Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
95
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$1.4M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 65 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

59
21
64
22
58
23
62
24
65
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Philanthropy$16MEducation$5.3MArts & Culture$3.1MAnimals$1.6MEmployment$899kHealth$394kHuman Services$377kRecreation & Sports$265kOther$0
02FY2025 · 95 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k77 grants · $162k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $417k
  • $250k+4 grants · $4.9M
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$1,420,000
DONORS TRUST$1,420,000
SHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER$1,300,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI-EAU CLAIRE FOUNDAT$793,150
OUR NAWAKWA INC$200,000
L E PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT C$117,000
FREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC$50,000
THE SEEING EYE$50,000
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$25,000
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI-PLATTEVILLE FOUND$20,000
MAYO CLINIC$20,000
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI FOUNDATION-MADISON$20,000
REASON FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.2M · 95 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.

95 repeat relationships — 81 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
24

Total granted

$8.2M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-18%

Still filing today

68%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $899k · revenue +7%
  • TS
    THE SEEING EYE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +12%
  • LP
    LE PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $215k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • LE
    L E PHILLIPS MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBR
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M
  • NW
    NORTHERN WISCONSIN STATE FAIR ASSOC
    one grant, 2022 · $945k · revenue -66%
  • HG
    HOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
2
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
3
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
4
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
8
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
9
Artpark & Company Inc

Artpark & company fosters a transformative world of artistic engagement that explores the human experience, cultivates creativity, and encourages curiosity. our work is informed by a long tradition of discovery, an expectation of artistic…

10
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
11
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
12
Wamc

Wamc is chartered by the new york state board of regents to "furnish, prepare and present non-profit and non-commercial educational, instructional and cultural radio programs and also non-profit and non-commercial programs (wamc's mission…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Parks Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chippewa Valley Pickleball Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts CentersYouth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesYmca Youth DevelopmentLocal Food System Organizat…Dance Arts OrganizationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …School District FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterSenior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%43%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/95
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,470

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
89/90
Grantees still filing
55/90
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $9,073,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDSHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC — $1,300,000 · Community ImprovementSHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC+2 more — $10,250 · Community ImprovementDonors Trust Inc — $6,493,000 · PhilanthropyDonors Trust Inc+5 more — $50,100 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF WI-EAU CLAIRE FOUNDAT — $3,580,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WI-EAU CLAIR…L E PHILLIPS MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBR — $1,500,000 · OtherL E PHILLIPS MEMORIAL PUBL…+104 more — $1,577,800 · Other+104 moreNORTHERN WISCONSIN STATE FAIR ASSOC — $945,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $450,000 · EducationLITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $80,650 · Education+7 more — $79,100 · EducationEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $1,507,600 · Animals+4 more — $33,500 · AnimalsLE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $899,000 · EmploymentTHE SEEING EYE INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $125,000 · Human Services+1 more — $4,000 · Human Services
Community Improvement$10,383,250Philanthropy$6,543,100Other$6,658,050Education$1,554,750Animals$1,541,100Employment$899,000Human Services$379,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $9,073,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDonors Trust Inc — $6,493,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $1,507,600 over 5y, 45% of budgetNORTHERN WISCONSIN STATE FAIR ASSOC — $945,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetLE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $899,000 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $450,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLE PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER INC — $215,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $100,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $80,650 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetFREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL ACADEMY — $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC — $28,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION — $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMENTARY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENT MEDICAL ALLIANCE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDunn County Humane Society Inc — $12,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHIPPEWA COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $11,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAUDIO & BRAILLE LITERACY ENHANCEMENT INC — $10,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOMER COMMUNITY VISITOR CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY CULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HISTORY THEATRE INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL ENTERPRISES FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN INC — $8,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEAU CLAIRE CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC — $7,600 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY — $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $7,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION — $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC — $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPRIMATES INCORPORATED — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVISIONING ACCESS INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds Donors Trust Inc
  • Who funds EAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds SHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC
  • Who funds NORTHERN WISCONSIN STATE FAIR ASSOC
  • Who funds LE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC
  • Who funds LE PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER INC
  • Who funds OUR NAWAKWA INC
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds LITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY
  • Who funds FREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL ACADEMY
  • Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COMMENTARY INC
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ALLIANCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jamf Nation Global FoundationMN30.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Melvin S Cohen Foundation Inc · Eau Claire Community Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Pablo Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · The Presto Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 135 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph