren
2020
healthsouth rehabilitation
2021
childrenhealthsouth rehabilitationlives
2022
healthsouth rehabilitation
2023
liveschildren
2024
encompass rehabilitationfriscoplanorehabbaylor scottscott whitelives
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 39 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k2 grants · $298k
- $250k+37 grants · $216M
$1,620,313
Median grant
5
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
- BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE HEALTH$81,012,579
- HCA HEALTHCARE$19,104,334
- TEXAS HEALTH PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL DALLAS$16,843,805
- METHODIST HOSPITAL FOR SURGERY$11,212,036
- NORTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER LLP$9,929,497
- TEXAS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$7,686,728
- METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM$7,128,029
- BAYLOR MEDICAL CENTER AT UPTOWN$5,920,139
- BAYLOR SURGICAL HOSPITAL AT LAS COLINAS$5,749,172
- BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE MEDICAL CENTER - FRISCO$5,127,196
- TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT TEXAS HEALTH PRESBYTERIAN DALLAS$4,992,228
- BAYLOR INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION$3,913,584
- ETHICUS HOSPITAL DFW$3,618,526
- TEXAS HEALTH CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTICS & SURGERY PLANO$3,094,397
- METHODIST MCKINNEY HOSPITAL$2,917,972
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 98% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$729M · 39 repeat orgs$23M to everyone else
39 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
39
8
Total granted
$729M
$4.2M
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+30%
+53%
Still filing today
15%
25%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19M went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE HEALTH2× · 2023–2024 · $132M · revenue +26%
- BSBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE HEALTH4× · 2019–2022 · $89M · revenue +30%
- CMCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS5× · 2018–2023 · $39M · revenue +106%
Funded once
- GOGREEN OAKS HOSPITALone grant, 2018 · $1.3M
- OCOUR CHILDREN'S HOUSEone grant, 2018 · $1.2M · revenue -100%
- NRNAVARRO REGIONAL HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $961k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
Health
2
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
Health
3
Texas Health Physicians Group
A FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATION WHOSE MISSION IS TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF the people in the communities it serves, regarless of thier ability to pay.
Health
4
Baylor Health Care System
Faith based supporting organization providing services to a network of acute care hospitals and related health care entities that provide patient care, medical education, medical research and community services.
Health
5
Baylor All Saints Medical Center
Faith based acute care hospital providing exemplary patient care, medical education, medical research and community service to the residents of Tarrant County and the surrounding communities for more than 100 years.
Health
6
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas
Not-for-profit, community owned, health care facilities with spiritual values, dedicated to providing high quality health services in a christian environment.
Health
7
Christus Health Southeast Texas
Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the teachings of the catholic church.
Health
8
Christus Northeast Texas Health System
Coordinating parent of charitable healthcare system guiding activities of affiliated entities to provide quality healthcare services to the community.
Religion
9
HealthTexas Provider Network
To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health.
Health
10
Texas Medical Center
The mission of the texas medical center ("tmc") is to promote the highest quality health status for all people by assisting institutions of the texas medical center to achieve individual and collective goals of the highest possible…
Health
11
Scott & White Clinic
Faith based physician group providing exemplary patient care, medical education, medical research and community service to residents of the Central Texas region since 1904.
Health
12
Ascension Texas
To improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Och Holdings and the most unlike its peers is Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$423,619,116Health$328,226,334
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Tarrant Safety Net Support CorporationTX29× affinity11 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Tarrant Safety Net Support Corporation · Texas Essential Healthcare Partnerships · Kidneytexas Inc · North Central Texas Trauma Regional · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE HEALTH.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 463131350 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE HEALTH, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Dallas Safety Net Support Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Dallas Safety Net Support Corporation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines