· Public charity
Maine Cancer Foundation
Maine Cancer Foundation is dedicated to reducing cancer incidence and mortality rates in Maine.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $337k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MaineHealth - Maine Medical Center | $180,500 |
| Beth C Wright Cancer Resource Center | $174,000 |
| Maine Primary Care Association | $161,340 |
| Impact Melanoma | $130,000 |
| Cancer Resource Center of Western Maine | $112,500 |
| Franklin Memorial Hospital | $93,022 |
| Dempsey Center | $93,022 |
| Sacopee Valley Health Center | $85,000 |
| AK Health & Social Services | $80,000 |
| Penobscot Community Health Center | $80,000 |
| Greater Portland Health | $80,000 |
| Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center | $80,000 |
| Joe Andruzzi Foundation | $75,000 |
| City of Portland | $70,000 |
| Healthy Community Coalition | $67,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
57 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $568k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMaineHealth6× · 2019–2024 · $871k · revenue +80%
- BCBETH C WRIGHT CANCER RESOURCE CENTER7× · 2017–2024 · $646k · revenue +71% · 60% of their budget
- PCPenobscot Community Health Center6× · 2017–2024 · $548k · revenue +40%
Funded once
University of New Englandone grant, 2017 · $302k · revenue +24%- RARinck Advertisingone grant, 2017 · $250k
- TJTHE JACKSON LABORATORYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Penobscot Bay Medical Center (PBMC) is an acute care hospital that offers inpatient and outpatient care, diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitative services, patient and community education, and a full range of specialty services through…
MaineGeneral Health is a comprehensive non-profit system with the mission of enhancing, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
VNA Home Health & Hospice d/b/a Northern Light Home Care & Hospice provides clinically excellent, compassionate home health and hospice care to individuals and families
Southern Maine Health Care exists to improve the health and health care of the communities we serve.
Lakewood d/b/a Northern Light Continuing Care Lakewood is a 105 bed long-term care facility that provides skilled, dementia and long-term nursing care.
Maine Behavioral Healthcare provides a seamless and compassionate continuum of care through a community of providers collaborating to promote recovery and the overall mental and physical well-being of those we are privileged to serve.
Community Health and Nursing Services (CHANS) provides home health andcommunity health promotion services in Brunswick, Bath, andsurrounding communities.
Ensured a high quality, accessible, affordable and appropriate integrated health care system to improve the health and well being of the community.
LincolnHealth Group (LHG) was established to promote and support integrated & cost-effective health care services for the residents and visitors of Lincoln County, Maine.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mainehealth Care At Home and the most unlike its peers is The Snell Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MaineHealth ↗
- Who funds BETH C WRIGHT CANCER RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Penobscot Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY ACADIA ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Maine Public Health Association ↗
- Who funds Dempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF WESTERN MAINE ↗
- Who funds Maine Quality Counts ↗
- Who funds IMPACT MELANOMA INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEFFERSON CARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MaineHealth Services ↗
- Who funds University of New England ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AROOSTOOK COUNTY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds DEAN SNELL CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW MAINERS PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds PENQUIS CAP INC ↗
- Who funds WALDO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds HANLEY CENTER FOR HEALTH LEADERSHIP AND EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗
- Who funds Hospitality Homes Inc ↗
- Who funds SARAH'S HOUSE OF MAINE ↗
- Who funds Eastern Maine Medical Center Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Cen ↗
- Who funds KENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MAINE PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds KATAHDIN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds WABANAKI HEALTH & WELLNESS NPC ↗
- Who funds Waldo County General Hospital ↗
- Who funds PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · John T Gorman Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · United Way Inc · Good Shepherd Food Bank · Fisher Charitable Foundation · The Harry E Davis Partnership for Children's Oral Health · Machias Savings Bank Community Development Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maine Cancer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Impact Melanoma Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.