Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

New Mexico Childrens Foundation

Grants and expenses for programs serving the physical, mental, educational and social needs of children and their families.

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$171kYouth Development$140kHealth$134kEducation$83kCrime & Legal$51kFood & Nutrition$25kInternational$25kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $9,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $111,497 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $102,497 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Breakthrough Santa Fe$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%The Food Depot: $25k → 12%New Vistas: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$201k · 8 repeat orgs$519k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
28

Total granted

$201k
$519k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+43%

Still filing today

63%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES
    2× · 2019–2023 · $55k · revenue +35%
  • HM
    HIGH MOUNTAIN YOUTH PROJECT OF LINCOLN COUNTY NEW MEXICO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $21k · revenue +15%
  • SF
    SANTA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • GH
    GERARD'S HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +93%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +13%
  • SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +165%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
Santa Fe Family Service

Santa Fe Family Service helps individuals & families within the Santa Fe Independent School District by counsel, guidance, and other necessary assistance to achieve normal living, or the best possible adjustment for the welfare of the…

—
3
Growing Up New Mexicoinc

The mission of growing up new mexico is to engage the whole community, bringing together people and resources to create increased opportunities for young children and the adults in their lives to achieve their dreams and aspirations.

Philanthropy
4
The Savila Collaborative

The svila collaborative dba centro savila is a treatment program devoted to the recovery and healing of individuals, families, and communities experiencing emotional and psychological distress. our vision is to create a healthy, engaged,…

Health
5
New Mexico Kids Matter Inc

New mexico kids matter inc., serves as a court appointed special advocate to advocate for the best interest of abused, neglected and high-risk children.

Crime & Legal
6
La Vida Felicidad Inc

Life quality of children and families, adults, and seniors, through advocacy and individualized services in collaboration with community partnerships.

—
7
Casa Fortaleza

Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.

Health
8
La Casa Inc

Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.

—
9
Social and Emotional Learning Alliance for Nm

Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…

Education
10
Unica

We empower and support our community by providing trauma-informed comprehensive care across the lifespan.

Human Services
11
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
12
Northwest New Mexico First Born Program

Our program provides free home visiting services to support the health and wellness of first-time parents with children under the age of 5 years old, building strong relationships with families in the communities of mckinley county and san…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Mountain Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Talpa Community Center Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NB3 Foundation — $56,500 · OtherNB3 FoundationSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES — $55,000 · OtherSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICESEsperanza Project for Battere — $25,000 · OtherEsperanza Project for BattereSanta Fe Public Schools-Adela — $25,000 · OtherSanta Fe Public Schools-AdelaEsperanza Shelter for Battere — $25,000 · OtherEsperanza Shelter for BattereBoys & Girls ClubPojoaque Pu — $25,000 · OtherBoys & Girls ClubPojoaque PuLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER — $25,000 · OtherLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTERGirls Incorporated of SF — $25,000 · OtherGirls Incorporated of SFNM CASA Association — $15,000 · OtherIMPACT PERSONAL SAFETY — $25,000 · OtherIMPACT PERSONAL SAFETY+10 more — $82,500 · Other+10 moreTHE FOOD DEPOT — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOTNEW VISTAS — $25,000 · Human ServicesNEW VISTASYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SHELTERS …Many Mothers Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesMany Mothers In…Roswell W F L Inc — $7,500 · Human ServicesRoswell W F L I…GERARD'S HOUSE — $30,000 · HealthGERARD'S HOUSENEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC — $30,000 · HealthNEW MEXICO SUIC…SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC — $30,000 · HealthSANTA FE MOUNTA…Breaking The Silence New Mexico — $6,000 · HealthBreaking The Si…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO — $25,000 · EducationSANTA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $15,000 · EducationBridges Project for Education — $6,000 · EducationYOUTHWORKS — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentHIGH MOUNTAIN YOUTH PROJECT OF LINCOLN COUNTY NEW MEXICO — $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureEARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO — $25,000 · Environment
Other$384,000Human Services$97,500Health$96,000Education$46,000Youth Development$46,000Arts & Culture$25,000Environment$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES — $55,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGERARD'S HOUSE — $30,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetNEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC — $30,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC — $30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO — $25,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetIMPACT PERSONAL SAFETY — $25,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetNEW VISTAS — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYOUTHWORKS — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN YOUTH PROJECT OF LINCOLN COUNTY NEW MEXICO — $21,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetMany Mothers Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSANTA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCanones Early Childhood Center — $12,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetWestern Health Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetRoswell W F L Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCASA Partners 4NMKIDS Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOLLEGE AND CAREER PLAZA — $7,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBreaking The Silence New Mexico — $6,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBridges Project for Education — $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Anchorum St VincentSt Vincent HospitalLos Alamos National L…Con Alma Health Found…Rotary Club of Santa …Nancy Ann Mellen Foun…Thornburg FoundationNew Mexico Community …Albuquerque Community…The Frost FoundationPnm Tnmp Foundation
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM44× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · St Vincent Hospital · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Rotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation Inc · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New Mexico Childrens Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines