How much did NAVIGAGE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of NAVIGAGE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

classes

2019

—

2020

educationmeal

2021

elderly outreacheducationmeal

2022

deliveryeducationmeal

2023

villageeducation

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $10k
$10k–50k5 grants · $115k
$50k–250k5 grants · $693k

$45,000

Median grant

States reached

$18M

Total assets

Largest grants

STELLA CARVER FOUNDATION$200,000
VIVALON$150,000
THE BUCK INSTITUTE$125,000
AGING NEXT$125,000
USC VERDUGO HILLS HOPSITAL FOUNDATION$92,836
ASHBY VILLAGE$45,000
PASADENA VILLAGE FOR COMMUNITY SENIORS$30,000
CENTRAL NEGIHBORHOOD HEALTH FOUNDATION$15,000
BREAD & ROSES$15,000
ON LOK DAY SERVICES$10,000
JFS CARE$5,000
YMCA OF THE FOOTHILLS$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.2M · 14 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.2M

$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%

+36%

Still filing today

29%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $355k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthReligionSocial ScienceEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

V
VIVALON
4× · 2021–2024 · $553k · revenue +41%
PS
PASADENA SENIOR CENTER
4× · 2020–2023 · $405k · revenue +60%
CF
COVIA FOUNDATION
3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +48%

Funded once

TS
THE STELLA CARVER
one grant, 2018 · $500k
BI
BUCK INSTITUTEgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $155k · revenue +76%
MV
MONTE VISTA GROVE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY
one grant, 2022 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

La Loma Senior Living

La loma offers a relaxed and worry-free lifestyle for its residents. the health and rehabilitation center provides skilled nursing and assisted living care to its residents.

Human Services

San Francisco Village

San Francisco Village is an innovative membership organization that enables residents to age in their own homes. The Village is dedicated to building community connections for San Francisco residents aged 60 and older, assisted by a robust…

Human Services

Villages of San Mateo County

We enable seniors to live in their own homes independently, connect with their community, and age with dignity and grace.

Public Benefit

Viamonte Senior Living 1 Inc

Viamonte senior living 1, inc. ("vsl") provides organization structure and leadership to meet the needs and improve the quality of life of older persons by offering housing and programs.

—

Los Angeles Jewish Home for the Aging

Nursing, residential and clinical care for the elderly.

Community Improvement

Senior Citizens Housing Development

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter

La Vida Llena

Provide quality housing, care and services to the seniors of the life care retirement community.

—

The Home for the Aged

—

Covia Affordable Communities

Provide senior communities with quality housing, assisted living, social & health care services.

—

Mecosta County Council On Aging

The council/retired and senior volunteer program is a non-profit, non- political organization that coordinates programs, public and private, to promote and safeguard the indpendence and well-being of senior citizens in the state of…

—

Sunset Retirement Communities Inc

Continuing care retirement community that provides housing and services for older adults.

Human Services

Sun Health Colonnade

Sun health's colonnade community has 40 acres of mediterranean amenities and ambiance that provides residents and the community with health, wellness and empowered living.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monte Vista Grove Homes and the most unlike its peers is Solheim Lutheran Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/18

Grantees still filing

14/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,951,522Human Services$1,119,660Social Science$155,000Health$150,000Education$100,000Philanthropy$25,000Religion$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NAVIGAGE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ASHBY VILLAGE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +59% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 272174330 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ASHBY VILLAGE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Navigage Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Navigage Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NAVIGAGE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Navigage Foundation?

More from the funding graph

NAVIGAGE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Navigage Foundation?

More from the funding graph