· Private foundation
Michael & Leanne Haddad Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of MICHAEL & LEANNE HADDAD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k28 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $237k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GENYOUTH | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY | $47,500 |
| ST NORBERT COLLEGE | $26,000 |
| ON BROADWAY | $25,000 |
| BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY | $20,000 |
| HSHS ST VINCENT ST MARY FDN | $16,905 |
| DE PERE GREENWOOD CEMETARY | $12,500 |
| DE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| CHILDREN'S WI FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| CAPE ELIZABETH MUSIC BOOSTERS | $11,599 |
| CASA OF BROWN COUNTY | $11,084 |
| NOTRE DAME ACADEMY | $11,000 |
| BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,333 |
| GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $249k · revenue +3%- GIGenYOUTH Incorporated2× · 2022–2025 · $110k · revenue +14%
- TBTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +673%
Funded once
- SFSCHREIBER FOODS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +23%
- MUMARIAN UNIVERSITY INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +1%
- GFGOOD FOR THE SOUL THERAPEUTICone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.
Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.
To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
To lead wisconsin in development and retention of science and tech-based businesses and to provide policy guidance to lawmakers, the governor of wisconsin, state agencies, and other institutions.
To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.
Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.
We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AUTOMOBILE GALLERY INC ↗
- Who funds SCHREIBER FOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GenYOUTH Incorporated ↗
- Who funds THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds ON BROADWAY INC ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds Foster the Village Inc ↗
- Who funds MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC ↗
- Who funds Hospital Sisters of St Francis Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ENVISION GREATER GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds DE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN VETERAN'S VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEYER THEATRE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George Kress Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Chernick Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Michael & Leanne Haddad Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.