Skip to content
Michael & Leanne Haddad Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Michael & Leanne Haddad Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$407k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$677kFood & Nutrition$367kArts & Culture$327kPhilanthropy$228kHealth$195kHuman Services$192kCommunity Improvement$64kReligion$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENYOUTH$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY$47,500
ST NORBERT COLLEGE$26,000
ON BROADWAY$25,000
BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY$20,000
HSHS ST VINCENT ST MARY FDN$16,905
CHILDREN'S WI FOUNDATION$12,500
DE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION$12,500
DE PERE GREENWOOD CEMETARY$12,500
CAPE ELIZABETH MUSIC BOOSTERS$11,599
CASA OF BROWN COUNTY$11,084
NOTRE DAME ACADEMY$11,000
BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,333
GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOOAH INC: $500 → 8%JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS: $5k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $1k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $1k → 10%JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS: $8k → 10%JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS: $8k → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $13k → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $13k → 10%FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
NY
IA
IN
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
NM
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 49 repeat orgs$452k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
45

Total granted

$1.7M
$378k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+21%

Still filing today

53%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $249k · revenue +3%
  • GI
    GenYOUTH Incorporated
    2× · 2022–2025 · $110k · revenue +14%
  • TB
    THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +673%

Funded once

  • SF
    SCHREIBER FOODS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +23%
  • MU
    MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • WV
    WISCONSIN VETERAN'S VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
3
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
4
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
5
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
6
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
7
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

—
8
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
9
Wisconsin Technology Council Inc

To lead wisconsin in development and retention of science and tech-based businesses and to provide policy guidance to lawmakers, the governor of wisconsin, state agencies, and other institutions.

Community Improvement
10
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
11
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

—
12
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/55
Grantees still filing
35/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHREIBER FOODS FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · OtherSCHREIBER FOODS FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY: $201,178 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAYTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $84,176 · OtherTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $70,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION: $66,666 · OtherENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATIONHSHS ST VINCENTST MARYS FOUNDATION: $53,262 · Other+71 more: $472,088 · Other+71 moreST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $248,752 · EducationST NORBERT COLLE…Oklahoma State University Foundation: $50,000 · EducationOklahoma State U…MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $25,000 · EducationMARIAN UNIVERSIT…+3 more: $5,763 · EducationGREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $158,080 · PhilanthropyGREATER GREEN B…GenYOUTH Incorporated: $110,000 · PhilanthropyGenYOUTH Incorp…BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY: $50,000 · PhilanthropyBROWN COUNTY UN…+2 more: $2,420 · PhilanthropyAUTOMOBILE GALLERY INC: $283,000 · Arts & CultureAUTOMOBILE GALL…DE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $14,018 · Arts & CultureON BROADWAY INC: $37,500 · Community ImprovementENVISION GREATER GREEN BAY INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER GREEN BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCEREBRAL PALSY INC: $33,848 · HealthHospital Sisters of St Francis Foundation Inc: $16,905 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,010 · HealthThe Eating Disorder Foundation: $2,260 · Health+4 more: $2,714 · HealthFoster the Village Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC: $2,800 · Human ServicesUNITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $2,037 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human Services
Other$1,197,370Education$329,515Philanthropy$320,500Arts & Culture$309,518Community Improvement$62,500Health$58,737Human Services$50,337

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUTOMOBILE GALLERY INC: $283,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $248,752 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $158,080 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGenYOUTH Incorporated: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $84,176 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetBROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY: $50,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY INC: $33,848 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $25,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFoster the Village Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetHospital Sisters of St Francis Foundation Inc: $16,905 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC: $15,099 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetENVISION GREATER GREEN BAY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetDE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEYER THEATRE CORPORATION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWISCONSIN VETERAN'S VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,075 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMentors International: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHERITAGE HILL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRISE UP ATHLETICS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC: $3,603 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,010 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eating Disorder Foundation: $2,260 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $2,037 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY-BY-PLAY THEATRE INC: $1,518 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetJazz Corner Society Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN GREEN BAY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBELLIN COLLEGE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAIRY CARES OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,170 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERVIEW GARDENS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDHOOD SAFETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOOAH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $268 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $264 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $261 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUTOMOBILE GALLERY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHREIBER FOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GenYOUTH Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ON BROADWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Foster the Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospital Sisters of St Francis Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVISION GREATER GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds DE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEYER THEATRE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN VETERAN'S VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Kress Foundati…Greater Green Bay Com…John and Engrid Meng …Green Bay Packers Fou…Schreiber Foods Found…Wisconsin Public Serv…K C Stock Foundation …Schneider National Fo…Cornerstone Foundatio…Chernick Family Found…Community Foundation …US Ventureschmidt Fam…
George Kress Foundation IncWI59.3× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Kress Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Chernick Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael & Leanne Haddad Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael & Leanne Haddad Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael & Leanne Haddad Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home