Skip to content

· Private foundation

Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$194k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$242kRecreation & Sports$235kYouth Development$201kHuman Services$106kHousing & Shelter$83kEducation$53kArts & Culture$51kPhilanthropy$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $180k
$14,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE$25,000
NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED$25,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
UMBC FOUNDATION$15,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
THE FAMILY EFFECT$14,500
MAKE-A-WISH COLORADO$10,000
CAMP WAPIYAPI$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA PORTE$10,000
A WISH WITH WINGS INC$5,000
GRAND COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE$5,000
COLORADO JUNIOR WHEELCHAIR SPORTS CAMP$2,500
BGOLDN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FLUOR CARES: $5k → 14%FLUOR CARES: $5k → 14%FLUOR CARES: $5k → 14%FLUOR CARES: $5k → 14%KIDS MOBILITY NETWORK INC: $2k → 8%SAFE HARBOR INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
IN
CO
VA
MD
NC
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$964k · 19 repeat orgs$302k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
25

Total granted

$964k
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+6%

Still filing today

47%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +102%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $138k · revenue +26%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $90k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLOgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +63%
  • UC
    UPSTATE COMMUNITY ABILITIES NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Discover Ability

Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.

Recreation & Sports
2
Team Breckenridge Sports Club Inc

It is our mission to provide this community with an athletic environment that allows each athlete to reach their potential and pursue their life's goals through through snow sports.

Recreation & Sports
3
906 Adventure Team

To inspire youth to experience outdoor adventures through mountain biking and trails, with a focus on building self-esteem and strong minds, active healthy lifestyles, and trail stewardship.

Youth Development
4
Sos Outreach

Sos outreach changes young lives, building character and leadership in underserved kids through mentoring outdoors.

Recreation & Sports
5
Boys and Girls Clubs of Metro Denver Inc

To provide club members with a safe, supportive, fun, and enriching environment that inspires and empowers them to achieve their greatest potential. bgcmd accomplishes this mission with a foundational social- emotional learning approach…

—
6
Girls On the Run of the Rockies

Girls on the run inspires girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running. we envision a world where every girl knows and activates her limitless potential and is free…

Youth Development
7
Meals On Wheels of Boulder Inc

The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.

Food & Nutrition
8
Unlikely Riders Inc

At unlikely riders, we create joyful and inclusive spaces in mountain sports by breaking down barriers and fostering a supportive community to empower individuals to lead and thrive in skiing, snowboarding, backcountry exploration, and…

Recreation & Sports
9
Team Summit

Team summit is a youth development organization empowering our athletes to realize and celebrate their personal podiums through athletics, education and life skills by participating in innovative programming at our world class venues.

Recreation & Sports
10
Colorado Stars

None

—
11
Rocky Mountain Children's Law Center

To advocate for children and youth, drive systemic reeform, and boldly challenge the status quo so every young person who has experienced trauma or instability has the opportunity to thrive.

Crime & Legal
12
Child and Family Advocacy Program

Blue sky bridge is a child advocacy center dedicated to creating lasting positive change in the lives of children affected by abuse in boulder county and beyond. its vision is to be a beacon of strength, leadership, hope and resilience…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Colorado; the most unlike its peers is The Family Effect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MTY-PARTNERS WITH YOUTH: $90,000 · OtherMTY-PARTNERS WITH YOUTHIndividual grant recipient: $89,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE: $75,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLEUMBC FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherUMBC FOUNDATIONCAASH CHARITY CO: $45,000 · OtherCAASH CHARITY COIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA PORTE: $35,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $35,000 · OtherYMCA OF ANDERSON SOUTH: $30,000 · OtherCAMP WAPIYAPI: $30,000 · OtherPRISMA HEALTH FAMILY YMCA: $27,500 · Other+22 more: $133,000 · Other+22 moreChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $137,500 · HealthChildren's Hospita…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $55,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDA…BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC: $185,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL SPORTS C…+1 more: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $49,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentFLUOR CARES: $20,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $6,700 · Human ServicesKIDS MOBILITY NETWORK INC: $1,700 · Human ServicesTHE MORRISON THEATER COMPANY: $19,650 · Arts & CultureSOUTH SHORE ARTS INC: $16,000 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN HONOR FLIGHT: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHUNGER ENDS HERE: $14,000 · Food & NutritionGOLDEN BACKPACK PROGRAM INC: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$680,000Health$207,500Recreation & Sports$190,000Youth Development$84,500Human Services$48,400Arts & Culture$40,650Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC: $185,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $137,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $55,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $49,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetFLUOR CARES: $20,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE MORRISON THEATER COMPANY: $19,650 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH SHORE ARTS INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE FAMILY EFFECT: $14,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHUNGER ENDS HERE: $14,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFORKIDS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $6,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCREATING YOUNG MINDS: $6,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetCHALLENGE TO CONQUER CANCER: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetA WISH WITH WINGS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN HONOR FLIGHT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIDE IN PLAIN SIGHT: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKIDS MOBILITY NETWORK INC: $1,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOLDEN BACKPACK PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBASECAMP EXPLORER FOUNDATION USA: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FLUOR CARES ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO ↗
  • Who funds THE MORRISON THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SHORE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY EFFECT ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER ENDS HERE ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATING YOUNG MINDS ↗
  • Who funds 5430 Kids Tennis Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE TO CONQUER CANCER ↗
  • Who funds A WISH WITH WINGS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO21.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As?

    Find your warmest path to Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As’ filings →

    More from the funding graph