· Public charity
National Education Association of the United States
Our mission is to advocate for education professionals and to unite our members and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 203 grants below total $135,287,938 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $153,774,870 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,486,932 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k68 grants · $1.7M
- $50k–250k65 grants · $7.4M
- $250k+60 grants · $126M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION | $13,560,103 |
| OHIO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $6,183,743 |
| MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $5,896,598 |
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE EDUCATION ASSN | $5,878,935 |
| ILLINOIS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION-NEA | $5,257,586 |
| NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $5,055,075 |
| MASSACHUSETTS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION | $4,940,457 |
| FLORIDA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $3,943,493 |
| MARYLAND STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $3,602,780 |
| WASHINGTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $3,505,657 |
| COLORADO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $3,286,998 |
| VIRGINIA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $2,949,142 |
| ALABAMA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $2,936,899 |
| TEXAS STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION | $2,559,594 |
| OREGON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $2,245,416 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
292 repeat relationships — 161 still active in FY2024, 131 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $98M · revenue +20%
- NJNEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $45M · revenue +16%
- PSPENNSYLVANIA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $43M · revenue +21%
Funded once
- IEILLINOIS EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $4.5M
- TGThe Good Land Committee Incone grant, 2020 · $3.5M
- GWGREATER WISCONSIN COMMITTEE INCone grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue -97%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to advocate for education professionals and to unite our members and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.
To advocate for education professionals and to unite our members and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.
To represent its members in their relations with their employer in all matters relating to employment conditions,including but not limited to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.
To promote and assist teachers and administrators in pursuing excellence in primary and secondary education.
The objective of this organization is to promote the best interest in education to improve the promotional status of its members and to cooperate with the state and national associations for the purpose of mutual professional advancement.
Teacher labor organization that assists public school teachers in Stamford CT with contract administration and negotiations.
Advocate for quality public school and public school employees where members work collaboratively and organize for action to reach the common goals of the association.
To support public education and promote the professional interest of public school educators, and protect interest in retirement benefits.
Unite all school administrators in the promotion of continuous improvement of education.
The local's primary function includes representing members in matters related to employee-employer relations, including, but not limited to wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment and to protect and preserve the union as…
Represent labor union members through advocacy and training.
Labor union
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Education Association and the most unlike its peers is Raikes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
444 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 444 of the 558 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OHIO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds COLORADO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STATE UNITED TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds THE NEA FOUNDATION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds INDIANA STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds STATE ENGAGEMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ASSOC OF EDUCATORS INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MONTANA FEDERATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ↗
- Who funds IDAHO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEA - NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds NEVADA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Georgia Association of Educators Inc ↗
- Who funds WYOMING EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION OF EDUCATORS ↗
- Who funds VERMONT - NEA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · America Votes · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Tides Advocacy · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · State Engagement Fund · Instructional Telecommunications Foundation Inc · Democracy Fund Voice Inc · Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · Strategic Victory Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Education Association of the United States funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Vermont - Nea — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.