Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lori & Michael Nash Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$770k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$167k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$2.7MEducation$853kYouth Development$438kFood & Nutrition$333kPhilanthropy$330kInternational$326kRecreation & Sports$127kHousing & Shelter$102kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $228k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $477k
$8,287
Median grant
11
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$167,081
DREAM CHARTER SCHOOL$100,000
SPARK YOUTH NYC INC$100,000
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$60,000
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$50,000
MCC THEATER$26,450
TEACHING MATTERS$25,725
HARLEM RBI INC$25,000
GROUNDSWELL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$25,000
BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION$20,708
ANSWER THE CALL NEW YORK POLICE & FIRE WIDOWS' & CHILDREN'S BENEFIT FUND$18,653
TOM JAY COUGHLIN FUND FOUNDATION$15,000
MET COUNCIL$10,800
GOOD FOOD WORKS$10,676
LET'S WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $157k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 11%WHEELING FORWARD INC: $526 → 20%GRAHAMS FOUNDATION: $8k → 18%SERVICESOURCE FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 6%THE MARION & AARON GURAL JCC: $2k → 6%SERVICESOURCE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 6%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $200 → 8%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $25k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $5k → 16%SERVICESOURCE FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 6%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $2k → 16%CATHOLIC COALITION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION: $1k → 8%TRIP OF A LIFETIME INC: $2k → 9%PROJECT TOAL (TRIP OF A LIFETIME): $2k → 9%THE BLUE CARD INC: $5k → 17%PROJECT TOAL (TRIP OF A LIFETIME): $2k → 9%TRIP OF A LIFETIME INC: $1k → 9%TRIP OF A LIFETIME: $1k → 9%TRIP OF A LIFETIME INC: $1k → 9%TRIP OF A LIFETIME INC: $1k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $1k → 17%NEW YORK POLICE & FIRE WIDOWS' & CHILDREN'S BENEFIT FUND: $6k → 17%ANSWER THE CALL: $6k → 17%ANSWER THE CALL NEW YORK POLICE & FIRE WIDOWS' & CHILDREN'S BENEFIT FUND: $1k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC: $5k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $2k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $10k → 17%GOOD FOOD WORKS: $11k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 68 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

68 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 54 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
111

Total granted

$3.9M
$849k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+16%

Still filing today

84%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +33%
  • SN
    SPARKYOUTH NYC INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $337k · revenue +21%
  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $297k · revenue +226%

Funded once

  • SU
    STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • TO
    THE OLI HILSDON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $105k
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Success Academy Charter Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Steven Schwartzberg Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Christian Missionary Organi…Dance Arts OrganizationsLocal History MuseumsIndependent K-12 SchoolsSchool Parent OrganizationsFood Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Lgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity Arts CentersCancer Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%57%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/170
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,395

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

166 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 166 of the 211 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
161/166
Grantees still filing
109/166
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $2,120,208 · OtherMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY — $150,000 · Other+105 more — $1,125,343 · Other+105 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $310,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF …DREAM CHARTER SCHOOL — $100,000 · EducationDREAM CHARTE…TEACHING MATTERS INC — $61,289 · EducationTEACHING MAT…UNCOMMON SCHOOLS INC — $36,000 · EducationUNCOMMON SCH…+20 more — $90,336 · Education+20 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $101,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyHARLEM RBI INC — $25,517 · PhilanthropyGROUNDSWELL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Philanthropy+8 more — $30,187 · PhilanthropyLISA B FISHMAN FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC — $50,000 · HealthLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $45,000 · HealthMS HOPE FOR A CURE INC — $25,000 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $20,708 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR GENDER-SPECIFIC MEDICINE INC — $20,000 · HealthLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $15,584 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $13,530 · Health+25 more — $75,490 · HealthSPARKYOUTH NYC INC — $337,129 · Crime & LegalGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $297,080 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $17,200 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $5,000 · Food & NutritionNY POLICE AND FIRE WIDOWS' & CHILDREN'S BENEFIT FUND INC — $78,943 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $23,288 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INC — $16,105 · Human ServicesGOOD FOOD WORKS INC — $10,676 · Human ServicesTRIP OF A LIFETIME INC — $10,077 · Human ServicesGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC — $8,630 · Human ServicesGRAHAMS FOUNDATION — $8,287 · Human Services+9 more — $36,600 · Human Services
Other$3,395,551Education$597,625Philanthropy$347,204Health$345,312Crime & Legal$337,129Food & Nutrition$319,280Human Services$222,606

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $2,120,208 over 9y, 14% of budgetSPARKYOUTH NYC INC — $337,129 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $310,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $297,080 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $101,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM CHARTER SCHOOL — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEE OFF FORE LIFE INC — $88,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLISA B FISHMAN FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetNY POLICE AND FIRE WIDOWS' & CHILDREN'S BENEFIT FUND INC — $78,943 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTEACHING MATTERS INC — $61,289 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $58,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC — $56,363 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHAILEYS HOPE FOUNDATION — $41,000 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetUNCOMMON SCHOOLS INC — $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC — $26,450 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARLEM RBI INC — $25,517 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIGESTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,200 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMS HOPE FOR A CURE INC — $25,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $23,288 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $20,708 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR GENDER-SPECIFIC MEDICINE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $17,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC — $16,105 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $15,584 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $13,530 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $12,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHAMROCK WAY INC — $11,423 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $11,080 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $10,565 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STEVEN SCHWARTZBERG FOUNDATION INC — $10,387 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCIVIC BUILDERS INC — $10,145 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRIP OF A LIFETIME INC — $10,077 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Debra and Kenneth Cap…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundAmerican Express Foun…The Hyde and Watson F…Gray FoundationRobin Hood FoundationUnited Way Miami IncMarch Family Foundati…Fisher Brothers Found…May and Samuel Rudin …Fjc
Debra and Kenneth Caplan FoundationDE38.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Debra and Kenneth Caplan Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · American Express Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Gray Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · March Family Foundation · Fisher Brothers Foundation Inc % Fisher Brothers · May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Inc · Fjc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lori & Michael Nash Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America — 21% of income from government
  • Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
  • The Open Door Shelter Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Chapel Haven Schleifer Center Inc — 13% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Park Central Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lori & Michael Nash Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lori & Michael Nash Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 211 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines