Skip to content
National Charity League Inc Peninsula Chapter at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Charity League Inc Peninsula Chapter

The organization provides service and monetary donations to local charitable organizations and college scholarships to individuals.

$197k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$90kYouth Development$46kHousing & Shelter$40kCommunity Improvement$36kHuman Services$32k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $30,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $197,100 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $166,600 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$426k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STS PETER & PAUL POVERTY PRGM$6,500
HARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES$6,000
MANES FOR MOVEMENT$6,000
COMMUNITY HELPLINE$6,000
BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 14%RAINBOW SERVICES: $8k → 14%HOUSE OF YAHWEH: $11k → 14%HOUSE OF YAHWEH: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$217k · 9 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$217k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+9%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO
    5× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +543%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR
    3× · 2018–2024 · $24k · revenue +109%
  • CC
    COMMUNITYS CHILD INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $22k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • RAINBOW SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -17%
  • PT
    PEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +20%
  • 1F
    1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Human Services Network Dba Youth Services Network Inc

Our missions is to restore youth to lives of purpose, meaning and opportunity. human services network, dba youth services network (ysn), was founded in 1985. ysn operates three (3) community-based homes that serve boys from throughout los…

Health
2
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
3
Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor

The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…

—
4
Colette's Children's Home Inc

Colettes childrens home provides housing and supportive services to homeless women and children with nowhere to turn. we work to remove the barriers that cause displacement and provide the means for transition from homelessness to stable…

Housing & Shelter
5
Bayfront Youth and Family Services Inc

Bayfront Youth & Family Services is a quality provider of behavioral and mental health treatment services for children, adolescents, and their caregivers. Our mission is to provide a comprehensive support system that promotes safe and…

Health
6
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
7
Central City Hospitality House

Hospitality House is a progressive, community-based organization located in San Francisco's Tenderloin, Sixth Street Corridor, and Mid-Market neighborhoods, founded nearly 60 years ago in 1967 by community volunteers during the City's…

—
8
Vip Community Mental Health Center Inc

Intervening to protect and treat all victims of violence

Health
9
Bridges Community Treatment Services Inc

Bridges is a mental health and social services agency dedicated to supporting individuals facing behavioral health challenges and disorders. our mission is to restore dignity, respect, and to empower at risk children, youth, adults, and…

Human Services
10
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
11
Beach House Inc

Beach house, inc. dba leading families home is a multi-faceted human services non-profit agency. the programming includes emergency family shelter, supportive housing, behavioral health, education, and employment.

Human Services
12
The Ywca Monterey County

The ywca monterey county is committed to eliminating racism. with thedevelopment of the monterey county human trafficking task force, theorganization has created a collaborative effort among law enforcement,prosecutors, substance use…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainbow Services; the most unlike its peers is Manes for Movement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO: $33,500 · HealthTHE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDROCOMMUNITY HELPLINE INC: $31,250 · HealthCOMMUNITY HELPLINE INCCOMMUNITYS CHILD INC: $22,250 · HealthCOMMUNITYS CHILD INCManes for Movement Inc: $12,500 · HealthManes for Movement IncST PETERS & PAULS CHURCH: $35,500 · OtherST PETERS & PAULS CHURCHSouth Bay Youth Clubs Inc: $22,000 · OtherSouth Bay Youth Clubs IncPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $7,000 · OtherPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORKTRINITY CARE HOSPICE: $5,500 · OtherTRINITY CARE HOSPICEHOUSE OF YAHWEH: $18,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF YAHWE…RAINBOW SERVICES: $7,500 · Human ServicesRAINBOW SERVIC…1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $6,749 · Human Services1736 FAMILY CR…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR: $24,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRL…HARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $18,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$99,500Other$70,000Human Services$32,249Youth Development$24,000Housing & Shelter$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO: $33,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELPLINE INC: $31,250 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR: $24,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITYS CHILD INC: $22,250 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHOUSE OF YAHWEH: $18,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetManes for Movement Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetRAINBOW SERVICES: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Vistas for Children I…The Crail-Johnson Fou…Shelter Partnership I…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Whitney Young Childre…The Ahmanson Foundati…The Kenneth T and Eil…United Way IncBaby2babyThe Ralph M Parsons F…Network for Good
California Community FoundationCA17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Vistas for Children Inc · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Whitney Young Childrens Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Kenneth T and Eileen L Norris Foundation · United Way Inc · Baby2baby · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Charity League Inc Peninsula Chapter funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Charity League Inc Peninsula Chapter. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Charity League Inc Peninsula Chapter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home