Skip to content
New England Telehealth Consortium at a glance

· Public charity

New England Telehealth Consortium

Working toward better healthcare in new england through improved telecommunicatiosn

$1.4M
Granted FY2018
26
Grants FY2018
5
States reached
$256k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$1.4MHuman Services$215k
02FY2018 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k3 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $295k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $799k
  • $250k+1 grant · $256k
$22,372
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAINE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER$256,029
LRG HEALTHCARE$221,188
EASTERN MAINE HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS$112,622
OPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC$100,973
HOWARD CENTER$88,986
MAINE VETERAN'S HOMES$82,271
COVENANT HEALTH$78,797
CENTRAL MAINE HEALTHCARE$62,281
HUGGINS HOSPITAL$52,213
LAMPREY HEALTH CARE$40,668
NORTHERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER$39,292
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER$39,016
COMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS NETWORKS$22,372
COUNSELING SERVICE OF ADDISON COUNT$21,895
RUTLAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$20,693
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOWARD CENTER: $89k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $44k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$962k · 7 repeat orgs$688k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$962k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+67%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $662k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M
    MaineHealth
    2× · 2017–2018 · $322k · revenue +239%
  • HI
    HowardCenter Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $132k · revenue +52%
  • HH
    Huggins Hospital
    2× · 2017–2018 · $65k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • GF
    GENERATIONS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +18%
  • MH
    MID-STATE HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +165%
  • AV
    ANDROSCOGGIN VALLEY HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penobscot Bay Medical Center

Penobscot Bay Medical Center (PBMC) is an acute care hospital that offers inpatient and outpatient care, diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitative services, patient and community education, and a full range of specialty services through…

—
2
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
3
Houlton Regional Hospital

Houlton Regional Hospital's purpose is to provide safe, compassionate, quality, cost effective care to communities we serve. We are dedicated to improving the health status of those we support through education, treatment and…

Health
4
Penobscot Valley Hospital

To be our community's trusted healthcare partner, committed to the health and well-being of those we serve with compassion, quality, and excellence.

Health
5
LincolnHealth Group

LincolnHealth Group (LHG) was established to promote and support integrated & cost-effective health care services for the residents and visitors of Lincoln County, Maine.

—
6
Waldo County General Hospital

Waldo County General Hospital's mission is to be the BEST - Better, Empathy, Service and Teamwork. Our goal is to ensure quality, accessible and affordable health care services and to improve the health and well-being of our community.

—
7
Calais Community Hospital

Provide access to quality healthcare and promote community wellness through the delivery of primary, emergency and ancillary inpatient and outpatient healthcare. The Hospital strives to improve the overall health of the communities we…

Health
8
Lincolnhealth

LincolnHealth is dedicated to maintaining and improving the health of our communities by assuring: the very best, highest quality, and compassionate health care services from highly trained professionals; our services are cost-effective…

—
9
Brattleboro Memorial Hospital

Brattleboro Memorial Hospital will provide community-based quality health services delivered with compassion and respect.

Health
10
Monadnock Community Hospital

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

Health
11
Eastport Memorial Hospital

Inspired by our core values of dignity and respect, Eastport Memorial Nursing Home is committed to providing the highest quality of care in a safe, loving, compassionate and home-like environment.

Health
12
Southern New Hampshire Medical Center

Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is a provider of choice, delivering…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems Northern Light Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
26/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MaineHealth: $322,364 · HealthMaineHealthOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC: $100,973 · HealthOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INCMaine Veterans Home: $82,271 · HealthMaine Veterans HomeCovenant Health: $78,797 · HealthCovenant HealthHuggins Hospital: $64,751 · HealthHuggins HospitalCENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTER: $62,281 · HealthCENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTERNORTHERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER: $56,011 · HealthNORTHERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTERLamprey Health Care Inc: $47,770 · HealthCatholic Medical Center: $39,016 · Health+16 more: $192,040 · Health+16 moreLRGHealthcare: $315,495 · OtherLRGHealthcareEASTERN MAINE HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS NORTHERN LIGHT HEALTH: $112,622 · OtherEASTERN MAINE HEALTHCARE SYSTE…RUTLAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20,693 · OtherHowardCenter Inc: $132,490 · Human ServicesHowardCen…Community Health Access Network: $22,372 · Philanthropy
Health$1,046,274Other$448,810Human Services$132,490Philanthropy$22,372

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMaineHealth: $322,364 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLRGHealthcare: $315,495 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHowardCenter Inc: $132,490 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERN MAINE HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS NORTHERN LIGHT HEALTH: $112,622 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC: $100,973 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMaine Veterans Home: $82,271 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCovenant Health: $78,797 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHuggins Hospital: $64,751 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTER: $62,281 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER: $56,011 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLamprey Health Care Inc: $47,770 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Medical Center: $39,016 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmmonoosuc Community Health Services Inc: $23,146 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Health Access Network: $22,372 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOUNSELING SERVICE OF ADDISON COUNTY: $21,895 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpeare Memorial Hospital: $20,685 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $15,640 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHealth Access Network Inc: $14,702 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBrattleboro Retreat: $12,529 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKATAHDIN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER: $10,855 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNortheastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc: $10,491 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXETER HOSPITAL INC: $10,304 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPenobscot Community Health Center: $9,830 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetValley Regional Hospital Inc: $9,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENERATIONS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $8,093 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Rivers Health Care Inc: $7,006 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMID-STATE HEALTH CENTER: $6,509 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANDROSCOGGIN VALLEY HOSPITAL INC: $6,187 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL: $5,123 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Foundation for Health…Northeast Delta Denta…Maine Cancer Foundati…Direct ReliefJsi Research & Traini…Reach Out and Read IncNew Hampshire Health …Bi-State Primary Care…Mary Hitchcock Memori…Harvard Pilgrim Healt…The Vermont Community…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH21.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Foundation for Healthy Communities · Northeast Delta Dental Foundation · Maine Cancer Foundation · Direct Relief · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · New Hampshire Health Information Organization · Bi-State Primary Care Association Inc · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New England Telehealth Consortium funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New England Telehealth Consortium. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Community Health Services Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Optimus Health Care Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Generations Family Health Center: 20% of income from government
  • Little Rivers Health Care Inc: 15% of income from government
  • HowardCenter Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Brattleboro Retreat: 0% of income from government
  • Exeter Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New England Telehealth Consortium’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home