· Private foundation
Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $180k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED | $25,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| UMBC FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| THE FAMILY EFFECT | $14,500 |
| CAMP WAPIYAPI | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA PORTE | $10,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH COLORADO | $10,000 |
| GRAND COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE | $5,000 |
| A WISH WITH WINGS INC | $5,000 |
| COLORADO JUNIOR WHEELCHAIR SPORTS CAMP | $2,500 |
| MOUNTAIN FAMILY CENTER | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NSNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC6× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +102%
- CHChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation6× · 2020–2025 · $138k · revenue +26%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $90k
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLOgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +63%
- UCUPSTATE COMMUNITY ABILITIES NETWORKone grant, 2022 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.
It is our mission to provide this community with an athletic environment that allows each athlete to reach their potential and pursue their life's goals through through snow sports.
To inspire youth to experience outdoor adventures through mountain biking and trails, with a focus on building self-esteem and strong minds, active healthy lifestyles, and trail stewardship.
Sos outreach changes young lives, building character and leadership in underserved kids through mentoring outdoors.
To provide club members with a safe, supportive, fun, and enriching environment that inspires and empowers them to achieve their greatest potential. bgcmd accomplishes this mission with a foundational social- emotional learning approach…
Girls on the run inspires girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running. we envision a world where every girl knows and activates her limitless potential and is free…
The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.
At unlikely riders, we create joyful and inclusive spaces in mountain sports by breaking down barriers and fostering a supportive community to empower individuals to lead and thrive in skiing, snowboarding, backcountry exploration, and…
Team summit is a youth development organization empowering our athletes to realize and celebrate their personal podiums through athletics, education and life skills by participating in innovative programming at our world class venues.
None
To advocate for children and youth, drive systemic reeform, and boldly challenge the status quo so every young person who has experienced trauma or instability has the opportunity to thrive.
Blue sky bridge is a child advocacy center dedicated to creating lasting positive change in the lives of children affected by abuse in boulder county and beyond. its vision is to be a beacon of strength, leadership, hope and resilience…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Colorado and the most unlike its peers is The Family Effect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FLUOR CARES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO ↗
- Who funds THE MORRISON THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SHORE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY EFFECT ↗
- Who funds UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds GREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CREATING YOUNG MINDS ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN HONOR FLIGHT ↗
- Who funds 5430 Kids Tennis Foundation ↗
- Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗
- Who funds GRAND COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As?
Find your warmest path to Neale Family Foundation Northern Trust Na As through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.