Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions

Making communities in los angeles county healthier through various programs.

$323k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$248k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182023.

Health$1.8MEducation$773kHuman Services$250kHousing & Shelter$100kOther$750k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$247,545
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL FOR HEALTH HEALTH FOR ALL$247,545
JWCH INSTITUTE INC$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $250k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 6 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +111% since the first grant, against +96% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$2.4M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+96%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $525k · revenue +271%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    3× · 2019–2022 · $500k · revenue +17%
  • O
    ONEGENERATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $500k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +417%
  • WM
    White Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtngraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +96%
  • CH
    CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue -21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
2
White Memorial Community Health Center

The mission of wmchc is to improve the health status and well-being of the population of los angeles county, ca through the direct provision or coordination of healthcare, health education, services, and research.

Health
3
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
4
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Medical Group

To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…

5
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Los Angeles Medical Center Foundation
Health
7
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
8
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
9
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
10
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
11
Family Health Care Centers of Greater Los Angeles

Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.

Health
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles General Medical Center Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $500,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesJWCH INSTITUTE INC — $480,000 · HealthJWCH INSTITUTE INCWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn — $250,000 · HealthWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health…CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $250,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONPIH Health Whittier Hospital — $250,000 · HealthPIH Health Whittier HospitalVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $100,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE — $525,000 · EducationCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSI…ALL FOR HEALTH HEALTH FOR ALL INC — $247,545 · EducationALL FOR HEALTH HEALTH F…ONEGENERATION — $500,000 · OtherONEGENERATIONLOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES GENERAL ME…Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $250,000 · Human ServicesHOUSING WORKS — $100,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$1,830,000Education$772,545Other$750,000Human Services$250,000Housing & Shelter$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE — $525,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONEGENERATION — $500,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC — $480,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn — $250,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPIH Health Whittier Hospital — $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALL FOR HEALTH HEALTH FOR ALL INC — $247,545 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING WORKS — $100,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Baby2baby · Unihealth Foundation · Dignity Health · Public Health Institute · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions?

    Find your warmest path to La Health Foundation Fka Cope Health Solutions through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph