Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc

Harvard pilgrim health care foundation supports harvard pilgrim health care, inc.'s mission to improve the quality and value of health care for the people and communities served.

$3.6M
Granted FY2021
49
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.

Health$6.7MFood & Nutrition$6.3MPhilanthropy$1.7MHuman Services$1.3MRecreation & Sports$1.0MCommunity Improvement$857kYouth Development$826kHousing & Shelter$715kOther$0
02FY2021 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 49 grants below total $2,543,147 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,577,837 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,034,690 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $822k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUFTS HEALTH PLAN FOUNDATION INC$500,000
THE BASE$226,000
THE BOWLER-BARTLETT FOUNDATION$200,000
ELDER SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY I NC$190,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON$165,000
MEDICAL CARE DEVELOPMENT INC$100,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK$77,650
GROUNDWORK LAWRENCE INC$70,000
ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUCCESS$60,350
THE COUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF GREATER BRIDGEPORT INC$60,000
COASTAL FOODSHED INC$60,000
MILL CITY GROWS INC$31,000
SEACOAST EAT LOCAL INC$30,500
ST MARY'S NUTRITION CENTER$30,000
KENEY PARK SUSTAINABILITY PROJECT INC$26,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $71k → 7%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $61k → 7%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $60k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $21k → 7%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $35k → 10%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $25k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $12k → 14%GATHER: $36k → 5%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $25k → 10%GATHER: $26k → 5%GATHER: $25k → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $14k → 8%YWCA GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $50k → 10%YWCA GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $35k → 10%YWCA GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $26k → 10%YWCA GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $25k → 10%YWCA GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $25k → 10%SOUTHERN MAINE AGENCY ON AGING: $17k → 7%LA COLABORATIVA INC: $50k → 16%HOUSING FAMILIES INC: $13k → 8%ELDER SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY I NC: $190k → 10%LA COLABORATIVA INC: $20k → 16%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $133k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $18k → 8%ELDER SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $187k → 10%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $78k → 7%ELDER SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $151k → 10%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $32k → 7%ELDER SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC: $34k → 10%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $28k → 7%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $17k → 16%GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT INC: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $13k → 16%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $13k → 11%GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT INC: $35k → 11%GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT INC: $26k → 11%GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT INC: $25k → 11%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $13k → 7%GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT INC: $25k → 11%FAMILY SERVICES OF CENTRAL MASS: $14k → 11%ACCESSPORTAMERICA: $23k → 8%ACCESSPORT AMERICA: $12k → 8%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $13k → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $12k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $12k → 16%BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $37k → 16%BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $16k → 16%BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $16k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 96% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 158 repeat orgs$7.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

158 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2021, 118 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

158
257

Total granted

$13M
$6.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+38%

Still filing today

91%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $907k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $648k · revenue +54%
  • AGESPAN INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $562k · revenue +106%
  • TB
    THE BASEBALL INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $534k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • COMMUNITY CARE COOPERATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +163%
  • M
    MaineHealthgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $510k · revenue +80%
  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
2
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
3
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
4
Massachusetts Council of Human Services Providers Inc

To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.

—
5
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
6
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
7
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
8
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
9
Community Health and Nursing Services

Community Health and Nursing Services (CHANS) provides home health andcommunity health promotion services in Brunswick, Bath, andsurrounding communities.

Health
10
Bristol Aging & Wellness Inc

Founded in 1973, bristol aging & wellness, inc. is a private non-profit corporation, designated as an aging services access point and an area agency on aging. bristol serves as the entry point for elder services in southeastern…

Human Services
11
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
12
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mystic Valley Aging Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is The John Merck Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Construc…Food Banks and PantriesYmca Youth DevelopmentUnited Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Animal Rescue and ShelterYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Addiction Recovery ServicesCancer Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportDevelopmental Disabilities …Local History MuseumsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersDomestic Violence ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Development Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr14%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr19%26%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr14%23%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%3/431
the rest of the field
11%
4,712/41,927

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

401 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 401 of the 431 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
103
Early backer (in before they grew)
388/401
Grantees still filing
316/401
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY CARE COOPERATIVE INC — $1,000,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY CARE COOPERATIVE INCMaineHealth — $510,000 · HealthMaineHealthPOINT32HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · HealthPOINT32HEALTH FOUNDATION INCDIMOCK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $306,881 · HealthDIMOCK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER…Penobscot Community Health Center — $243,000 · HealthAmoskeag Health — $243,000 · HealthCommunity Clinical Services Inc — $233,000 · HealthPortland Community Health Center — $233,000 · HealthCoos County Family Health Services Inc — $233,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $186,550 · Health+27 more — $1,338,265 · Health+27 moreCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF GREATER BRIDGEPORT INC — $340,500 · OtherCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF GREATER BRI…SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $300,000 · OtherBOWLER-BARTLETT FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC — $647,569 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INCHarbor Homes Inc — $254,184 · OtherFamilies in Transition — $206,540 · Other+80 more — $3,816,775 · Other+80 moreCOASTAL FOODSHED — $406,304 · Food & NutritionCOASTAL FOODSH…SEACOAST EAT LOCAL INC — $211,200 · Food & NutritionSEACOAST EAT L…Good Shepherd Food Bank — $194,950 · Food & NutritionGood Shepherd …MILL CITY GROWS INC — $194,800 · Food & NutritionMILL CITY GROW…BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC — $161,750 · Food & NutritionBOSTON AREA GL…GROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON INC — $160,086 · Food & NutritionGROW FOOD NORT…HARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INC — $156,425 · Food & NutritionHARTFORD FOOD …COMMUNITY HARVEST PROJECT INC — $146,738 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY HARV…Maine Farmland Trust — $100,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST — $85,000 · Food & NutritionCumberland County Food Security Council — $85,000 · Food & NutritionJust Roots Inc — $84,920 · Food & Nutrition+6 more — $354,330 · Food & Nutrition+6 moreAGESPAN INC — $562,039 · Human ServicesAGESPAN INCNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $283,050 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire…ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND — $192,100 · Human ServicesORGANIZATION …GROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT INC — $160,950 · Human ServicesGROWING PLACE…Young Women's Christian Association of Newburyport — $160,500 · Human ServicesYoung Women's…Gather — $86,100 · Human ServicesWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC — $85,156 · Human ServicesPENQUIS CAP INC — $85,000 · Human Services+21 more — $692,548 · Human Services+21 moreBoston Foundation Inc — $1,034,407 · PhilanthropyBoston Foun…Boston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office — $251,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Char…HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING — $100,000 · PhilanthropyThe New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Inc — $80,000 · PhilanthropyWolfe's Neck Farm Foundation — $75,000 · PhilanthropyUMASS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $72,900 · Philanthropy+7 more — $287,018 · Philanthropy+7 moreTHE BASEBALL INC — $534,300 · Recreation & SportsHEAD-OF-THE CHARLES REGATTA INC — $140,000 · Recreation & SportsHARTFORD MARATHON FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · Recreation & SportsWINTERKIDS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $30,250 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $37,425 · Recreation & SportsGroundwork Lawrence Inc — $190,249 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $168,725 · Community ImprovementTHE URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE OF BOSTONINC — $91,800 · Community ImprovementNEW PROFIT INC — $80,000 · Community ImprovementMaine Association of Nonprofits — $60,550 · Community ImprovementFOUNDATION FOR A STRONG MAINE ECONOMY — $50,000 · Community ImprovementInstitute for Family-Owned Business — $32,305 · Community Improvement+4 more — $76,250 · Community Improvement
Health$5,026,696Other$5,765,568Food & Nutrition$2,341,503Human Services$2,307,443Philanthropy$1,900,325Recreation & Sports$821,975Community Improvement$749,879

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoston Foundation Inc — $1,034,407 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE COOPERATIVE INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC — $647,569 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAGESPAN INC — $562,039 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BASEBALL INC — $534,300 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetMaineHealth — $510,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT32HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCOASTAL FOODSHED — $406,304 over 3y, 39% of budgetDIMOCK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $306,881 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $283,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHarbor Homes Inc — $254,184 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBoston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office — $251,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPenobscot Community Health Center — $243,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmoskeag Health — $243,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCommunity Clinical Services Inc — $233,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPortland Community Health Center — $233,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCoos County Family Health Services Inc — $233,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSEACOAST EAT LOCAL INC — $211,200 over 4y, 12% of budgetFamilies in Transition — $206,540 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBOWLER-BARTLETT FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank — $194,950 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMILL CITY GROWS INC — $194,800 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND — $192,100 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetGroundwork Lawrence Inc — $190,249 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $186,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $168,725 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $162,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC — $161,750 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetGROWING PLACES GARDEN PROJECT INC — $160,950 over 5y, 15% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Newburyport — $160,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetGROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON INC — $160,086 over 5y, 19% of budgetFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $160,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INC — $156,425 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetFIRST CHOICE HEALTH CENTERS INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST PROJECT INC — $146,738 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetREGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC — $141,400 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetSt Mary's Regional Medical Center — $140,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD-OF-THE CHARLES REGATTA INC — $140,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $131,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT FORUM INC — $121,300 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC — $115,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $111,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC — $110,739 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetNEW HAVEN FARMS INC — $104,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetTHE JOHN MERCK FUND — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMaine Farmland Trust — $100,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMedical Care Development Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Point32health Foundat…Bangor Savings Bank F…John T Gorman Foundat…Elmina B Sewall Found…Eastern Bank Foundati…Maine Community Found…Maine Health Access F…Agnes M Lindsay TrustUnited Way Of Massach…Health Resources in A…Eversource Energy Fou…Peoples United Commun…
Point32health Foundation IncMA111.5× affinity65 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Point32health Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Community Care Cooperative Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Arc Massachusetts Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Groundwork Bridgeport Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Harc Inc — 92% of income from government
  • Operation Able of Greater Boston Inc — 81% of income from government
  • Windham Regional Community Council Inc — 76% of income from government
  • Clifford Beers Community Care Center Inc — 75% of income from government
  • Northeast Arc Inc — 73% of income from government
  • Bay Cove Human Services Inc — 70% of income from government
  • Coastal Foodshed — 66% of income from government
  • Aids Project Worcester Inc — 63% of income from government
  • Riverside Industries Inc — 61% of income from government
  • Dove Inc — 60% of income from government
  • Veterans Inc — 58% of income from government
  • Agespan Inc — 57% of income from government
  • Growing Places Garden Project Inc — 49% of income from government
  • New Britain Roots Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Cardinal Cushing Centers Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Community Health & Wellness Center of Greater Torrington Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Missionsafe a New Beginning Inc — 38% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Keney Park Sustainability Project — 37% of income from government
  • La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Waterford Country School Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Grow Food Northampton Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Boston Area Gleaners Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Hands On Hartford Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Community Harvest Project Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
  • First Choice Health Centers Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Just Roots Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Green Village Initiative Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Chica Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Housing Families Inc — 12% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc) — 11% of income from government
  • Edward M Kennedy Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Metrohartford Alliance Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Southwest Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Worcester Natural History Society Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Codman Square Health Center Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Mill City Grows Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Regional Environmental Council Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
  • The Urban Farming Institute of Bostoninc — 4% of income from government
  • Old Sturbridge Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Babson College — 3% of income from government
  • Lahey Clinic Hospital Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Asian Community Development Corporation — 2% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Regis College — 2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Worcester Center for Performing Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Madison Park Development Corporation — 1% of income from government
  • Wellspring Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Marion Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
  • New England Baptist Hospital — 1% of income from government
  • The Baseball Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Health Council Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
  • Springfield Partners for Community Action Inc — 0% of income from government
  • The New England Council Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Hartford Marathon Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
15rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 431 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines