· Private foundation
Leibowitz and Greenway Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $103k
- $10k–50k50 grants · $745k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC | $50,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR THE MENTALLY ILL | $30,000 |
| IRIS - INTEGRATED REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT | $30,000 |
| AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA | $25,000 |
| OXFAM AMERICA | $25,000 |
| MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT | $25,000 |
| CARE | $25,000 |
| PREVENT CHILD ABUSE NEW YORK | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| GLOBAL COMMUNITIES | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL VULVODYNIA ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SERVICE COMMITTEE | $20,000 |
| PROJECT HOPE | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN IN CRISIS | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $621k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
105 repeat relationships — 68 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $360k · revenue +98%- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC8× · 2017–2024 · $360k · revenue +81%
MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +10%
Funded once
United States Association for UNHCRone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -9%- DFDANCES FOR A VARIABLE POPULATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue +85%
- TWTHE WOW CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
Save the children is an international nonprofit children's relief and development organization. our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.
The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…
To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds National Vulvodynia Association Inc ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN BUREAU OF COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SMART RECOVERY USA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds PSYCHOTHERAPY & SPIRITUALITY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MIAMI INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Greater Horizons · The Ford Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leibowitz and Greenway Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Global Communities — 44% of income from government
- Girl Scout Council of Tropical Florida Inc — 14% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Phillip and Patricia Frost Museum of Science Inc — 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.