· Private foundation
Lucky Heart Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC | $10,000 |
| THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY A COLORADO NON-PROFIT | $10,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $2,500 |
| KERRVILLE PETS ALIVE | $2,500 |
| NY COMMUNITY FRIDGE CORP | $2,500 |
| SMILE FARMS INC | $2,500 |
| RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY | $2,500 |
| MARYLAND SPCA INC | $2,500 |
| CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE | $2,500 |
| OPERATION SMILE INC | $2,500 |
| FIDOS FOR FREEDOM INC | $2,500 |
| IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC | $2,500 |
| THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY | $2,500 |
| KEEPER OF THE WILD WILDLIFE RESCUE AND SANCTUARY | $2,500 |
| LOWCOUNTRY MARINE MAMMAL NETWORK | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DEDAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC8× · 2018–2025 · $44k · revenue +61%
- PTParker Task Force for Human Services6× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +78%
- HUHELPING UP MISSION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- EIEARTHWATCH INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +3%
- CACHARLESTON AREA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +26%
- EREUNOIA RESCUEone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -81%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
Dorchester Paws strives to instill humane principles into society through the prevention of cruelty to animals.
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.
World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Zoological Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Morgans Message Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds Parker Task Force for Human Services ↗
- Who funds EARTHWATCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Middleton Place Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLESTON AREA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
- Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EUNOIA RESCUE ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER RUXTON AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SMILE FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF RAMANA'S GARDEN ↗
- Who funds LOWCOUNTRY EQUINE-ASSISTED PSYCHOTHERAPY ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds The Jamie and Paige Malone Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Blink of an Eye - Integrative Center for Trauma Healing Advocacy and Transformat ↗
- Who funds LOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF ↗
- Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HAPPY DAYS INC ↗
- Who funds One-Eighty Place ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
- Who funds ECKHART TOLLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF HARFORD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FRISKY'S WILDLIFE AND PRIMATE SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS ON POINT INC ↗
- Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds BBI HOLDINGS INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds Communities in Schools of South Carolina ↗
- Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds KERRVILLE PETS ALIVE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Joanna Foundation · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Mark Elliott Motley Foundation Inc · Kuznik Charitable Foundation · George R & Janet E Desko Charitable Foundation · Advanced Technology International · Kelly Family Foundation · Trident United Way · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · France-Merrick Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lucky Heart Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Moveable Feast Inc — 18% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Black Women Build - Baltimore Inc — 10% of income from government
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- Maryland Zoological Society Inc — 3% of income from government
- Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England — 2% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.