Skip to content

· Private foundation

L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
95
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$1.4M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Donors Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 65 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

59
’21
64
’22
58
’23
62
’24
65
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$16MEducation$5.3MArts & Culture$3.1MAnimals$1.6MEmployment$899kHealth$394kHuman Services$377kRecreation & Sports$265kOther$0
02FY2025 · 95 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k77 grants · $162k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $417k
  • $250k+4 grants · $4.9M
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$1,420,000
DONORS TRUST$1,420,000
SHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER$1,300,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI-EAU CLAIRE FOUNDAT$793,150
OUR NAWAKWA INC$200,000
L E PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT C$117,000
THE SEEING EYE$50,000
FREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC$50,000
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$25,000
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI FOUNDATION-MADISON$20,000
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI-PLATTEVILLE FOUND$20,000
MAYO CLINIC$20,000
REASON FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 8%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 95 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

95 repeat relationships: 81 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
24

Total granted

$8.2M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-18%

Still filing today

68%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $899k · revenue +7%
  • TS
    THE SEEING EYE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +12%
  • LP
    LE PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $215k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • LE
    L E PHILLIPS MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBR
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M
  • NW
    NORTHERN WISCONSIN STATE FAIR ASSOC
    one grant, 2022 · $945k · revenue -66%
  • HG
    HOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
2
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
3
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
4
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
8
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
9
Artpark & Company Inc

Artpark & company fosters a transformative world of artistic engagement that explores the human experience, cultivates creativity, and encourages curiosity. our work is informed by a long tradition of discovery, an expectation of artistic…

—
10
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
11
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
12
Wamc

Wamc is chartered by the new york state board of regents to "furnish, prepare and present non-profit and non-commercial educational, instructional and cultural radio programs and also non-profit and non-commercial programs (wamc's mission…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Parks Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chippewa Valley Pickleball Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
89/90
Grantees still filing
55/90
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $9,073,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDSHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC: $1,300,000 · Community ImprovementSHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC+2 more: $10,250 · Community ImprovementDonors Trust Inc: $6,493,000 · PhilanthropyDonors Trust Inc+5 more: $50,100 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF WI-EAU CLAIRE FOUNDAT: $3,580,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WI-EAU CLAIR…L E PHILLIPS MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBR: $1,500,000 · OtherL E PHILLIPS MEMORIAL PUBL…+104 more: $1,577,800 · Other+104 moreNORTHERN WISCONSIN STATE FAIR ASSOC: $945,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $450,000 · EducationLITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $80,650 · Education+7 more: $79,100 · EducationEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,507,600 · Animals+4 more: $33,500 · AnimalsLE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $899,000 · EmploymentTHE SEEING EYE INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $125,000 · Human Services+1 more: $4,000 · Human Services
Community Improvement$10,383,250Philanthropy$6,543,100Other$6,658,050Education$1,554,750Animals$1,541,100Employment$899,000Human Services$379,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $9,073,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDonors Trust Inc: $6,493,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,507,600 over 5y, 45% of budgetNORTHERN WISCONSIN STATE FAIR ASSOC: $945,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetLE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $899,000 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLE PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER INC: $215,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $80,650 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetFREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL ACADEMY: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $28,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINDEPENDENT MEDICAL ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMENTARY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDunn County Humane Society Inc: $12,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHIPPEWA COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $11,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAUDIO & BRAILLE LITERACY ENHANCEMENT INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY CULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBLOOMER COMMUNITY VISITOR CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE HISTORY THEATRE INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL ENTERPRISES FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN INC: $8,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEAU CLAIRE CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $7,600 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPRIMATES INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVISIONING ACCESS INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds EAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELL LAKE ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN WISCONSIN STATE FAIR ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds LE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds LE PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR NAWAKWA INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMENTARY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jamf Nation Global FoundationMN30.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Melvin S Cohen Foundation Inc · Eau Claire Community Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Pablo Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · The Presto Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to L E Phillips Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 135 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on L E Phillips Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph