Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

Pro Musica Hebraica

Pro Musica Hebraica (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $137,295 to it, the largest being THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ($102,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$5k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$137k
Net assets
$2k
4/5 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Pro Musica Hebraica does

Mission

Production of performances showcasing classical Jewish music.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Pro Musica Hebraica is devoted to presenting lost and forgotten masterpieces of Jewish classical music in a concert-hall setting.

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($60k) Expenses 100 ($70k) Net assets 100 ($26k)2018 Revenue 39 ($23k) Expenses 57 ($40k) Net assets 35 ($9k)2019 Revenue 27 ($16k) Expenses 29 ($20k) Net assets 19 ($5k)2020 Revenue 4 ($3k) Expenses 9 ($6k) Net assets 5 ($1k)2021 Revenue 38 ($23k) Expenses 24 ($17k) Net assets 29 ($7k)2022 Revenue 0 ($1) Expenses 9 ($6k) Net assets 3 ($890)2023 Revenue 9 ($6k) Expenses 8 ($5k) Net assets 4 ($1k)2024 Revenue 42 ($25k) Expenses 32 ($22k) Net assets 15 ($4k)2025 Revenue 8 ($5k) Expenses 9 ($6k) Net assets 10 ($2k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (8)Expenses (9)Net assets (10)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $26k to $9k (−65%).

$26k
$9k
$5k
$1k
$7k
$890
$1k
$4k
$2k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of Pro Musica Hebraica’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (78% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 18,808 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$10k
’17
−$17k
’18
−$4k
’19
−$4k
’20
$6k
’21
−$6k
’22
$219
’23
$3k
’24
−$1k
’25
5.3
months of
reserve
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $75k → $500.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 97% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Pro Musica Hebraica’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Pro Musica Hebraica leans on a few funders — its largest provides 74% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

97% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Pro Musica Hebraica.

74%
largest funder
99%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 50% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

97% of Pro Musica Hebraica's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $4k that is directly attributable, 71% of it comes from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 2 states.

WI
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $134k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Pro Musica Hebraica's revenue fell 92% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−28% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−27% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,242 arts & culture nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like Pro Musica Hebraica

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Pro Musica Hebraica: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Pro Musica Hebraica?
Pro Musica Hebraica (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $137,295 to it, the largest being THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ($102,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Pro Musica Hebraica have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $137,295 in grants to Pro Musica Hebraica, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Pro Musica Hebraica?
THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC is the largest funder on record, with $102,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Pro Musica Hebraica find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pro Musica Hebraica →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing