· Private foundation
The Nutrition Camp School Foundaton Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EARLY CONNECTIONS | $15,000 |
| TRI-LAKES CARE | $10,000 |
| CASA - COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES | $10,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S LITERACY CENTER | $10,000 |
| THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE | $8,500 |
| PEAK EDUCATION - COS OR WP | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS | $5,000 |
| LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| HILLSIDE CONNECTION | $5,000 |
| SPECIAL KIDSSPECIAL FAMILIES | $5,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HTE PIKES PEAK REGION | $5,000 |
| GRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC | $5,000 |
| KIDPOWER | $4,000 |
| HOMEWARD PIKES PEAK | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $350k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC6× · 2017–2023 · $80k · revenue +56%
Care and Share Inc7× · 2017–2023 · $76k · revenue +45%- CLChildren's Literacy Center Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +159%
Funded once
- CCCOURT CAREone grant, 2022 · $17k
- CSCOLORADO SPRINGS PREGNANCY CENTERone grant, 2023 · $5k
- PEPeak Educationgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +366%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
The Pinon Project Family Resource Center strengthens our community by providing comprehensive services for children and families.
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
Colorado CASA is a nonprofit organization that works to strengthen local CASA organizations and advocate for children in the child welfare system.
We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
CHF assists working families in their quest to go from homelessness to self-sufficiency for life.
Elevating Connections is dedicated to building sustained positive relationships for current & former youth in foster care-including those experiencing sibling separation-to find their voice & build meaningful community connections.
Supporting children and families through individual, community-based services. We provide behavioral health services to severely emotionally disturbed children (ages 2 to 24) and their families.
Addressing the needs of residents in the rim mountain communities through case management, direct services and referrals, and collaborating with governmental and nonprofit community resource providers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Springs Child Nursery Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Nation Walking Together. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
- Who funds Children's Literacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds The Place ↗
- Who funds B COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING ↗
- Who funds THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-LAKES CARES ↗
- Who funds Forge Evolution ↗
- Who funds Atlas Preparatory School Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE LA FAMILIA CENTRO DE LA FAMILIA ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds Special Kids-Special Families Inc ↗
- Who funds TESSA ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
- Who funds Court Care for the Pikes Peak Region Inc ↗
- Who funds Partners in Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC ↗
- Who funds Hillside Connection ↗
- Who funds Homeward Pikes Peak ↗
- Who funds Nursing and Therapy Services of Colorado ↗
- Who funds GRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Peak Education ↗
- Who funds Mercy's Gate ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds Womens Resource Agency Inc ↗
- Who funds The Catamount Institute ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Pikes Peak United Way · The Myron Stratton Home · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation · Carl W & Carrie Mae Joslyn Charitable Trust · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Marson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Nutrition Camp School Foundaton Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.