· Public charity
Womens Impact Fund
Strengthen communities by maximizing womens leadership in philanthropy through collective giving, education and engagement.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $318,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $383,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $64,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $184k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Despierta | $61,350 |
| Carolina Raptor Center | $61,350 |
| Arts Plus | $61,350 |
| TreesCharlotte | $32,000 |
| Wayfinders | $31,350 |
| The Relatives | $31,350 |
| NC Wildlife Federation | $8,000 |
| Shelter Health | $8,000 |
| Right Moves for Youth | $8,000 |
| Hope Haven Inc | $8,000 |
| Independent Picture House | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $671k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC4× · 2019–2024 · $155k · revenue +84%- CRCATAWBA RIVERKEEPER FOUNDATION INC3× · 2017–2023 · $147k · revenue +267%
- OIourBRIDGE Inc3× · 2017–2020 · $125k · revenue +747%
Funded once
- MFMATTHEWS FREE MEDICAL CLINICgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $80k · revenue +55%
- TLThe Learning Collaborativeone grant, 2024 · $78k · revenue 0%
- FCFLORENCE CRITTENTON INCone grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue -51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of The Charlotte Center is to help our community flourish. We accomplish our mission by bringing people together to explore community life together through the lens of the humanities and civic imagination.
Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.
CLT Joules is a 501(c)(3) non-profit working with utilities, industry, municipalities, universities and R&D institutions to identify, advise, connect and deploy cleantech startups with Charlotte and the Research Triangle Park.
CTS Community Development is a behavioral health provider committed to helping individuals from underserved communities to live safe, productive, and meaningful lives
To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.
To produce volunteer-based theatrical events in the Charlotte, NC region.
A womens advancement center, the mission of Dress for Success is to empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and development tools to thrive in work and in life. Programs and…
Igniting collective power. Transforming systems of oppression. Healing in community.
Operation of a public charter school.
The specific objectives and purposes of this corporation shall be to assist individuals and communities, particularly those in low-income and socially disadvantaged areas, in the creation, expansion, and improvement of rural and…
Charlotte pride creates programs and activites to enrich, empower, strengthen and make visable the unique lives and experiences of lgbtq people in charlotte.
Charlotte works serves job-seekers and businesses by providing resources to develop a skilled workforce that meets employer needs. the organization offers job-search workshops, individual coaching, networking opportunities, and training…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is About Face. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 9. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 32% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 22% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
- Who funds WINGS FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds CATAWBA RIVERKEEPER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ourBRIDGE Inc ↗
- Who funds Hope Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds MeckEd ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
- Who funds Sustain Charlotte Inc ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA YOUTH COALITION ↗
- Who funds Common Wealth Associates Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BULB GALLERY ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION TRUST FOR NORTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds MATTHEWS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Heart Math Tutoring Inc ↗
- Who funds The Learning Collaborative ↗
- Who funds TreesCharlotte ↗
- Who funds Charlotte Art League Inc ↗
- Who funds GASTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON INC ↗
- Who funds The ROC Charlotte Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC ↗
- Who funds Charlotte Speech and Hearing Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA FARM TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds The Center for Community Transitions ↗
- Who funds CLAYWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds The Arts Empowerment Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Despierta ↗
- Who funds Carolina Raptor Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ArtsPlus ↗
- Who funds Supportive Housing Communities Inc ↗
- Who funds SHELTER HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Right Moves for Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds Carolinas CARE Partnership ↗
- Who funds Charlotte Bilingual Learning Center ↗
- Who funds Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds Safe Alliance Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Merancas Foundation Inc · Arts & Science Council Charlotte/Mecklenburg Inc · Ally Charitable Foundation · Charlotte Woman's Club First Citizens Bank · Truist Foundation Inc · The Presbyterian Hospital · Albemarle Foundation · The LendingTree Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Womens Impact Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.