Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
75
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.

Human Services$690kFood & Nutrition$520kHousing & Shelter$369kHealth$294kYouth Development$263kArts & Culture$165kEducation$131kReligion$121kOther$0
02FY2025 · 75 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $144k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $666k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $251k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OZARKS FOOD HARVEST$51,263
CACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$50,000
FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WI$50,000
SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE OUTREACH$50,000
FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHICAN FOOD$50,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREEN BAY INC$40,000
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST MO$30,000
WELLO INC$30,000
VETERANS 1ST OF NEW$25,000
THE BUILDING FOR KIDS$25,000
ASPIRO INC$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON$25,000
CARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRIES$25,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY$25,000
BARNABAS FOUNDATION INC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $282k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%SOUTH END COMMUNITY OUTREACH MINIST: $25k → 11%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS IN: $20k → 12%ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE: $8k → 10%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS IN: $20k → 12%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS IN: $20k → 12%CROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN A: $10k → 18%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 6%GABRIELS ANGELS: $5k → 11%CROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN A: $10k → 18%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 6%GABRIELS ANGELS: $5k → 11%JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS: $20k → 10%JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS: $20k → 10%LAUNDRY LOVE WITH HELPING HANDS: $5k → 10%LAUNDRY LOVE WITH HELPING HANDS: $5k → 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $15k → 10%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $10k → 10%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $10k → 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $10k → 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $7k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $10k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $10k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $10k → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
UT
MO
MD
AZ
AR
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 53 repeat orgs$998k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
44

Total granted

$1.8M
$541k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

81%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $457k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $120k · revenue +1%
  • OF
    OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $102k · revenue +12%
  • FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $90k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • GI
    GenYOUTH Incorporated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -4%
  • MI
    MISSOURI INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCE
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -35%
  • CC
    CARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRY
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope Green Bay Inc

House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…

—
2
Family Promise of the Chippewa Valley Inc

Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.

Human Services
3
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
4
Bay View Community Center of Milwaukee Inc

We bring people together to build community as an inclusive, independent, community-supported nonprofit organization.

Human Services
5
Family Promise of Waukesha County Inc

Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter
6
Oshkosh Area Community Pantry Inc

The oshkosh area community pantry strives to eliminate food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
7
Sunshine Place Inc

To provide comprehensive services that support essential needs through community engagement and partnerships.

Human Services
8
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
9
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
10
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
11
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Cornerhouse

The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Refuge Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cache Valley Humanitarian Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesLocal History MuseumsCommunity Arts CentersImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Domestic Violence ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…United Way AffiliatesYouth Development ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …Ymca Youth DevelopmentDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Development CentersCancer Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringFaith-Based Social ServicesCommunity FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%8%<5yr12%10%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr16%23%35–55yr19%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%5%<5yr12%8%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr16%26%35–55yr19%13%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/98
the rest of the field
8%
3,022/36,428

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/95
Grantees still filing
45/95
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CASA ALBA MELANIE HISPANIC COMMUNIT — $115,000 · OtherCASA ALBA MELANIE HISPANIC COMMUNITHOUSE OF HOPE — $60,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHICAN FOOD — $50,000 · OtherGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $50,000 · OtherGenYOUTH Incorporated — $50,000 · OtherCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $50,000 · OtherBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · Other+67 more — $979,402 · Other+67 moreLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc — $60,000 · Human ServicesLittle Lambs…JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY TO A…COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY INC — $32,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SE…GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesGREATER GREE…SOUTH END COMMUNITY OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $25,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH END CO…CROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN AREA — $20,000 · Human ServicesCROSSLINES C…OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGINC — $20,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS FOR …CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCASA GUADALU…GOLDEN HOUSE INC — $15,000 · Human Services+6 more — $55,000 · Human Services+6 moreOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC — $102,468 · Food & NutritionOZARKS FOOD …FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $90,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMER…SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH — $50,000 · Food & NutritionSHIPPENSBURG…SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI — $35,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVE…HOPE GARDENS — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $18,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 moreTHE BUILDING FOR KIDS INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BUILD…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INC — $55,340 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'…MISSOURI INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCE — $30,000 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI …AFRICAN HERITAGE INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN H…MONETT AREA FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC N00069824 — $25,000 · Arts & CultureMONETT AR…NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC — $12,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL …BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC — $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'…REINS OF RHYTHM RIDING & HORSEMANSHIP INCR — $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentREINS OF …THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHAMBERSBURG AND SHIPPENSBURG INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS …+4 more — $20,500 · Youth Development+4 moreNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterVETERANS 1ST OF NEW INC — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $17,500 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF REFUGE INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC — $10,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterWELLO INC — $55,000 · HealthBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC — $15,000 · HealthCEREBRAL PALSY INC — $13,000 · HealthEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY — $10,000 · HealthNAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $5,000 · HealthBROWN COUNTY ORAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $2,500 · Health
Other$1,429,402Human Services$317,000Food & Nutrition$310,468Arts & Culture$227,840Youth Development$226,500Housing & Shelter$172,500Health$105,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC — $120,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC — $102,468 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BUILDING FOR KIDS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc — $60,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INC — $55,340 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetWELLO INC — $55,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGenYOUTH Incorporated — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO — $45,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC — $42,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $39,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY INC — $32,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetMISSOURI INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCE — $30,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN HERITAGE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST — $30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJoplin Transitional Housing Inc — $29,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRY — $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetACHIEVE BROWN COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCACHE VALLEY HUMANITARIAN CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 65% of budgetSOUTH END COMMUNITY OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMONETT AREA FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC N00069824 — $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDHOOD SAFETY INC — $24,632 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $22,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetREINS OF RHYTHM RIDING & HORSEMANSHIP INCR — $21,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetFOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN AREA — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGINC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHAMBERSBURG AND SHIPPENSBURG INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOLDEN HOUSE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE GARDENS — $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSERVICE LEAGUE OF GREEN BAY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetGREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGEREADY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Green Bay Com…Green Bay Packers Fou…John and Engrid Meng …George Kress Foundati…US Ventureschmidt Fam…Schneider National Fo…K C Stock Foundation …Wisconsin Public Serv…Cornerstone Foundatio…Byron L Walter Family…De Pere Christian Out…Little Rapids Corpora…
Greater Green Bay Community Foundation IncWI85.6× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · John and Engrid Meng Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Schneider National Foundation Inc · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002 · De Pere Christian Outreach · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 128 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines