Skip to content

· Private foundation

McPike Zima Charitable Foundation US

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$265k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.1MScience & Tech$3.0MEnvironment$2.7MInternational$587kHuman Services$576kEducation$370kArts & Culture$135kAnimals$124kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $131k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $265k
$55,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$56M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 98% of reported assets are held in Vidaquant Llc.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCE$265,000
T1 INTERNATIONAL$192,096
OUTLAW OCEAN PROJECT$175,000
FRIENDS OF AFRICA AMINI FOUNDATION$100,000
THE PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA DEBRIS PR$80,000
MOVING WINDMILL PROJECT$75,000
ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIG AGENCY$75,000
AMAZON FRONTLINES$65,000
MOORE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC POL$62,000
BIMINI BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION FOUNDATION$60,000
THE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT$55,000
FRIENDS OF THE ENVIRONMENT$50,000
OCEANS FORWARD$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
OCEAN RESCUE ALLIANCE$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 8%SENS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $300k → 8%THE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT: $55k → 10%AMAZON FRONTLINES: $65k → 10%ALGALITA MARINE RESEARCH: $65k → 14%THE PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA DEBRIS PR: $165k → 9%FRIENDS OF AFRICA AMINI FOUNDATION: $127k → 9%ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIG AGENCY: $75k → 14%GREEN TURTLE CAY: $150k → 10%BIMINI BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION FOUNDATION: $60k → 13%T1 INTERNATIONAL: $192k → 16%3 AXIS ADVISORS: $115k → 9%MOORE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC POL: $133k → 14%PERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCE: $265k → 9%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 8%SENS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $300k → 8%THE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT: $55k → 10%AMAZON FRONTLINES: $63k → 10%THE PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA DEBRIS PR: $80k → 9%FRIENDS OF AFRICA AMINI FOUNDATION: $113k → 9%ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIG AGENCY: $70k → 14%GREEN TURTLE CAY: $75k → 10%T1INTERNATIONAL: $190k → 16%MOORE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC POL: $65k → 14%PERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCE: $153k → 9%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 8%THE PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA DEBRIS PR: $73k → 9%FRIENDS OF AFRICA AMINI FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%GREEN TURTLE CAY: $75k → 10%CURE ALLIANCE PHYSIOLOGIC DEVICES INC CO PETER LORD: $300k → 15%T1INTERNATIONAL: $133k → 16%MOORE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC POL: $62k → 14%PERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCE: $62k → 9%THE PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA DEBRIS PR: $68k → 9%JDRF T1D FUND: $380k → 17%OUTLAW OCEAN PROJECT: $201k → 14%CURE ALLIANCE PHYSIOLOGIC DEVICES INC CO PETER LORD: $250k → 15%T1INTERNATIONAL: $90k → 16%MOVING WINDMILL PROJECT: $225k → 17%OUTLAW OCEAN PROJECT: $175k → 14%T1INTERNATIONAL: $57k → 16%MOVING WINDMILL PROJECT: $161k → 17%OUTLAW OCEAN PROJECT: $150k → 14%JDRF T1D FUND: $125k → 17%OUTLAW OCEAN PROJECT: $150k → 14%MOVING WINDMILL PROJECT: $105k → 17%THE GUARDIAN ORG FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%MOVING WINDMILL PROJECT: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
DC
HI
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 33% of McPike Zima Charitable Foundation US’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 20% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 16%.

McPike Zima Charitable Foundation USlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 22 repeat orgs$610k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$7.1M
$360k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+17%

Still filing today

55%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureEducationHealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OP
    OO PROJECT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $676k · revenue +241%
  • TS
    THE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2022 · $539k · revenue +147% · 33% of their budget
  • PI
    PERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $480k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • 3A
    3 AXIS ADVISORS
    one grant, 2021 · $115k
  • HF
    HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $65k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marine Megafauna Foundation

Save threatened marine life using pioneering research, education, and sustainable conservation solutions

International
2
Ocean Alliance Project

Protecting and promoting the marine biodiversity of Hawai'i through coral restoration, ecological monitoring, regenerative tourism, and cultural integration

Science & Tech
3
Marine Science Institute

The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.

—
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Oceanic Preservation Society

Expose the truth. protect the planet. we expose complex, global environmental issues and promote advocacy through the use of film, photography, social media, and collaboration.

Environment
6
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
7
The Global Foundation for Ocean Exploration Inc

To empower the global underwater science community with the tools and expertise required to explore the greatest depths of the planet's largest and deepest bodies of water and return with discoveries that amaze and inspire a global…

Science & Tech
8
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
9
OneReef Worldwide Stewardship

OneReefs mission is to ensure healthy ocean ecosystems and thriving coastal communities across the Pacific.

Animals
10
National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc

The nmmf's mission is to improve and protect life for marine mammals, humans, and our shared oceans through science, service, and education. our vision is to be the leading laboratory in marine mammal science, where critical questions…

Animals
11
Sea Research Foundation Inc

To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.

Animals
12
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Atlantic University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Warrior Flow Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JDRF T1D FUND: $629,540 · OtherJDRF T1D FUNDMOVING WINDMILL PROJECT: $566,150 · OtherMOVING WINDMILL PROJECTCURE ALLIANCE PHYSIOLOGIC DEVICES INC CO PETER LORD: $550,000 · OtherCURE ALLIANCE PHYSIOLOGIC DEVICES INC CO PET…PERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCE: $480,100 · OtherPERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCETHE PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA DEBRIS PR: $385,500 · OtherTHE PAPAHANAUMOKUAKEA DEBRIS PRFRIENDS OF AFRICA AMINI FOUNDATION: $340,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF AFRICA AMINI FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $330,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMOORE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC POL: $310,100 · OtherMOORE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC POL+14 more: $581,000 · Other+14 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $3,000,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard…+2 more: $50,000 · EducationT1INTERNATIONAL USA T1International: $662,591 · HealthT1INTERNATION…Lifespan Research Institution: $600,000 · HealthLifespan Rese…OO PROJECT: $675,500 · EnvironmentOO PROJECTTHE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT: $200,000 · EnvironmentTHE STORY O…AMAZON FRONTLINES: $127,500 · EnvironmentAMAZON FRON…FRIENDS OF THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF …+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION: $538,900 · InternationalENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY: $195,000 · InternationalMASS DESIGN GROUP LTD: $50,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalBIMINI BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION FOUNDATION INC: $103,500 · Science & TechOcean Rescue Alliance Inc: $50,000 · Science & TechGUARDIANORG FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNEWS NETWORK: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$4,172,390Education$3,050,000Health$1,262,591Environment$1,108,000International$788,900Science & Tech$153,500Arts & Culture$130,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $3,000,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOO PROJECT: $675,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetT1INTERNATIONAL USA T1International: $662,591 over 5y, 51% of budgetLifespan Research Institution: $600,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetTHE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION: $538,900 over 3y, 33% of budgetPERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCE: $480,100 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetTHE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT: $200,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY: $195,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetAMAZON FRONTLINES: $127,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGUARDIANORG FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetBIMINI BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION FOUNDATION INC: $103,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $100,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetOCEANS FORWARD: $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetMASS DESIGN GROUP LTD: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOcean Rescue Alliance Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHARKS4KIDS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetINTERNEWS NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Abraham Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED PLANT SAVERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWater for South Sudan Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds OO PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds T1INTERNATIONAL USA T1International ↗
  • Who funds Lifespan Research Institution ↗
  • Who funds THE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PERRY INSTITUTE FOR MARINE SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON FRONTLINES ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIANORG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIMINI BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEANS FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds MASS DESIGN GROUP LTD ↗
  • Who funds Ocean Rescue Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARKS4KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WARRIOR FLOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MAUI HUB ↗
  • Who funds The Abraham Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PLANT SAVERS ↗
  • Who funds Water for South Sudan Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Globalgiving Foundation IncDC16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · The Ford Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McPike Zima Charitable Foundation US funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McPike Zima Charitable Foundation US. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to McPike Zima Charitable Foundation US?

Find your warmest path to McPike Zima Charitable Foundation US through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McPike Zima Charitable Foundation US’ filings →

More from the funding graph