Skip to content
Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 at a glance

· Private foundation

Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$302k
Granted FY2026still arriving
17
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$400kHuman Services$398kHousing & Shelter$190kYouth Development$165kCivil Rights$165kFood & Nutrition$151kEducation$111kArts & Culture$60kOther$0
02FY2026 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $297k
$17,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REACH OUT AND READ$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK RE$30,000
CHEYENNE VILLAGE$25,000
CAREERS IN CONSTRUCTION COLORADO$25,000
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR$20,000
PEAK EDUCATION$20,000
CASA OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC$20,000
SPECIAL KIDS - SPECIAL FAMILIES INC$20,000
DREAM CENTERS OF COLORADO SPRINGS$17,000
COLORADO SPRINGS PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA$15,000
CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE$15,000
FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION$15,000
THE PLACE$15,000
FOOD TO POWER$10,071
B COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $523k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE PLACE: $25k → 9%THE PLACE: $20k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%THE PLACE: $20k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%THE PLACE: $15k → 9%THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC: $15k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY: $10k → 9%B COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE: $15k → 9%CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE: $15k → 9%DIAKONIA: $8k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $50k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $45k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $44k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $40k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $35k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $25k → 9%CHEYENNE VILLAGE: $21k → 9%TRI LAKES CARES: $10k → 9%TRI LAKES CARES: $10k → 9%TRI LAKES CARES: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 27 repeat orgs$535k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
34

Total granted

$1.6M
$535k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+33%

Still filing today

78%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    Cheyenne Village
    7× · 2020–2026 · $260k · revenue +21%
  • CO
    CASA of the Pikes Peak Region
    5× · 2019–2026 · $165k · revenue +8%
  • Care and Share Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $126k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CS
    COLORADO SPRINGS COMMUNITY CULTURAL
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • JI
    JOINT INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -2%
  • DS
    DISABILITY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
2
La Plata Youth Services

La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.

Crime & Legal
3
The Pinon Project

The Pinon Project Family Resource Center strengthens our community by providing comprehensive services for children and families.

Human Services
4
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
5
Colorado Mental Wellness Network

To empower Coloradans affected by mental health conditions and providing them with skills and tools necessary to achieve their personal wellness goal.

Health
6
Summitstone Health Partners

SummitStone provides comprehensive behavioral health services across all care levels: 24/7 crisis services, inpatient and outpatient treatment, housing, residential care, and peer support. We partner with law enforcement, schools, and…

Health
7
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
8
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
9
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
10
Colorado Homeless Families Inc

CHF assists working families in their quest to go from homelessness to self-sufficiency for life.

Housing & Shelter
11
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
12
Urban Peak Denver

Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joint Initiatives for Youth and Families; the most unlike its peers is The Catamount Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cheyenne Village: $259,600 · Human ServicesCheyenne VillageThe Place: $80,000 · Human ServicesThe PlaceFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $71,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATIONTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSIONTRI-LAKES CARES: $30,000 · Human ServicesThe Catamount Institute: $30,000 · Human ServicesB COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING: $20,000 · Human Services+5 more: $60,500 · Human Services+5 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK RE: $65,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK …REACH OUT AND READ: $56,178 · OtherREACH OUT AND READCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR: $56,000 · OtherCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FORCOLORADO SPRINGS COMMUNITY CULTURAL: $50,000 · OtherCOLORADO SPRINGS COMMUNITY CULTURALJOINT INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $50,000 · OtherJOINT INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH AND FAMILI…COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILD: $30,000 · OtherDISABILITY SERVICES INC: $30,000 · OtherWomens Resource Agency Inc: $30,000 · OtherPeak Education: $60,000 · OtherPeak EducationAtlas Preparatory School Inc: $30,000 · OtherPIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $30,000 · OtherColorado Springs Philharmonic Orchestra: $25,000 · Other+21 more: $224,500 · Other+21 moreSpecial Kids-Special Families Inc: $55,000 · HealthSpecial Kid…DREAM CENTERS OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $54,000 · HealthDREAM CENTE…PEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $50,000 · HealthPEAK VISTA …SERENITY RECOVERY CONNECTION: $25,000 · HealthSERENITY RE…COLORADO BOYS RANCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthCOLORADO BO…KIDS IN NEED OF DENTISTRY: $10,000 · HealthCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $165,000 · Civil RightsCare and Share Inc: $125,555 · Food & NutritionFOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE): $35,071 · Food & NutritionGRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterHomeward Pikes Peak: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterENERGY RESOURCE CENTER: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterWe Fortify: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterPartners in Housing Inc: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterCareers in Construction Colorado: $65,000 · EmploymentMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER: $60,000 · Employment
Human Services$596,100Other$736,678Health$209,000Civil Rights$165,000Food & Nutrition$160,626Housing & Shelter$150,000Employment$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCheyenne Village: $259,600 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $165,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCare and Share Inc: $125,555 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Place: $80,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $71,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCareers in Construction Colorado: $65,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER: $60,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPeak Education: $60,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSpecial Kids-Special Families Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDREAM CENTERS OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $54,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPEAK VISTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOINT INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHomeward Pikes Peak: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE): $35,071 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTRI-LAKES CARES: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAtlas Preparatory School Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSERENITY RECOVERY CONNECTION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetColorado Springs Philharmonic Orchestra: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetB COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetENERGY RESOURCE CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO BOYS RANCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWe Fortify: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPartners in Housing Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPARENTS CHALLENGE: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCourt Care for the Pikes Peak Region Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTESSA: $13,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCrossfire Ministries Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Christian Home For Children Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS IN NEED OF DENTISTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED STATES ASSOCIATION OF BLIND ATHLETES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF COLORADO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationThe Joseph Henry Edmo…Colorado Springs Heal…Pikes Peak Community …The Myron Stratton Ho…Pikes Peak United WayINDYGIVE DBA Give Pik…The Marson FoundationThe Hester E & Edwin …Mile High United Way …The Nutrition Camp Sc…Carl W & Carrie Mae J…
El Pomar FoundationCO70.8× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Pikes Peak United Way · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · The Marson Foundation · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Nutrition Camp School Foundaton Inc · Carl W & Carrie Mae Joslyn Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home