Skip to content
La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions at a glance

· Public charity

La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions

Making communities in los angeles county healthier through various programs.

$323k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$248k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Health$3.5MEducation$100kHousing & Shelter$100k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$247,545
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL FOR HEALTH HEALTH FOR ALL$247,545
JWCH INSTITUTE INC$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $250k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 6 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against +96% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$2.4M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+96%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $525k · revenue +271%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    3× · 2019–2022 · $500k · revenue +17%
  • O
    ONEGENERATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $500k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angelesgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +35%
  • CH
    CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue -21%
  • WM
    White Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtngraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
2
White Memorial Community Health Center

The mission of wmchc is to improve the health status and well-being of the population of los angeles county, ca through the direct provision or coordination of healthcare, health education, services, and research.

Health
3
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
4
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Medical Group

To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…

—
5
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Los Angeles Medical Center Foundation
Health
7
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
8
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
9
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
10
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
11
Family Health Care Centers of Greater Los Angeles

Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.

Health
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles General Medical Center Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $500,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $480,000 · HealthJWCH INSTITUTE INCCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $250,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn: $250,000 · HealthWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health…PIH Health Whittier Hospital: $250,000 · HealthPIH Health Whittier HospitalVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $100,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $525,000 · EducationCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSI…ALL FOR HEALTH HEALTH FOR ALL INC: $247,545 · EducationALL FOR HEALTH HEALTH F…ONEGENERATION: $500,000 · OtherONEGENERATIONLOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES GENERAL ME…Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $250,000 · Human ServicesHOUSING WORKS: $100,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$1,830,000Education$772,545Other$750,000Human Services$250,000Housing & Shelter$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $525,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONEGENERATION: $500,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $480,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn: $250,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetPIH Health Whittier Hospital: $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL FOR HEALTH HEALTH FOR ALL INC: $247,545 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING WORKS: $100,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Ralph M Parsons F…Baby2babyUnihealth FoundationDignity HealthPublic Health Institu…Weingart FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…
California Community FoundationCA18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Baby2baby · Unihealth Foundation · Dignity Health · Public Health Institute · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions?

    Find your warmest path to La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home